In the chapter, some people scolded me, saying that I should not slander the domestic military industry, and that the Y-8 and its prototype An-12 were not as bad as I said. Pen × fun × Pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 ｉｎｆｏ

Okay, I'm going to get to the point.

First of all, let's talk about the domestic military industry.

In recent years, the rabbit has built all kinds of large-scale constructions, and there are a large number of advanced equipment and equipment units on the sea, land and air, and these achievements cannot be erased.

But if you want to say that the military industrial complex of rabbits is very good, I really don't agree with that.

There are excellent ones, and there are garbage ones.

For example, Cheng Luoma got the J-10 and then the J-20, which is really awesome.

But what about Shen Hoy? In addition to changing the Su-27 series in various ways, what did they do? It's been changed for so many years, but I haven't eaten it thoroughly. Not long ago, a pilot piloted a J-15 crashed and died, and it is said that they failed to solve the defects in the flight control.

When the fourth-generation aircraft was selected, Shen Huoyi also submitted his own plan. The prototype of this plan can even be seen in Shen Huoyi's external propaganda. That plan was a joke, and it almost became our 'T-50'.

In addition to Shen Huoyi, our small arms are also a piece of, and there are too many places that can be blackened.

In fact, there is no mystery in the basic design of small arms, the key is whether it is produced with intention. We have been out of the same model of rifles from different factories, and the magazines are not universal. There have also been cases where the bolt-action sniper rifle bolt was not pulled smoothly.

Don't think it's some hard technique.

This kind of inferior mistake in machining will not be made even by the lowest private enterprises in Jiangsu and Zhejiang, because if you make this kind of mistake, you will immediately have no orders and will not be able to mix.

This kind of is purely a smack-smacking of the factory's management of garbage.

Don't tell me that the country's military industry is great, and under the fame, it is actually difficult to deserve. Garbage is there.

Back to the Y-8.

Let's talk about the Y-8 prototype An-12 first, the prototype of this transport aircraft is the An-10 ......, a passenger aircraft eliminated by Soviet civil aviation.

The Antonov Design Bureau modified the rear fuselage and tail of the An-10, and changed a passenger plane that was not even accepted by civil aviation to the military An-12.

So tell me that the An-12 has a strong field take-off capability? Don't be funny, okay!

Compared with the C-130, the An-12 is scum.

The C-130's field take-off and landing capabilities are recognized worldwide, and it can even take off and land on earthen ground without a runway without any leveling work.

The An-12 and Y-8 do not have short take-off and landing capabilities at all, as their prototypes are passenger aircraft. It's a passenger plane!

The C-130 has an unloaded take-off distance of less than 500 meters, and a heavy-load take-off distance of more than a thousand. Moreover, the C-130 has completed the experiment of taking off and landing on an aircraft carrier, and the C-130's leather durability can be seen.

Change the An-12 and Y-8 to try? Can it withstand the violent pull of catapults and blocking cables? Does the minimum speed meet the requirements for aircraft carrier take-off and landing?

The C-130 has a large wing, a small wing load, and a minimum speed of up to 185 kilometers per hour. What does this mean? Meaning that the C-130 can be converted into a tanker to refuel helicopters.

Can the An-12/Y-8 with a minimum speed of 248 km/h do this job? No, it will crash because of the lack of speed.

The U.S. military has used the C-130 for decades, and it has always been the main force of front-line tactical transport aircraft, which is irreplaceable. This honor is not a fluke.

As for the An-12, the Soviets themselves disliked it. It was decommissioned in the seventies of the last century and was largely replaced by the Il-76.

As for the Rabbit's Y-8, I say something unpleasant, this is a poor imitation of the An-12. The An-12 is bad enough, and the Y-8 is even worse.

Compared with the An-12, the early Y-8 has an empty weight of four tons, a maximum load of five tons less oil, a maximum load of 2.5 tons, a range of 500 kilometers less under the maximum load, and a maximum cruising speed of 120 kilometers per hour. It took more than two decades for these deficiencies to be corrected.

The number of Y-8s built by Rabbit over the years is too small, which is certainly related to the national defense strategy. But such a bad plane, there is really nothing to build.

The military products of the rabbit family are excellent and bad.

If you want me to boast about -8, I can't really boast. Anyway, it's all copying, and it was better to copy the C-130 back then.

If you have different opinions, welcome to come!