Philosophical speculation

Without anyone noticing, Xiang Nanxing had already taken a step back, a little distance from the core area of everyone's sight at this time. At this time, he, like those next to him, was a bystander.

In most people's mindsets, the "sika deer" proposal, although somewhat detached from reality, seems to be a more ethical solution. Sacrificing at most one person can ensure that three people win, and at the same time can avoid a lot of unnecessary conflicts, no matter how you look at it, it is earned. And no matter how you look at "Fox", she is a character who is full of crooked reasoning and forcibly disrupts the situation.

The distortion of facts and the tricks he showed before to win people's hearts are indeed powerful, but the subject in front of him at this time is by no means simple. How can a clearly disinterested plan be interpreted as extremely selfish, self-interested, as he claims? Xiang Nanxing couldn't see through this, so he finally chose not to stand on either side, but kept his distance and observed quietly.

To deal with this, the "fox" used only one hypothesis.

"I remember, Miss 'Sika Deer' came to this rooftop very early." He said lightly, "You're probably the first, and then the 'rabbit', right?" And I'm the third, and I remember that very well. Is that the case? ”

After seeing the other party's helpless nod of affirmation, "Fox" laughed and threw out his biggest killer move.

So, is there such a possibility? Did Miss Sika Deer manage to secretly check the mark on the back of her neck and confirm her identity before I arrived? ”

As soon as he said this, the people who reacted slowly were naturally confused, but several players who reacted quickly immediately followed this train of thought, and even guessed what would happen next. Looking at the posture of "Sika Deer", she is obviously among the people who don't understand, but even if she doesn't figure it out, the other party steps on the door, she must fight back immediately.

"Don't talk nonsense!" She shouted, "You can see it too, I can't take off my hood myself, let alone that part we can't see under normal circumstances, how can I confirm my identity in advance?" ”

"I don't know about this, after all, I just said it, it's just a personal guess, just a guess."

The "fox" shook deeply, which was regarded as an apology, but his next sentence immediately provoked the flames of war again.

"But if I want to speculate, I really don't think it's impossible to say what I just said." As he spoke, he looked at the "rabbit" standing next to him, "Of course, you can't take off your hood or see the mark on the back of your neck if you are alone, but if you are two people, you will have no problem." As I said, I was the third to be there, and I didn't know how long the previous two had been here, and what they were doing before I came. ”

He deliberately accentuated the pronunciation: "There is a mystery, you can imagine it for yourself." ”

"You talk nonsense!"

This time, he directly led the war to the "rabbit" who had not spoken, so the latter couldn't bear it anymore. Although he didn't point out the most critical point, his meaning was actually obvious. Since "Sika Deer" and "Rabbit" were the first two people to come here, only the two of them knew what they did before the third person arrived. And although the setting of the hood makes it impossible for her to take it off herself, if there are two people, this design obviously does not constitute an obstacle.

What the "fox" just pointed out is the possibility of these two people confirming each other's identities.

But seriously, that's all he gained.

"But I don't quite understand, how can I see 'selfishness' here?"

The words of the "Persian cat" spoke to the hearts of several other people. Indeed, if you hide something after confirming your identity, it is not enough to constitute a betrayal, and the impact on the rest of the game is not too great, at most you have eliminated two wrong answers. To say that it is "selfish", this hat is not only too big, but also a little unreasonable.

The "fox", however, replied as if he had been waiting for the question.

"It's normal for you to be incomprehensible, after all, this kind of thinking mode that is superficially fair but actually selfish is the patent of hypocrites."

He smiled and patiently guided the train of thought of the "Persian Cat": "Think about it, if it is really implemented according to her proposal, which kind of person is the most advantageous?" ”

"Well, if we can get rid of the 'mole', the rest of the people can focus on the game, and the number of winners will become three. To put it mildly, it's not fair to the 'mole': I also think this plan is good,"

The "Persian cat" replied cautiously, as if he had been spot-checked by a teacher in class. After saying this, she couldn't help but ask: "And like I just analyzed, this proposal is obviously good for most people, why is it selfish?" ”

"Fox" shook his head.

"Have you heard of Jeremy Bentham?" He suddenly threw out an unfamiliar name.

"Hey, who's this?"

"Pheasant" didn't know when he had come to Xiang Nanxing's side, touched his arm and asked. This is close without warning, you must know that this "pheasant" has no contact with him before, but at this time he suddenly came to talk like an acquaintance, such a mind, it is simply a representative of self-acquaintance.

However, the other party has no malicious intentions, so this side should also reciprocate with kindness. Xiang Nanxing thought for a while and replied in a low voice: "A philosopher, the founder of utilitarian philosophy. ”

"Why are you talking about this all of a sudden? Do you want to drop your bag or show your frame? The "pheasant" made a puzzled sound.

Fortunately, "Fox" quickly went on.

"Bentham is this philosopher." He looked around, "He came up with a utilitarian philosophy to understand good and evil, the 'theory of maximum happiness.'" He said that 'good' is the one that maximizes the total amount of happiness and causes the least pain, while 'evil' is the opposite. According to Bentham, people's emotions are governed by pleasure and suffering, which determine their actions and the actions they will take. This effect is twofold: on the one hand, there is a norm of right and wrong, and on the other hand, there is a chain of causality of behavior. ”

"Pheasant" looked up at Xiang Nanxing, who nodded consciously: "So far, it's not wrong. ”

But what is the purpose of suddenly talking about Bentham at this time? Xiang Nanxing pondered carefully.

The "maximum happiness theory" he talked about at this time simply means sacrificing the interests of a small number of people in exchange for the happiness of more people, which corresponds to the plan proposed by "Sika Deer" just now. If he wants to fight the other side, he has to try to overturn this theory, but this is the point of view put forward by mature philosophers, and how easy is it to confront it head-on?

Unless......

A name suddenly appeared in Xiang Nanxing's mind.

"The next person I'm going to talk about is John Mill."

"Fox" said the name of the person he had in mind at this time. "Mill was also a philosopher, and can be said to be the heir of Bentham." He turned to the "sika deer" and patiently explained, "Before him, Bentham's theory had been criticized by many people. For example, people will take the example of the Colosseum in ancient Rome and point out that the sacrifice of the life of a gladiator in this case can bring pleasure to hundreds of thousands of spectators around him, which should be a good deed according to Bentham's theory, but human morality is obviously unacceptable to this conclusion. Mill pondered a similar question, and later improved on Bentham's theory. ”

He proposed that there is a distinction between high and low levels of pleasure and pain. In the Colosseum example, the gladiator endured the highest level of suffering, but in exchange for the people around him, he received a low level of happiness, which is why this situation cannot be called 'good'. Again, I'm sure everyone participates in this game because they have aspirations that they want to fulfill, but are these aspirations just as advanced? If you can't just equate it, why sacrifice some of these potentially higher aspirations to make way for some of the lower ones? If this happens to you, are you willing? ”

Xiang Nanxing noticed that there were already people around him who had reacted to his words. Both the "mouse" and the "viper" seemed to bow their heads in contemplation, while the "Persian cat" leaned slightly in his direction – a subconscious endorsement from a psychological point of view.

The "fox" paragraph used philosophy to entrap private goods, and in addition to successfully shattering the theoretical basis of the "sika deer" plan, it obviously won a group of believers for itself.

But that wasn't enough, and it seemed that he was going to continue to destroy this woman who might be in the way.

"I ask you." He turned to "Sika Deer": "Do you really think that most people have this kind of thing, is an absolute justice?" ”

Without waiting for the other party to answer, he immediately followed up with another sentence: "Why do you have to sacrifice yourself for the happiness of most people?" Obviously, I didn't make a mistake, but unfortunately became a minority, so why give up my efforts, why don't you fight for your wishes? You said that you want the 'mole' to quit the game voluntarily, which is not in line with human nature at all! ”

"This ......"

was repeatedly asked by the other party in an unprepared situation, and the "sika deer" obviously failed to come back to his senses for a while.

"Back to what I said." "Fox" was unforgiving, and continued, "I'm not targeting you, but for someone who already knows who she is, she can choose what is best for her. If she were the 'mole' herself, I bet she would never have come up with a plan like that! On the other hand, as long as she confirms that she is one of the 'civilians', then the safest solution for her is to get rid of the 'mole' as soon as possible, so as to ensure that she will not lose out because of other players while completing her mission! That's why I say that this plan is extremely selfish, and it is based on the fact that I have more information than others. You can also think about it, if you are unfortunately a 'traitor', are you willing to give up your right to work hard for the sake of others' selfish thoughts! ”

"You talk nonsense!" "Sika Deer" shouted, "I don't know who I am!" ”

"If it's true or not, just look at it!"

A burst of shouting rang out from her side. One hand reached out like lightning and grabbed her shoulder like a pincer, immobilizing her, while the other hand pressed the fingerprint lock on the back of her head.

In the next second, the hood of "Sika Deer" was lifted off, and the long hair was flying!

()

Set a small goal first, such as remembering in 1 second: book guest residence