After Jin Liuni's case was reported locally, it received keen attention from the local judicial department and the Women's Federation. They extended a hand of legal assistance. A lawyer was dispatched to quickly submit a petition to the local people's procuratorate at the request of Jin Liuni. The complaint alleges:

My name is Jin Liuni, 47 years old, and I am an ordinary housewife in Fenghuangling Village. Last year, after the death of my husband Han Dacheng, in order to support this dilapidated home, I supported my four daughters to further their studies at university. According to the many proposals of the field manager Yu Charity, I was asked to work in the brickyard where my husband was alive. After I arrived, I was arranged to do some service chores in the office. After the Chinese New Year this year, on a snowy Sunday, I gave up my vacation (with gratitude) and went to work as usual. During the lunch break, I was on duty in the charity office and fell asleep on the sofa. I don't know when Yu Charity opened the door and came in and wanted to rape. In a panic, I picked up the jade carving beauty on the table and threw it at Yu Charity, and accidentally hit him on the forehead, and this case of negligent injury occurred. After being sued in court, the plaintiff Yu Charity paid a large sum of money to buy witnesses. Fake certificates, fake materials. Reversing right and wrong, confusing black and white, and trampling on justice. Slander me for seducing charity and selling myself for glory in exchange for money. During the trial of the case, the court did not conduct an in-depth investigation and unilaterally accepted false witnesses and false testimony. In the end, I was sentenced to one year and three months in prison. [The verdict is attached] has left me with an unbearable and unwarranted charge. Not only did it affect my personal reputation, but it also seriously affected my daughter's reputation in society. I urgently plead with the People's Procuratorate to uphold justice, make decisions for me, and conduct an in-depth investigation to see if I am using eroticism to seduce charity; Is it "erotica in exchange for 'capital for my daughter to go to college'?" "I fervently hope that the procuratorate will rehabilitate me and restore my reputation......

After receiving Jin Liuni's complaint, the Antu County People's Procuratorate quickly accepted the case. They reviewed the relevant court cases. Relevant witness statements were examined in detail. Personally find Jin Liuni for questioning and talking. and conscientiously checked and checked the on-site inspection and inspection materials of the public security police and the interrogation records of the party Jin Liuni. On the basis of mastering the relevant materials. The prosecutor also interviewed the plaintiff in Charity. Thus many flaws were discovered.

The procuratorate interrogated the plaintiff's witness A through investigation. It was found that A had given false testimony and told a big lie. It does not correspond to the facts of the personal investigation. During the interrogation, the prosecutor solemnly pointed out that there was evidence that Jin Liuni went to work on Sunday was a snowy day. Except for Jin Liuni and the staff on duty in the security department, no one had been to the brickyard before two o'clock in the afternoon. How can you see their ambiguous scenes with your own eyes? A is stumbling, hum, this thing, this thing, it may be someone from the security department, don't see me! A tried to get away with it. In the end, they were debunked one by one by the prosecutors. In front of the law, A had to tell the truth: he really didn't go to the venue that day. The reason why I told a lie and gave false testimony was because my wife, who was a person who was a philanthropist, personally asked me to be a witness and threw out 20,000 yuan as a hardship fee. I didn't dare to offend the boss for fear of being kicked out of the field. He gave false testimony.

When the procuratorate found the plaintiff's witness B, he asked: Did you see the note written by the defendant Jin Liuni to Yu Charity "Boss Yu, I love you"?

B replied: "It was when I got off work in the afternoon, and Yu Charity, the director of the field, asked me to call Jin Liuni to go to the hotel for dinner together. There were two of us plus the boss, and the boss drove quickly to a hotel on the side of the road, drinking and eating. At first, Jin Liuni didn't drink this glass of wine at all. She said, "I don't know how to drink. Yu Charity said unhappily: Drink it, don't be ignorant. Jin Liuni really can't drink, so she choked on the first sip. Yu Charity said, I drank the rest. I'm going to finish the second cup. Jin Liuni ended up drinking three glasses of wine, one glass of white wine, and two glasses of beer. She was a little drunk. At the end of the show, I walked at the back and a note fell out of Jin Liuni's pocket. When I picked it up, it was an ambiguous transaction. It reads: Boss Yu, I love you...... Signed Jin Liuni. B said, "I didn't reveal this note to anyone, so I left it." This time Jin Liuni's east window incident, Mrs. Yu asked me as a witness, saying that Jin Liuni had premeditated to use erotic sex to pull the boss into the water, so I handed over the note I picked up to the court as evidence. ”

The procuratorate used the original copy of the note, together with Jin Liuni's handwriting, to send it to a higher-level public security appraisal agency for evaluation. The appraisal results confirmed that the ambiguous note that testified was not Jin Liuni's authentic handwriting.

Truth. The local people's procuratorate quickly filed a protest with the people's procuratorate at the next higher level. and deliver authentic and valid relevant materials. On the basis of the review, the people's procuratorate at the level above approves the "Report on Submission of Procuratorial Counter-Appeal" and sends it to the people's court at the same level "Procuratorial Counter-Appeal" and related materials, and conducts a second-instance judgment. After the second-instance trial began, the plaintiff's two witnesses quickly retracted their confessions in court, admitting that they had accepted the will of the plaintiff's agent and monetary bribes, and had given false testimony and false confessions.

At the end of the second instance, the court made a judgment: 1. Revoke the erroneous judgment of the first instance; Second, Jin Liuni was found not guilty, exempted from criminal punishment, and her reputation was restored. 3. The plaintiff's party Yu Charity and the plaintiff's two witnesses, A X and X B, are to be handled in a separate case in accordance with relevant laws.

In the second-instance verdict, Jin Liuni shed tears of gratitude. He also bowed and thanked the procurators and judges of the second instance who participated in the trial.