Father Sissen had been on the run for a long time—it felt like a long time, and he could not count how long it had been. Pen × fun × Pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 info is not just the oppression given by the monster who came to the world by eroding the witch VV, but also because as the battle begins, there is a hazy mystery that obfuscates his sense of time. If it weren't for Father Edward's legacy, the unspeakable demon in disguise, he would have been unable to secure his actions due to the anomaly of the time reference system.

Fr. Sissen's understanding of time is very simple, as long as a dynamic also has a "process", this process will inevitably involve time, and time is another expression of this dynamic change, so when "time" is impressed, it also proves from the side that the dynamic change in this time period has been actually affected - maybe not all-round, but it must be comprehensive, who called the many main factors that contribute to the whole dynamic change.

Standard time is a subjective examination of the laws of motion of observable things, and the sense of time is the perceptual cognition of the laws of self-motion. Everyone's standard time can be different, however, in the socialization system, a uniform standard time can solve the troubles of many social activities. However, a person's sense of time is different, depending on various factors of their own physiological state changes and instinctive perceptual cognition. Due to the needs of social activities, most people tend to adjust their sense of time to a level close to the standard time as much as possible, but it is impossible to fully conform to the standard time, and the error comes from the limitations of the human body itself and the limitations of people's subjective consciousness of their own cognition and control.

The inability of people to recognize themselves 100% subjectively and control themselves is not a defect, but the result of the evolution of survival instincts from generation to generation. All known human limitations are, in a macroscopic sense, a kind of self-preservation, the boundaries that are confirmed only after the subconscious and subjective initiative of the survival instinct have run into each other. Fr. Sissen understands this from an occult point of view, arguing that it is precisely the result of the limitation of the source of human beings' evolutionary motivation after establishing the "pursuit of knowledge" as the driving force of evolution, in order not to allow themselves to surpass the capacity of the individual and the social collective.

Just as animals and plants have an extremely sensitive survival instinct, so that when they are unable to think, they also have the behavior of seeking good fortune and avoiding evil. Human beings have the same keen instinct for survival, an instinct that has set a red line since before the development of human subjectivity, because this instinct is acutely aware that there are things in the world that can easily destroy the individual and the collective—just as easily as a flood washes away an ant's nest.

It is undisputed that any survival behavior of the ants themselves will offend human beings and be trampled to death, but human beings do not know that they have just stepped on an ant - after the birth of human beings, before the emergence of a sufficiently strong subjective consciousness, the physiological structure formed by the accumulation of human survival instinct and survival experience has set extremely strong restrictions on this subjective consciousness, so as to prevent people from violating those terrible things like ants, without controversy and for granted. And then destroyed by the other party unnoticedly and meaninglessly.

When human beings live in a world that does not know how vast and does not know how terrible predators they hide, it is undoubtedly the right choice to confine themselves to a small area, to be satisfied with only the knowledge of this small area, and to operate this small area under conditions that they and the collective can afford. The contradiction between the subjective desire to expand the circle and the instinctive attempt to shrink the circle has been reflected in various occult and philosophical theories, as well as in modern biology and sociology.

It is not unreasonable for human beings to stand out from the food chain that they do not know how deep they are - or to think that they stand out - and their own limitations are the deep embodiment of this truth, but when the subjective consciousness becomes stronger with the development of ideology, and is so strong that "instinct" is also regarded as a kind of obscurantism and primitiveness, this limitation is regarded by the mainstream consciousness as a kind of imprisonment, rather than a kind of protection.

However, even within the scope of human cognition, such as "time" and "space", human beings themselves are a fragile, short-lived and narrow species with limited space for movement, and human beings feel that the long process of evolution is not worth mentioning from the perspective of the whole universe. When people regard their own limitations as a kind of confinement, and subjectively and strongly want to get out of their own small circle, they do not have the ability to expand and maintain the circle of survival in any way.

Just like the cicada in summer trying to recognize the existence of the four seasons - if the cicada can think, can it detect the clues of the four seasons from its limited visual senses? If it had the same ability to think and observe as humans, would it be able to survive the winter? People often hope that the "efforts of generations" will accumulate a qualitative result, however, if the cicada has the thinking ability and observation ability of human beings, and also has the "efforts of generations of cicadas", can it recognize and feel winter? It turns out that as long as its own limitations are not fully broken, it cannot have a realistic understanding of winter, and it can guess, reasoned and imagined theoretically, but it cannot survive the winter through the efforts of generations of cicadas - before that, they are dead.

Human beings also have similar results to cicadas when faced with changes in things and changes in things that they have never been to and know only from guesses, imaginations, and theoretical inferences, and even unknown things that they cannot even guess, imagine, and reason.

From a harsh, cruel, and perhaps prejudiced point of view, human beings cannot break through their own limitations, even if they have wisdom and systematic thinking, they cannot do this, precisely because cicadas cannot rely on their own efforts to witness the four seasons. The wisdom praised by human beings is magnified into a universe full of unknowns, and it is as small as the "wisdom of the cicada". Even in the eyes of some beings, there is no so-called human wisdom at all, just as people do not recognize the wisdom of cicadas, but only recognize the instincts of cicadas.

People don't think that cicadas are smart, but they recognize the survival instinct of cicadas and their way of behaving in a way that transcends time and perpetuates their race to this day, and they will use their instincts to do something beneficial to themselves - on the other hand, when a certain existence also stands at the same height, like a cicada that people look at, and regard it as a human being, maybe the meaning of human beings to this existence is nothing more.

The above conclusions are never a new argument in the occult and philosophy of mankind, and when human beings consciously think about the problems of themselves and the world, they have been revealed by the ancients in a simple way that stems from the verification and summary of their own instincts. Human thought is continuous, because human society is continuous, and all ideas about cognition of oneself and the world that cognition oneself observes have one or more cores, and these cores have not been established in modern times, but have been shadowed in the thinking and philosophy of the ancients since long ago. Perhaps the role of modern philosophical thought in promoting the progress of human thought does not lie in summing up new laws, but in giving a more precise outline to the argument that has already had a shadow in the past, and forming a way of expression that is easier to be recognized and disseminated by the same kind.

Yes, Fr. Sissen thinks so, that there is no longer any essential progress in the depth of human thought, but the progress in form is obvious.

Thus, instead of delving into the current trends of thought, Fr. Sissen turned to digging deeper into the naïve ideas of the ancients, which is often the way chosen by many talented senior scholars and theologians. Father Edward, of course, did the same, and Father Sissen, who had been taught by Father Edward, went through a similar trajectory to his godfather, abandoning the present forms of thought, extracting the essence of ancient naïve philosophy, and recondensing them into the contours of his own thought - as for why? What do you need? Some people may think that the subjective bias is too heavy, which leads to the distortion of the mind, but of course, Father Sissen has his own criteria: it is precisely because man himself is full of limitations, the things that man can observe and perceive, and the angle from which he observes things, are full of harsh limitations, so man's need for "thought" is actually limited. Specifically, the thoughts that people need are the ones that reveal the things that humans can observe and perceive, and the ideas that are needed to satisfy the perspectives from which they are observed. As a result, there are differences in the things that each person can observe and perceive, and the angle from which they observe things, so the thoughts that each person needs are different. The ideas that the ancients summed up from their own observations are also different from the ideas that people need today.

On the other hand, there is also the argument that "people do not need those ideas that are correct, but beyond the scope of their own observation and cognition", because these thoughts cannot explain what people see and feel, but explain what people cannot see and feel, and when these thoughts enter people's minds, they will have a devastating effect on the logic of people's thinking.

Father Sissen has his own complete and rigorous logic of thought, both metaphysical and metaphysical, which has been integrated with the occult. The concepts of "time" and "space" in his perception are certainly different from most people's common sense, although not diametrically opposed.

Based on these concepts, his description of the terrible monster in front of him, as well as the various phenomena produced by this monster, and even the effects of these phenomena on himself, are all different from most people's common sense, and even different from anyone except him.

His standards and sensibilities are extremely personal and self-contained, but they do help him to identify as much as possible the mysterious and unknown enemy in front of him, as well as those mysterious phenomena. Fr. Edward's legacy does not fit into Fr. Sissen's unique system, but it is undeniable that Fr. Edward's many years of teaching and deeds have allowed his system to occupy a very basic and important position in Fr. Sissen's system. Thus, this heritage is inherited and transformed, however, the process takes time.

Father Sissen's use of this amorphous demon in disguise, the One of All Things, was crude and inefficient for the long time he perceived, and if its power was limited, then he was wasting its power on situations that were less important and less friendly. It's just that there's nothing you can do about it. Until the One is truly integrated into Father Sissen's system, Father Sissen will not even be able to actively observe the enemy through his eyes, control his behavior, or even confirm his existence at all times.

As the supreme masterpiece of Father Edward's mysterious "Nine Hundred and Nine Disguises", the One of All Things has the power to surpass Father Sissen's own limitations, if the One of All Things is a dead thing, it will probably make Father Sissen's situation slightly better, however, since the One of All Things is a demon in disguise, after Father Edward's death, its form is closer to the original Gray Mist Demon. All occult experts know that the Grey Mist Demon has its own consciousness and intelligence, so even if the relationship between Father Edward and Father Sissen is limited, and cannot completely abandon Father Sissen's independent exercise of his subjective will, he will not fully obey Father Sissen's subjective will.

The various phenomena created by this amorphous demon in disguise cover Father Sissen and the monster that occupies the body of the witch VV, but it is slightly biased towards Father Sissen, and it is this bias that allows Father Sissen to buy more time and not quickly fall to the monster in front of him.

The mystical power of the range severed the connection between Father Sissen's magic pattern and the security network, and its effect was so good that Father Sissen suspected that the entire area of the Ruling Bureau where he was located was under influence, which meant that this area had become an independent battlefield, not only could the information from this side not be transmitted, but also the reinforcements from outside could not enter. Father Sissen only felt that he was trapped in a cage, like a bird in a cage, with nowhere to escape, a hidden inevitability that was eroding his mind - allowing him to breed out of that almost agnostic thought an inevitability that is difficult for intelligent life to accept.