Strong warning: The content of this chapter has nothing to do with the main story!!

It is not recommended to subscribe to this chapter!

It is not recommended to subscribe to this chapter!

It is not recommended to subscribe to this chapter!

I'd like to talk about what I've been up to for the past few days and why I haven't updated it. Before I get into that, let's talk about whether the story after the tsunami will be written.

The answer is:

Option 1: A small probability of being a direct eunuch. Even if it's a eunuch, the flow of the story behind me will be put up. Because I looked at the book review area and the readership, in addition to the readers who are reading, there are also authors who are reading, which can be a reference in the setting.

Option 2: Most likely, I will continue to write, but probably not in the same style as I do now. As for what kind of style it is, and the reasons for it, I will explain it at the end.

In the past few days, I have watched a lot of excellent story works, mainly including "Attack on Titan" (chapters 1 to 93), the script and behind-the-scenes of "The Last of Us", the original setting of "Cangzhitao", "Crickets in Times Square" (cough cough, these are not online articles), online articles are: "The World of Movies", "Wasteland Rise", "Abnormal Creatures" and Strong! Violent! No! Push! Recommend! "That Night, I Did It", "My Extreme%Quality%Jiao%Wife", "Those Days I Was Raised%%", "Peach%Flower%Divine Doctor", "Extreme%Ring", "Dark God", etc......

The above stories are all very good works. Yes, including books that are not recommended for minors, all of them are excellent.

Either they have excellent commercial value (sold for a lot of money), or they have excellent reviews (applause, awards), or both.

So, when I finished reading these works during the day and started to build my own story world at night......

Here's the trouble.

I don't think my story is as good as any of the above, and it's quite a big gap.

It's not me, it's actually that I really don't realize the problems with my story.

When I started writing this book (even though I already had a good book on eunuchs) I wasn't aware of the problem. (I've always thought that the books I wrote were stupid and good)

In fact, the amount of reading of my stories, especially online stories, is far less than that of you in front of the screen.

Because the list of books that I can pay to read is very different from yours.

A large number of books listed above,I only saw the three starting books before they were put on the shelves (because I didn't like to read them.,I just want to see why others write well),4 non-online stories I bought with money.,It's also a paid user.,But in fact, I don't particularly like it.,I just want to see how far I am from the best story works.。

The books I really want to read like the Internet are probably like "Out of Control", "Inevitability", "Positioning", "Deep Learning", "Deliberate Practice", "The Beauty of Mathematics" (which I have recommended to you before), "The Limit of Growth", "The History of Crazy Human Evolution", "Story", "How to Read a Book", "Plot and Characters", "Story Mechanics", ......

These are the ones I read recently, and if I had to push them, I would just say I liked them.

In other words, I have always been far away from "storytelling".

As you may have discovered, the story of the tsunami is related to scientific theories (e.g. the causes of the tsunami, the principle of the nuclear explosion, history, geography...... Whether it's serious nonsense or some well-founded popular science, the chapters have a lot of words and the logic is smoother.

In fact, because it is written very quickly, in one go, it doesn't need to go through the brain, it's all already in the head.

But when the plot is written, it is actually very sad.

It's just sad.

In order to install a villain, such as the logically confused Alex (remember this villain) (in fact, when I wrote this, I was going crazy, I guess I should add a villain's story, but I can't write it at all, so this is a villain who was forcibly added) (such as the much-criticized Lieutenant General Nie Xing in the book (this is a big problem, I'll talk about it slowly)). You can find that most of the "villains" dealt with by the protagonist Lao Xu in the book are basically not people.

In this book, there is no person who makes Xu Liang slap his face at all.

What are most of the "villains"?

Tsunami (several times, 1 time, 2 times, 3 times)

plane

missile

aircraft carrier

boat

rabbit

ant

dragonfly

Duanhan's sister's feet smell

All the villains, so! Yes! Target! - All of them were added by me because I thought that "if you don't write about villains in online articles, you won't be subscribed".

I didn't even want to write about these villains. I don't want to write about any of them!

So, if the villain is not human, it would be better to write some?

In short, because of the reasons above. So in the book you see, almost all of the problems solved by the protagonist Lao Xu are related to the natural environment.

Actually, I just wanted to write a worldview.

A possible picture of human civilization in the universe.

That's what I want to write.

I just want to write about the worldview and nothing else.

But at the same time, I knew that stories couldn't be written like that. Because, all successful online literary works must not write about these, or in other words, these things must not be selling points. The selling point must be to upgrade and fight monsters, pretend to be forced to slap the face, heroes save the United States, and domineering presidents......

This is a contradiction at the core.

I only know that I can make money writing these things, but I don't know exactly how to write them, and at the same time, I want to write about what I like, so the contradiction is more and more prominent.

On the one hand, I want to write about scientific theories that I like; On the other hand, I'm going to add elements of all kinds of online articles that I like to see.

So, in the first 300 words of the article, you saw a slightly yellow plot of Xu Liang flirting with a beautiful woman (but in fact, I didn't want to write it, and the whole book only consulted an old driver to write a chapter between Lala, or as a joke rather than to provoke hormones)

Therefore, I read a lot of storytelling theory books, and wrote the first story of about 20,000 (that is, the paragraph from the first tsunami to the protagonist starting to look for clues (this 20,000-word outline has four or five thousand words))

So, I added a lot of villains to this book (much more than in my previous book, there was only one minion, a squad leader and a boss, and three monsters in the first 300,000 words of the previous book), and I wrote more than ten of them this time.

There are all kinds of so, and in the end, such a book came out, which is a wonderful fusion of various elements.

Of course, there is no doubt that the results are not good.

So, when I'm watching other people's excellent works these days, I've been thinking about the tsunami story all the time.

How should I present this story? (Actually, this is not a story, just a worldview)

The most important are:

Write something I like?

Or write something that readers like?

Write something I like? - I know this thing is not profitable.

Write something that readers like? - Because I have a small amount of reading on the Internet, I don't know what books you all like to read. I can only guess from the most macro elements, and the final result is certainly not good.

So it leads to what I want to write later: neither what I like (because later I feel that according to the current rhythm, I am going to fight monsters, so annoying, I don't want to fight monsters), and it is not what readers like (I won't write upgrades to fight monsters at all).

Well, write an essay that readers don't like either, and I don't like either......

I'll write a yarn!

So, there was finally such a long hiatus.

The above is the reason for the break.

However, as mentioned at the beginning, there is a high probability that this story will be written, but the form and style will be different. That's because I've made a choice between what I like and what readers like.

I choose "what I like".

The reason why I didn't choose "what you like" is that I really don't know what you readers like, I can only guess and guess, and guess according to my superficial understanding of online literature, how to guess, and the results are also presented, and the results are not good (in fact, it is okay, but it is really not good).

So, I just write what I like.

So, what does it look like to write about something I like...... If you look at the list of books I read, you may be able to guess - for the vast majority of readers, it is probably something that is particularly boring, storyless, and frustrating, which is certain, certain, undoubted. So the few remaining readers may just like what I've written, so they might continue to read it?

I'm not sure if there are such readers.

But what I'm going to do behind is bound to be more fragmented, and I won't be thinking about the reader's reading experience.

What is the reading experience?

"Scene" + "Character" + "Villain" + "Solve the Villain" is a better reading experience.

"Scene" + "Male" + "Female" + "Dry Firewood" is also a good reading experience.

Contrarily:

"The setting of a large paragraph" + "world background" + "the author's complaints" + "all kinds of strange things don't do business" is a bad reading experience.

But this kind of bad reading experience, I write more easily. Because I like it.

That's what I'm going to write about later.

But as an online writer, I originally wrote articles at the starting point to make money, and since I wanted to make money, I had to write "what readers like", which is hard logic. Since this is hard logic, why not pick this option? Because I really can't (concubines can't do it).

I'm not the one who writes online articles!

So, since it's not that material, I can only grind it slowly - I have to spend a lot of time again to see why the popular books written by others are popular, read more online articles, and then follow the example, make an outline (such as the books above that are strongly not recommended for minors), and then add them to my work little by little. But forget about this one, because it's really too hard for me.

This book is basically for me to complete my premise.

Why write so much of the above?

Because I'm here, I sincerely don't recommend that you continue to subscribe to the later parts, although I haven't started to write the next things, but I believe that those things in my head must be miserable. There's no need to waste your starting coins. (I feel like I must be the only one of the starting point authors who doesn't recommend a reader subscription).

And then, why don't readers subscribe to me and keep writing? Two reasons, 1, I should finish this book after completing this worldview of mine, because it is too painful to write. 2, I have a full attendance, right? (Of course, there should be no more this month) 3, leave a possibility, in case I suddenly write better again, I will delete this testimonial, and you will see a good book again. (Well, how did it become three reasons?) ）

If I think about it, if that's the case, I'm basically done with what I want to say.

Again, it's not recommended to subscribe to the rest of the book (unless you really like it, or one day I think I've written it well and delete the chapter)

I imagine there's nothing left unsaid.

Oh yes, Lieutenant General Nie Xing's part. It's simply criticized. Tell me about my journey.

Actually, I was quite depressed.

I only wrote half of this episode.

Follow the basic format for writing a story. It should be repressive - reversed, like this.

In the story of Lieutenant General Nie Xing, it should be

The enemy suppresses the protagonist - the protagonist overturns the enemy, this structure.

The more ruthless the suppression, the more intense the rebound, and the more refreshing it is to watch.

However, the accidental, that is, the depressing part is that when this plot was written, it was in time for "19da". Shielded me. That is, around Chapter 60.

This leads to the fact that the repression is enough repression, and the part of the rebound is all swallowed up. Can't write it.

I'm uncomfortable myself.

Further on:

Why should a good science fiction article add such a plot that seems abrupt?

Reason 1: When writing this plot, "Wolf Warrior 2" was very popular and wanted to rub a patriotic hotspot (secondary reason)

Reason 2: I want to practice writing a villain who is a little more complicated, rather than jumping out and shouting - a villain who is defeated by the protagonist in such a process. It turns out that I did write it out?

Originally, such a villain was portrayed with a lot of effort, and after the whitewashing, we could have adventures together and be high, but after blocking my chapter, I had to temporarily add the role of an assistant, and then "reasonably" kill you Lieutenant General Nie Xing, and the plot will end. (Main Reason)

That's the whole origin of this awkward plot.

Because the vast majority of readers are expected (not many in total?) I won't be subscribing to the next tsunami, but I'd like to see if there's anything else I haven't explained.

Oh yes, the rabbit in our company is dead. The death was extremely miserable (the reason is unknown), so I didn't eat it, and I dug a pit and buried it.

Oh yes, and then let's talk about the main ones in the back of the book:

- About the setting of Civilization Arena (yes, I plan to skip the monster fighting that I think is boring, but maybe the reader wants to fight monsters and write directly about the Civilization Arena)

-- The struggle between human civilization and undersea civilization

- Enter the underground space and discover the unimaginable preparation of the underwater civilization

- Fight for supremacy in the solar system

- Compete for hegemony with "the being who gave the key to human civilization".

It's probably an order with a lot of details and settings in my outline, and it's going to be presented in a very bad, unfriendly way to (maybe it still exists?). Readers.

And the plot will progress very quickly (because it doesn't count the muscles and fat that fill in the plot, and directly give the bones, that is, the driest part, to the reader).

It doesn't seem like much.

Well, just sauce.

Oh yes, and, thank you to the readers who have always supported me (I read all the book reviews that scolded me)

Also, if you really subscribe, reward, or something, I'm also very welcome!!!

The book isn't over yet!!!

Well, it's really sauce.

————

10 minutes after updating the testimonials in this chapter, add:

I wipe me wipe I wipe rub, I haven't been in the background for several days, open the background data and see, why are there so many new subscriptions? Are there still many people who want to read my book? I've been struggling for a long time, and I've made up my mind......

It's over, it's tangled again, readers, what should I do, do I have to continue to write seriously, tangled, and painfully what I don't like......