Alas, after reading the book review area, I didn't want to pay attention to it, after all, there are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand viewers, and a thousand readers may have ten thousand thoughts. There is no doubt about this, because people are complex, pure people may have, but it is too precious, which friends in the ups and downs of society may deeply understand.

So, you can't ask for only one voice, and the one-sided applause is ghostly, unless the reader is not thinking and is a robot. That's what I'm afraid of, because then I can't even see my own shortcomings, and the authorities are confused, so they need sober readers to give an objective and fair evaluation, impartially.

I was mentally prepared for this, and that's why I didn't want to reply, but after thinking about it, let's explain. After all, I wrote the book, and if the reader has doubts or disagrees with your book, you have the obligation to explain, if nothing else, and the reader's time spent on the book alone is worth it.

I have to say that some readers are very "amazing", no need to guess, this is not a positive evaluation. For example, some readers said that it was better to change the name to Xiuxian Memoirs, memories account for a large part of the content, I feel that it is not nutritious, it has no effect and no meaning, and said that the roommate A, B, C and D are in the water, and the last one is poisonous.

This is poisonous, I don't know if it's poisoned to others, I think it's poisonous, but I was the first to poison it.

The reader may be more "straightforward" in this way, at least in writing and reading, he does not know that there are many kinds of expressions in writing, narratives, flashbacks, interludes, and even montages. I don't know what a new issue means for a book, I've been suppressing the word count just waiting for recommendations, but it still seems to be far away, which is not good news, it makes the future of the book uncertain, or even non-promising. Therefore, many authors, both new and old, will not "water" in the new book period, that is death, and the water will also pass the new book period, unless you are a great god and have no fear. Because the author has to use the limited text in the new book period to attract readers, attract editors, and even attract various resources, including recommendations.

Therefore, to say that I am water, first of all, is wronged, and secondly, that the reader did not understand it, and in his opinion the memory is useless. But recalling that content makes the pig's feet vivid, full of feelings, and supports the flesh and blood of the pig's feet. Maybe in that reader's opinion, the flat and direct narrative is the "right way", the way it should be written, maybe I should use other bridges, or "in progress" to fill the face of pig's feet.

It's still that kind of statement, this is a matter of writing technique, not deliberate, but it's not useless, for example, why do I want to portray the image and feelings of pig's feet a lot? That 10,000-character memory highlights the "white" of pig's feet, the so-called white is black, and there must be a song if there is straightness, which involves the following content, so I won't spoil it. I can't even afford to name a few roommates, is it difficult to come up with a few names? This is to cause the follow-up abruptness, which is also a way of expression, because I don't treat them as passers-by at all, there are characters in the back, I don't say spoilers, but it's still a little thorough, helpless, I hate spoilers.

Although I don't want to say this, I still want to say that the reader's opinion is too low-level and naïve, and you can't understand ordinary writing techniques, did you pass the reading comprehension in middle school?

Again, when a reader reads a book, it is also a process of collision between his own thoughts and the ideas in the book. The ideas in the so-called book come from the author, but also from the setting and construction. Otherwise, how could there be a saying that the three views of so-and-so drama and so-and-so book are not correct. Therefore, no author has the luxury of expecting his book to be recognized by all readers, because differences in life experiences also mean disagreement in thought.

Even if some particularly powerful authors have perfect settings, there must still be people who disagree, this is the reality.

There are other readers who say that the pig's feet deal with their girlfriend's poison, and say that they sit and wait for the back to pretend to be slapped in the face. I think this reader may be new to online novels, this can't be demanding, people come over like this, but I really want to pretend to be slapped in the face so superficially written, I can make old readers scold as grandchildren, so I hope to understand. Of course, there will definitely be a "special" plot later, otherwise I don't need to design a breakup at all, although in the early stage it mainly serves to highlight the pig's foot character.

There is also the saying of buying good reviews, which insults the IQ of everyone, the readers, the authors, and their own. The thought of it makes people speechless.

Some readers may have noticed that the style of the book is unstable, or that it has changed later, which can only be said to be undesirable. I want to continue the previous consistent way of writing, try to make the book read witty and humorous, but unfortunately the time to send the book is not right, encountered a severe crackdown, under all kinds of warnings, I don't dare to write that, simply return to the right path, after all, the story is the main body, this is a book of abilities.

Therefore, let's seek common ground while reserving differences, and even if we don't like it, we can abandon it and spit on it, but there is no need to "poison". Do you know how many readers have been scared away by your poisonous sentence, and what kind of blow has the author suffered?

I started to doubt myself, and I read through and checked it again and again, just to find the "toxic" place.

Maybe it's just that the reader said it casually, just to express his disapproval, but it doesn't seem that simple to others. The steps for some readers to find a readable book are as follows: read the book review first, open it for good reviews, and read it completely depending on the mood if there is a bad review.

This has become a habit for readers to choose books, after all, time is precious, and no one wants to waste it.

When I first posted the book, I tried to reply, and even replied to some not very serious comments, just to liven up the atmosphere. But then I don't read the reviews much, it's too "hit", if you have a reason to point out what shortcomings and shortcomings the book has, I will gladly accept it, which will be acceptable to most authors, but I can't make some assertions without beginning and end, which makes the author reflect and don't know how to reflect.

The results of this book are too poor, and it can be expected to hit the streets, so everyone can cherish it, the author doesn't have much confidence. I don't even think that recommendations can save this book, and the collection is too small to be able to increase at all. To be honest, it's painful, I always take a long time to prepare for a book, but often the structure dies before it can be developed.

Therefore, among the readers there are "masters", and the author sincerely asks for a diagnosis to see what is wrong with this book and why it is just not pleasing.

Thank you.