Albert had never been suspicious, at least not in his previous life, which may have something to do with the circumstances of his life, but now he had to say that Professor Rowanna Smith was a little suspicious, at least from the fact that the information he had obtained so far had been put together.

Admittedly, there was also Albert's prejudice as a time-traveler, but he still believed that before Voldemort completely took over the streets, every wizard who came to Hogwarts to serve as a Defence Against the Dark Arts professor was here to do something, and he might be implicated in something.

Perhaps, the final answer may be far from his own guess, but before Professor Smith leaves Hogwarts, it does not prevent Albert from temporarily blacklisting the other party.

The form of the Boggart is closely related to the fear in people's hearts, and Professor Smith's Boggart has become the corpse of Isobel's father, which has to make Albert suspicious.

He even ventured to speculate that the death of Isobel's father was most likely related to Professor Smith, if not directly linked, then indirectly.

According to Isobel, her father died from a magical experiment.

If you had to tie everything together, the only thing the four had in common was that they were all candidates for heirs, and they had all been trained by heirs.

Therefore, Albert boldly speculated that the failure of Isobel's father's magic experiment was a man-made inducement, and Professor Smith was likely to be the culprit, so Isobel's father's corpse would become Professor Smith's fear, possibly caused by his intentional, unintentional, or even indirect killing of his friend.

Albert wrote down his guesses in a quill in a small notebook, and this kind of plot is common in reasoning, and the trigger may be for something.

As for the so-called something?

Nature is the business of the heirs.

In order to inherit a large Galleon and other valuable inheritance, it is not surprising to do such a thing.

Although this speculation is a bit ridiculous, it does not mean that such a bold speculation is impossible.

The wealth is big enough to make people crazy, and as long as the stakes are big enough, it's not impossible to backstab a friend.

Then there is the speculation about the treasure trove of Ravenclaw's knowledge.

Why did Professor Smith want to get his hands on the wealth in the Ravenclaw Vault?

There are two speculations about this, the first is that Ravenclaw's secret room is related to the matter of the heir, and the second is purely for the wealth inside, but knowing that the wealth inside is knowledge, so the back of Professor Smith was so lonely before.

If the four are linked to the Ravenclaw treasury, the first is more likely.

Moreover, Isobel may have found the Ravenclaw treasure trove of knowledge from his father's notes, indicating that his father most likely went inside and may have become an heir from obtaining something in it.

Because there is only one heir, he was killed?

But why didn't Professor Smith become the heir?

The reason why Albert was sure that Professor Smith was not the heir was because the last time he was entertained by Mog McDoug to the Lake Lodge for Halloween on Halloween, he noticed that Professor Broad and the others were out of age, if they were really related to the heir, or ...... In fact, Professor Broad is responsible for selecting the heirs, and even they themselves are the heirs?

So, what was Professor Broad's purpose in coming to Hogwarts last year?

For the sake of the Ravenclaw treasury of knowledge, or about the heir, but there is one thing that even Albert cannot deny, Professor Broad eventually helped himself, and was not hostile to him, even kind as if he were a relative.

As a result, Albert did not suspect Professor Smith at first, not only because they knew each other, but also because he did not know about the heir at the time, and only thought that Professor Broad was planning to pull him into some circle of friends.

If the bold speculation is true, what role does Isobel play in this matter?

An avenger who avenged his father?

Or is it for the sake of the candidate for the position of heir?

Or rather...... Both?

"And what role do you play?" Albert muttered to himself, looking at the parchment in his hand, "the unlucky bastard who has been involved in this affair for no apparent reason?

What is the role of Professor Broad and Mr. Mog McDoug?

Judge for the selection of heirs?

So...... Is Mr. Smith the heir candidate and villain boss?

No, Professor Smith may already be unqualified, after all, he is the heir candidate in the previous round, and whether he succeeds or not, the role of heir candidate should be removed?

What's more, he has already failed.

Of course, there is also a possibility that Mr. Smith is also an "heir" referee, after all, with Snape's case in the front, it is really difficult to say until the end.

No way, the plot is really sometimes, but the reality is sometimes even more, not to mention that he is now in this world that I don't know if it's or reality.

Of course, all of this may be Albert's own delusions, but he still thinks that Professor Smith's visit to Hogwarts has something to do with the heir, after all, Rowanna's surname is Smith, and the so-called coincidences are usually just coincidents that are thought to be made.

Well, one last question.

Isobel seems to know a lot of things, how on earth does she know so many things?

Was she told, or was she inferred from what her father had left behind, or was there some way she had some way of asking for information?

All three are possible, but there is no doubt that Isobel knows a lot of things, and is even closer to the truth of the matter than he is, but the other party is reluctant to say it.

Albert is not incomprehensible to Isobel, he will keep secrets if he is killed, and he will not easily trust others.

"Somehow, it always feels like the world is very unsafe!" Albert tore off the pages of his diary and threw them into the flames and burned them to ashes.

Now, he just wants his speculations to be just frivolous delusions.

"Sure enough, you should still prepare more things for yourself to defend yourself. Albert muttered, if possible, really wanting to carry two wands with him.

Why bring two?

This is habitual thinking, most wizards will only have a magic wand, and many villains like to nag something to show off themselves after disarming the other party's weapon, which can be regarded as giving others a chance to turn defeat into victory.

Who let the villain die for too many words?