Today I met a friend who was reading Haiyan's new book published last year, and I asked him for this book and lent it to me after he finished reading it.

As I talked, I talked about Haiyan's book, the words are so simple, the storyline is not so thrilling, but it is so attractive, so I talked about some of my feelings about writing.

The two of us talked about Lu Xun, the spiritual core and feelings of the writer who made typos throughout the text, and we needed to interpret his words and deeds in the textbooks of primary school after the end of school.

Of course, when that writer writes his own works, I am afraid that he does not think that every word of his words means what he means, and what feelings he expresses are accusing whom?

My friends think that this is the cultural accumulation of other people, as well as the unique environment and feelings of the time.

However, I think that, for example, some people study red science, which is a kind of ability that we have formed since the earliest and the earliest before the earliest to apply to the ability to write books that can be applied to writing now.

The interpretation of the ability to open books can be traced back to the interpretation of the Analects by Confucian students.

And the Analects itself is a kind of ability to open books.

Actually, my understanding is very shallow...... But I guess I have my own ideas!

Of course, I also understand that I don't have enough skills to write this "Crossing Starts from Terraria" like Mo Yan, like Lu Xun, and like Haiyan.

If I had done that, even if it had been a short description of the scene, it would have obscured all the plot I had set up in a long paragraph.

This is actually the difference in level, and the huge insurmountable gap.

When you look at what people write, you feel that even without a word, a punctuation mark is superfluous.

In the same description of a character's dialogue, he may only use the person's actions and behaviors, and then give what he says below, which is more natural and reasonable than you vividly describe the person's form and actions when he speaks.

That's a huge gap! The mountains look up, but they are waved by others.

Later, I thought that I would not be on the same path as others at all, and I had almost too much experience in terms of my own accumulation and experience.

The main thing is that I don't have the eyes to see this subtle thing, and the ability to describe it.

Of course, the above is a free word count.

This is a side proof that I still woke up very early today, and I have been chatting with my friends face-to-face for more than an hour.