So, to some extent, the role of Erin Adler is really important to Nicole Kidman.

- This is indeed a bad woman character, but it is full of charm, which is very in line with Nicole's own temperament and characteristics. And "Sherlock Holmes" is another commercial production.

If the interpretation is successful, Nicole Kidman's own commercial value will definitely be greatly improved.

In the original time and space, Nicole Kidman didn't have such a chance-

In the years before and after her divorce from Tom Cruise, she was the most well-known and sympathetic to the audience, and she has been circling in the circle of Austrian cinema.

Although this earned her the title of Oscar-winning actress, it did waste the best opportunity to improve her box office appeal.

After that, she took over the movie "The Golden Compass".

- As a sinkhole magic movie that completely killed the road of the new line film industry's big production, "The Golden Compass" will naturally not let go of Nicole.

Since then, she has confirmed the title of "box office poison", and she has no big fame, but it is difficult to appear in commercial blockbusters again.

And now, in this plane, Nicole Kidman has a different chance......

Of course, Charlotte will find Nicole Kidman to play Erin Adler, not out of some saving plot.

After all, he's not that boring.

What's more, Nicole Kidman, although still beautiful, is not exactly in line with his hobbies.

And his human and wife attributes are not attractive to him.

would choose this Australian woman to star in her own movie, purely for commercial considerations -

After all, Nicole Kidman received quite a lot of attention in the two years before and after her divorce from Tom Cruise.

Among the actresses circled by Charlotte who are more in line with Erin Adler's temperament, she can be said to be the most well-known at present.

However, because the source of her fame is not her previous works, her price is relatively cheap.

From the point of view of film promotion, this is naturally an excellent choice.

Just like in Charlotte's pre-travel world, Amber Heard's divorce from Johnny Depp immediately rose to fame and took the lead role in the DC universe's "Aquaman".

Warner Pictures' calculations are actually no different from Charlotte's now.

- Although in this world, Depp has already reconciled with Winona Ryder, and he should not give Amber Heard another chance.

In fact, in the world before Charlotte, how the wives of Hollywood A-list superstars divorced their strong husbands has almost become a routine.

Especially those wives who are also mixed with Hollywood-

Accusing your husband of domestic violence or alcoholism is common, more often than not, a combination of both.

In this way, it is easy for the woman to form the image of herself as a victim, not only to take the opportunity to harvest a large amount of family property from the man, but also to gain public sympathy, which is conducive to her future career.

From the earliest Nicole Kidman to the later Amber Heard, the techniques are very similar, and even Angelina Jolie, who has always been tough, gave the same statement when she got rid of Brad Pitt.

It can be said that how much a Hollywood A-list male star loves his wife can be seen from the content of the prenuptial agreement and how to deal with the woman's various domestic violence remarks during the divorce.

- From this point of view, Tom Cruise, who has strange beliefs, and John Niedepp, a wanderer, can be said to be good men.

As for Brad Pitt......

However, there are many similar operations, and the public is not stupid - although there are many scumbags in Hollywood, the way scumbags treat their wives can't be exactly the same, right?

Of course, there are real victims among the divorced wives, but there are also some who are simply taking the opportunity to hype, right?

For example, Amber Heard's divorce from Johnny Depp has made many people feel that something is wrong......

Anyway, later, if there was no real hammer, everyone didn't believe so much in some of the remarks made during the divorce battle.

However, considering people's traditional perception and the increasingly powerful feminist movement in the United States, divorce battles between Hollywood stars are generally beneficial to women......

Of course, Charlotte is not a moral judge, and she is not interested in who is more responsible for the failure of Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise's marriage.

He just intends to use Nicole Kidman's surge of attention due to the divorce battle to contribute to the promotion of "Sherlock Holmes".

As for whether Nicole Kidman can take the opportunity to gain greater box office appeal and get rid of the reputation of "box office poison", it has nothing to do with him.

- That's Nicole Kidman's own life, after all.

Therefore, in the script, he didn't give Nicole any preferential treatment - in the rivalry between Sherlock Holmes and Erin Adler, there are several very ridiculous lines-

"So, you don't have a case to investigate for the time being?"

Erin Adler asked Sherlock Holmes, who replied,

"It's like you don't have a husband to cheat on now! How much do you get out of this marriage?"

- According to the original book of "Sherlock Holmes", Erin Adler appeared in the article "Bohemian Scandal" in "History of Adventure", and she is also a shrewd lady who is good at cheating on feelings and marriages and taking advantage of opportunities to obtain money.

So, there was nothing wrong with Holmes questioning her in such words.

- This is actually very much in line with Erin Adler's personality.

However, when the person who plays Erin becomes Nicole Kidman, especially now that she and Tom Cruise are in a divorce battle, these words take on something else.

Anyway, Nicole Kidman's performance has been very good before, but when she got here, she was unnaturally NG twice, which shows that she is quite uncomfortable with this line with the malice of the world.

However, Charlotte has no intention of changing her lines.

On the one hand, this line does fit the relationship and setting between Sherlock Holmes and Erin Adler, and there is no need to modify it.

What's more, in his original world, when Rachel McAdams played Erin Adler, he also had the same line.

- This shows that now Nicole Kidman will encounter such a line, that is, the malice of the world, which has nothing to do with Charlotte's will.

On the other hand, Charlotte did not fail to use these lines to ridicule the intentions of Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise.

At the very least, moviegoers who know the relationship between Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise will definitely find it interesting when they hear these lines.

In particular, when "Sherlock Holmes" is released next year, the divorce battle between the two should come to an end.

- At that time, this line will definitely be more appropriate!

Of course, if it's just such a line, it may indeed make Nicole Kidman feel bad.

- After all, it's as if she's the bad guy.

But combined with the lines in the back, the feeling has changed all of a sudden-