Chapter 99 Systematic Guidance
Wang Yi faced the computer, looking at the part of the content he had just written, he felt a faint sense of accomplishment in his heart, and he wanted to share with the system excitedly: "System, how is it?" What do you think of that sad story I just wrote? Isn't it great and impressive? ”
A tone in which I feel great, and the system is coming to praise me.
It's a pity that the system gave him a scoop of cold water, which felt really cold and heart-warming.
"It's alright!" This is the system's answer: "But your description is not detailed enough!" I can feel that there is something missing in the process of reading experience, and if you can make up for that thing, the reader's reading experience will be even better! ”
"Oh! What should I do? Hearing the system's narration, Wang Yi, who originally had some small grievances, suddenly showed a curious look, and he asked.
Although he would be a little unwilling to be taken seriously by others for his hard work, Wang Yi is now more curious about what the system says he has not done well enough.
"Regarding the final tragic story of the protagonist and Zou Xun, you should describe the story more completely, I can feel that your plot is missing a part, those plots that seem more ordinary but can often set off the true feelings, they generally exist in small things, small to see the truth!
After the reader feels the true feelings, there will be the deep love and touching of lovers who sacrifice themselves to fulfill each other!
Also, you are not very good at describing and portraying the details of the fight plot, so everything can only be associated by the reader himself, and the reader cannot be allowed to imagine a complete picture through the text.
However, there are pros and cons to writing about the fight in your work, and readers with good imagination will automatically make up the scene of the fight, and they will not miss the best reading experience. But after all, it can't compare to the realism that you get through reading after you describe the details, the most real feeling that is restored from your heart.
There is a difference between how the reader feels when reading and how the author feels when he writes! Only by restoring the truth in your heart and bringing the reader into your rhythm can the reader read closer to what the author originally wanted to express.
This is something that every good writer should be able to do! And why do some readers scold the author? In addition to those deliberate trolls, it is because of the author's pen power problems or the reader's personal appreciation preferences and abilities that the reader fails to be brought into the author's rhythm and produces a poor reading or enters another feeling that is made up by the reader's own brain and deviates from the author's original intention. ”
The system rebuked Fang Xuan, which had a sense of pointing out the country, and it would give its own views one by one.
"I see!" Wang Yi nodded, looking taught, he felt that he had learned a lot, but he still had some doubts in his heart, and he asked again: "How do I get readers into my rhythm?" What kind of standard is it for readers to read smoothly? ”
"About these, reading smoothly is actually easy to understand, the content of your book is as straightforward and easy to understand as possible, the closer to the truth is actually the better it is to understand, because readers will unconsciously bring their own worldview to analyze and understand what the author writes when reading, and everyone's worldview comes from the real world."
The system first explains Wang Yi's latter question, and then explains the previous question.
"Regarding the second question, in addition to the little white-level readers who have just entered the online literature world and like YY cool articles, most of the battle-hardened old bookworm readers will form a natural habitual rhythm of reading when reading, and everyone's habits will have some differences, and he will continue to compare the things in the book with some memorable similar books he has read in the process of reading, if the comparison wins, he will like your book more, if the comparison loses, then it is not impossible to abandon the book, Most readers abandon the book at such a moment, and even some readers with a bad temper will scold you after abandoning the book.
To solve this situation, I have two options at the moment, write a different style at the beginning, tell the reader that your book is different from everyone else's, so that the reader will be driven by curiosity to read it, and will slowly indulge in it, so that it will naturally bring the reader into your rhythm without fear of unnecessary comparisons from the reader.
The second option is to let your pen power improve and stand up to comparison, so that you are not afraid of comparison!
For example, when the system was reading a novel a few days ago, I saw such a comment.
That novel is written about infinite shuttle streams, and the main world's space-time where the protagonist is located is the interstellar era, and then the reader said that the author's technology tree is not right, and it is obviously an interstellar era, but the technology is still so bad.
And then because the protagonist opened the revival of the mythical era in reality, the ghost or something came out, and the protagonist won the fight with the individual combat mecha on the earth, and the reader said that the author underestimated the technology of the StarCraft era, and a mecha couldn't even beat a warrior.
Later, the author writes about the appearance of ghosts and confrontations with technological weapons, and the reader says that the author's science fiction weapons are too rubbish to even destroy ghosts. He then went on to list some of the technological weapons he had seen in other sci-fi StarCraft novels to argue that technological weapons could destroy ghosts! ”
At this point, the system deliberately stopped, and it couldn't help but laugh a few times before continuing to answer: "From this example, the psychology of this reader is the same as that of most readers, except that this reader's performance represents that he has taken it for granted that he has deviated from the three points of the author's intention.
First of all, the main theme of this novel is time and space travel, and the technological background of the main world can not be too careful, after all, judging from what the author has written so far, the author is writing about the protagonist who travels through the heavens and worlds and then preaches in the main world, rather than writing about the science fiction war of StarCraft.
Second, the contest between mythology and technology was originally imagined by human beings, and technology is weaker than mythology in the author's story setting, which is nothing, and I personally have a personal understanding, but this reader has listed many science fiction weapons from a novel about StarCraft that he has read before to prove that technology is not weaker than mythology.
I think this comparison is completely unnecessary.,It's two novels with different themes.,But that reader insists on making comparisons.,The author is also very helpless!
Third,It's about the author writing that the protagonist and the mecha fought on the earth.,In the end, the protagonist won.,This is probably a sci-fi control.、The reader of the more reasonable party is not satisfied.,He cited a lot of large mecha used in the universe as an example.,Showing that warriors can't beat mechas.,And mecha should be faster-than-light.、Energy weapons with super bull ratios.、Antimatter weapons or something.,It's unreasonable to say that the mecha that fights with the protagonist can only be supersonic speed.。
He simply didn't notice that the author was writing on Earth, not in the universe, and that it was a one-soldier combat mecha, not the kind of large mecha used in interstellar warfare.
Due to the greater influence of gravity and air resistance on the earth, coupled with the performance difference between individual combat mecha and large mecha in the universe, and the demand for the human body quality of individual combat mecha, the mecha on the earth cannot play the same ability as in the universe.
So I don't understand what the reasonable reader thinks about making such unnecessary and boring comparisons.
Therefore, users should pay attention to some, there are always some readers in this world who are more strange, we must understand him, communicate well, and those cognitive differences will be eliminated. ”