readx;?“ I'm glad you're here with Telmi, Mr. Donny Bertram. Pen, fun, pavilion www. biquge。 "14 I did not pay enough attention to your views on the new democratic society, but now I am aware of your talents, and I beg you to come here to serve your country. ”

Downey wears a pair of round-rimmed glasses and is much younger than Wilder. "This is my honor, Duke Jon. Donnie was not happy to come to Telmi, and his son Dominian was sent as a proton at the beginning of the Civil War to show his loyalty to the Wilder family. It wasn't Downey's plan at all to get involved in all of this, he was just a dedicated scholar.

"Tell me, then, how can we organize this revolution to continue to erode our country?" said Jon.

Master Jon, Downey said.

The momentum of democracy is a force we have never experienced before, and it has shaken an entire country from the very foundation of a nation's governance. These democracies may seem invincible in numerical terms, but this is precisely their vulnerability. Its large population base is both its strength and its disadvantage.

In a democracy, everything is divided into separate matters, even if the decision is made by a small number of people, or by a single person. Their thoughts as part of the collective will also subtly influence their behavior, and the decisions they make will inevitably lack decisiveness, sharpness, and even stupidity. All people who belong to the collective will exhibit this disadvantage to a greater or lesser extent, and the inability to unify the ideological policy within the collective has greatly reduced the efficiency and unity of the democratic collective.

In addition to the fact that the collective weakens the individual's characteristics and dulls it, the collective creates features that do not belong to the individual in the first place.

First of all, in all individuals, we do not find cases of sparing no effort to pursue their own interests, and to a greater extent, they will think about the country. But as soon as those initiatives that benefit themselves are labeled as democratic, everyone in the collective goes crazy to pursue them. Such a way of thinking based on quantitative preconceptions allows the ** instinct that was originally not highlighted in the individual to be brought into play, and it is grandly named democracy. Because this is the outcome that most people want, there is no way to find individuals in the vast number of collectives who can be charged with crimes. The natural anonymity of the collective was subconsciously discovered, and the sense of responsibility and morality that had long limited the people's sense of responsibility disappeared. As a result, the democratic collective has become a wealth group that blindly pursues profits, and the beneficiaries are the majority.

The other is the wordless contagion, the contagion of feelings and thoughts is considered commonplace and unexplained. But the spread is faster among the collectives, and many elements contribute to the acceleration of the spread of this evil disease called democracy. And every emotion and behavior in the collective will be infinitely amplified by a successful case of contagion, and in the end it will become a torrent that no one can control. Even the individual will unreservedly give to the collective everything he has, including life, which contains not only his own interests but also the interests of others. A flooded collective will naturally be hostile to other groups of people. This creates another characteristic that is incompatible with human nature, or a part of human nature, which is the wanton destruction of everything that is not beneficial without thinking.

Finally, one of my collective characteristics is that almost all individual characteristics that are identified as human nature in a collective can be reversed.

In a group that is close to each other and interacts frequently, people gradually lose their individual characteristics and even free will. Instead of obeying the collective manipulators who are or are not, or simply establishing collective rules, doing things that are very different from the original individual characteristics. The process of this is very much like that of a victim who has fallen into the hands of an illusionist, and not only does the victim himself have no room to resist, but most of them are not even aware of their situation.

Although the individual characteristics of the people in the collective cannot be displayed, on the other hand, their loyalty, fanaticism, and hatred of the outside world are greatly enhanced. For himself he is no longer conscious, but on the other hand he is the epitome of the collective. While it is not excluded that there are people in the collective who can resist this illusionary contagion and anti-moral character, there are very few of them. But it is precisely because of the existence of this type of people that the democratic collective still maintains a relatively healthy way of behaving, and all the horrors mentioned above have not come true.

So we can see that human beings have become a state of collective unconscious in the collective, and personality traits no longer shine from them. Human beings have since become machines that follow the guidance of the collective unconscious. No matter how scoffing to civilized man, it can be carried out by virtue of collective anonymity and inherent legitimacy.

A person who is caught up in a group will pay more attention to the actions of those around him, and rely on straightforward hints and images rather than the intellect on which he depends for his livelihood. It is easy to be induced to behave in a way that is very different from your original personality. You know, these things have never worked so well on an individual.

From a macro point of view, every member of the council is a wise man with a lot of money, but in the parliament he becomes a timid waste. Every citizen is a simple and kind politician, but he will not hesitate to support the barbaric behavior that is in their best interest, and throw aside the freedom he pursued at the beginning, and turn into a brainless beast.

On the whole, the collective has a tremendous impact on people, turning atheists into religious believers, misers into losers, and cowards into heroes.

To sum up, democratic collectives, while powerful, are fragile in certain situations, and all that is needed is the right approach to keeping the Tours government in control before the democratic collectives evolve into violent gangs controlled by a few.