Some book friends raised objections, saying that the protagonist will be smart and stupid for a while, knowing that someone is harming him, and knowing that the plot will be knocked off the cliff, is it a collapse?

Lao Tie made the following explanation.

First of all, the protagonist knows that someone is harming him, but he doesn't know that Lei Gang will use the people around him to deal with him, will you always be wary of your good friend?

There is no such paragraph in the original play, and there is no Shachen at all, so I can't refer to it.

In reality, many smart people and successful people have been stabbed by friends, can you say that they are stupid?

Secondly, the protagonist knows the plot, but can't remember the specific details, and the golden finger of this book is the system, not the memory.

Take Lao Tie as an example, when Lao Tie wrote it himself, after watching the TV series once, he couldn't remember every detail, and he watched it several times before he started writing.

Sure, you can say I'm stupid, but can you say I'm not human?

The protagonist is also a human being, and if he is a human being, he has flaws, weaknesses, and problems of one kind or another.

I know that book friends like to read cool texts, Lao Tie will also try his best to lean in this direction, the basis of cool is the conflict, the more intense the conflict, the more cool it is at the end, the plot has ups and downs, if you are born to blow up the sky, smooth sailing, every second and every second, do you still need to write a novel?

Invincible text, never invincible, when you are invincible in one aspect, it will always make you frustrated in another aspect, for example, some invincible texts, always arrange a supporting role that is not long-eyed to provoke you, and then slap you in the face, if you are really invincible, do you still need to play with them?

True invincibility, the protagonist controls the universe, one thought of the world is born, one thought of the destruction of all beings, in a word, a book, do you read?

This is the setting of contradictions.

It can also be said to be a routine.

When writing each plot, it is not isolated, it is necessary to consider the previous text, and for now, it is necessary to connect the later text, and write this paragraph to pave the way for the later text.

There are only five stories for the zombie Taoist, and a hundred chapters are over, but this book is about Uncle Ying's fusion world, and Lao Tie must consider how to connect seamlessly, and some plots can be connected as a dark line to pave the way, and Lao Tie must use it.

To sum up, the purpose of writing this paragraph is to lay the groundwork for the ups and downs of the plot, the foreshadowing of the later text, the growth of the protagonist, the existence of the golden finger is to give the protagonist a chance to go to the top, whether he can go to the top, the protagonist needs to make efforts himself.

If you don't kill a monster and you don't kill it, how can the system help you?

Necessary setbacks, blows still have to be made, no one can calculate all the organs, and the Red Mansion said that Sister Feng's organs are exhausted, and it is not that she has missed Qingqing's life.

Flood novels often say that saints are calculating, and it is not that there are saints who suffer.

Eat a trench and grow wise, keep maturing, keep growing, and you won't make the same mistakes in the future.

After talking about the plot, let's talk about the book crashing.

collapsed, the plot collapsed, the power system was unbalanced, the style changed hugely and unnaturally, the characters collapsed, and the tone changed 180 degrees, all of which can be regarded as collapses.

But Lao Tie doesn't think that the protagonist collapsed after a little setback. I wrote before that the protagonist is very smart, but his enemies are not inferior, more ruthless, and stronger, in the face of absolute power, intelligence is actually discounted.

Lao Tie didn't write that the protagonist was planted in the hands of a fool who was weaker than himself, so it would not be considered a collapse.

Finally, let's talk about routines.

As soon as a book friend saw the familiar plot in the book, he said that I knew what would happen to the later text, it was too old-fashioned, and the text was abandoned.

The routine is the skeleton of an online text, not a cookie-cutter plagiarism.

This should be clear.

If there is no mature routine support, a book will not be written for a long time, not to mention online writers, it is the book of some big names in the publishing industry, don't they have routines?

The same routine, written by different people and placed in different books, will have different effects and meanings.

Authors are actually innovating writing models, but it is difficult to innovate in routines, because routines are the skeleton of online texts, and a book can easily have millions of words, without the support of a set of mature routines, you can't write it at all, because you don't know what to write.

The great gods with great pen power, they will use gorgeous rhetoric, skillfully arrange the plot, and use rhythm to blur the routine. But if you look closely, you can still find traces of these patterns.

Online articles are all using routines, why some book friends don't like it, because book friends have different preferences, the author's pen power, style, writing, etc., non-routine pot.

said some messy things, just to tell everyone that Lao Tie has a direction in writing essays, and he is not lost for the time being.

Book friends who are still talking about bad routines, you can conceive this book by yourself, you don't have to write it yourself, just think about the type, outline, is there an instant pretense in your head, adventures, harem or something, this is the routine!

The routine is the skeleton, which expands the content and length of the book!

Also, if you have comments and suggestions, you can leave a message in the book review area, Lao Tie will read it, to reply, don't write half of it, what is not good-looking, there is a problem with this book, where is it not good-looking, where is there a problem, you can write it clearly, I just want to lure the author to ask, your routine is also very deep.