"Sherlock Holmes Crime and Punishment" When everyone's game progress reaches the fifth chapter, many people will have a doubt, that is, about the accomplice in the fifth chapter of the game, many people think that the son is very suspicious, but why is he a gold worshipper?!

In terms of time, both of them have plenty of time, and in terms of motivation, I personally think that the motivation of the gold worshipper is greater than that of the son, after all, she was abandoned and the son would not kill his father because of this. I wonder if there is any evidence and not motivation to prove that it is a female accomplice

I also think it should be the son, first of all, according to you, the modus operandi of this case actually only requires the son to lock the door for 10 minutes, and then the vice president can turn on the switch to complete, which means that the son does not need any botanical knowledge, and the vice president can be in charge

Secondly, the number 320 tape on the gramophone of the female college student can provide her alibi at the time, how can she go to another room and lock the door while recording for a long time?

This is the only thing I haven't figured out in the whole game, and I'm curious why no one asks this question.

My personal understanding: the breakthrough is the murderer's suicide (of course, the premise is suicide and not the accomplice's homicide, which should prove that it will not be expanded here), if the son is an accomplice, how can he force the murderer to commit suicide? Because the murderer actually despised this son who did not understand botany, thinking that he was a wreck (as proved from the beginning of the case), logically the murderer would not be forced to commit suicide by this son.

But the money worshipper is different, the murderer values and even loves her very, very much (from conversations and letters?). can be felt), the money worshipper can control the murderer's love for her and even force him to commit suicide. His suicide note after his suicide can also show that the murderer committed suicide largely because he wanted to take all the blame on himself, and the case was over, so that the other accomplice would not be implicated (the murderer would never do this for the son of the enemy he looked down on), but on the contrary, it was self-defeating and aroused Fu's suspicions.

So logically, it can only be that the money worshipper is an accomplice, otherwise the murderer commits suicide very illogically. But I think there are a lot of things in the game here that deliberately confuse the player's judgment:

The son has the motive to commit the crime, the humiliation of his father and the shattering of his dreams (of course, it is a bit far-fetched, but at least there is), and he also has the ability to commit the crime in time and behavior, but with the simple act of closing the door, he can do it.

And the gold-worshipping girl has an alibi.,The gramophone tape that has been recorded (I'm curious why Holmes won't listen to it after listening to it.,According to the Chinese version, I only say I'm not interested in something.,There's no need to listen to it.,In fact, according to the results, I can only think that this tape is a forged evidence.,That is, the gold-worshipping girl recorded it in advance.,But in the process of investigating the game,Sherlock Holmes fooled the past lightly.,I think this can only be explained as a blind eye to confuse the player to choose his son.,This blind eye is very far-fetched.,It's very confusing, but it's very confusing)

The above is based on the analysis of the Chinese version.,Because there are still a lot of mistakes in the sinicization.,So maybe some key evidence or clues are missing due to the sinicization.。

1. Red eyes

2. The deputy director and Albert are hostile to each other and will not be partners in killing

3. Albert had little motive to kill, just because his father was against him going to the Naval Academy? It would be even more unrealistic to say that he killed his father in order to be a supervisor. For with his botanical knowledge it is not his turn. Not to mention partnering with his own competitors to kill his own father. He wants to kill and kill the deputy director.

4. The deputy director's suicide note is also corroborative, because he took all the charges. If he was forced to death by Albert, would the deputy director shelter someone who had forced himself to death and who he didn't like

Interested players can find more clues. For example, compare the size of the two remaining chemical protective suits in the cabinet. There are a lot of small details in the game that should provide proof.

I would like to mention a personal guess, which is that the leader of the Holy Syndicate said that he sent someone to steal the plant, and he used to describe the person who sent it as "she". If there is nothing wrong with sinicization here,Then this woman named White is quite suspicious.,It's very likely that she is a member of this organization.,And participated in the theft of plants.,Otherwise, why were these plants stolen? This coincidence is also too suspicious. Moreover, this syndicate is a drug cartel, so it is very likely that White is a drug addict, which also explains why her expenses are so large, and the reason why the victim stopped giving her financial support has something to do with it. Let's take a look at the timeline again, why White is said to be a prisoner with 20 minutes, because she also stole the plants from the booth when she closed the door! The plant must have not been stolen before the victim died, otherwise he must have been busy reporting the crime, and there would be no chance to kill him, and it would not be so easy to steal after death, after all, it was a crime scene. Albert couldn't go and close the door, because if he did, he would run into a plant thief. That's probably it, I don't know if the analysis is right?

In retrospect, this woman was really terrible, and the mutilated bust of the victim found in the deputy director's studio during the initial investigation was supposed to be what she put in, the purpose was to leave clues for the detective and betray the deputy director, and the deputy director was stupid enough to cover her suicide... also knew that by making an alibi for himself, even Sherlock Holmes was almost deceived.