Vivian didn't answer, just found out the information of the case at that time, in order to make it easier for Li Ting to look through it, printed out the document, and downloaded the video directly to the computer desktop, and after doing all this, she silently got up and returned to the suite. Pen "Fun" Pavilion www.biquge.info

Regarding Li Ting's question, she didn't know how to answer, as a law enforcer, of course, she knew that she had the responsibility and obligation not to let go of any criminal, but as a law enforcer within the organization, she also knew that many times, things were not as simple as they sounded.

The organization is like a huge machine, constantly operating according to the rules, and it includes not only the people who use the rules like the enforcers, but also the people in power who make the rules, the supervisors who supervise the use of the rules by the enforcers and the people in power who make the rules, and those who constantly use the loopholes in the rules to seek power.

Rules, which appear noble and humble in the organization, are noble in the fact that everyone shouts that they regard it as their basic standard of life, and it is humble when everyone curses that it is a toy in the hands of those in power, a boring trick of the capitalists when their own interests are harmed.

But the rules are wrong, it's right, it's really just a track that was made to maintain the organization of this machine to continue to run, just like the track on which a train runs, so it, is it wrong?

Even if it's really wrong, who is at fault? Is it the rules themselves, or is it the people in power who made the rules in the first place?

But if you think about it, what sane person in power would completely ignore public opinion, wantonly destroy the original rules, and add their own new gadgets? What person in power doesn't try to hold that power in his own hands for a moment?

But if the rules are wantonly broken, will public opinion still be suppressed? I am afraid that I have long lost the will of the people, and the will of the people has been lost, is there any difference between the word power and absurdity? Will those in power really like such absurd power?

But if those in power are not wrong, who is at fault? Or who caused this case to get to this point? Is it yourself who are the enforcers of the rules, or are you the overseers, or is it really just because of that fluttering piece of paper and the leisurely mouths of society?

Vivien pressed her whole head under the pillow, thinking wildly, she not only wanted to give Li Ting an answer, but also wanted to give herself an answer, who is this law, this justice for, and who should she be responsible for in the end.

And Li Ting was watching the old case with relish at this time.

The case occurred nine years ago, when Fan Shen was only 14 years old and in the sixth grade of primary school, and the victims were his classmates and a number of teachers, among whom the most seriously injured was his tablemate, Meng Qing, a repeater who was only a year older than him but looked much stronger than him.

According to Meng Qing's transcript at the time, Fan Shen in the self-study class suddenly began to attack himself for some reason, accompanied by biting, and the classmates stepped forward to stop him, and they also became the target of his attack. In the transcript, when the police asked Fan Shen if he usually had any unusual state and behavior, Meng Qing said that Fan Shen was usually silent in the class and did not have outstanding abilities and scores, so everyone did not communicate with him much, and as a tablemate, there was no more communication with him, so he did not feel that he had any unusual behavior and words.

Li Ting continued to look through the other transcripts and confession backups, and found that the evaluation of Fan Shen in them was surprisingly consistent, and these similar transcripts made the corners of Li Ting's mouth unconsciously hooked.