When the prosecutor read out the indictment, the audience was silent. Most of the contents of the indictment were familiar to all those present, and the facts of the case were reported in detail on television and in newspapers, but everyone still listened very carefully.

After the prosecutor finished reading out the facts of the indictment, some angry voices suddenly came from the audience:

"It's a loss of conscience."

"A thousand cuts have cheapened this brute."

"I even have the face to ask for a lawyer."

"This lawyer is a jerk too."

"The lawyer is blind."

"You can't blame the lawyer, that's what the lawyer does -- the lawyer also needs to eat."

Because the scene was very quiet, the few words blurted out by a few people sounded so clear.

Mr. Li's eyes kept blinking like flashing the lights, and Zhang Tonglin's face was red and white for a while. Lawyer Zhang may not have experienced this situation, and to be honest, it takes some courage and courage to take on this kind of case.

Ma Wenjing choked in a low voice.

It took three blows from the gavel that the synagogue fell silent.

This is followed by the prosecutor's submissions.

Regarding the facts of the case, the author will not repeat it, and the author will only explain the content of the last paragraph of the indictment (the part of the statement of opinions): "The presiding judge and the murderer Li Dongting confessed to the facts of the crime of killing Liu Xiaoyu's family of three and seeking money and killing him, the facts of the crime are clear, the evidence of the crime is conclusive, and the circumstances are particularly serious, which is really a heinous crime. The prosecutor finally emphasized three points: first, Li Dongting killed his colleague, Liu Xiaoyu, a teacher who had retired at home, and killed his own students (the deceased Chen Qidi in this case was Li Dongting's student), and the methods were extremely cruel, to the point of madness and outrageousness; Second, before committing the crime, Li Dongting had clear thinking, careful planning, and interlocking, and before committing the crime, the murderer knew the living habits of Teacher Liu's family, the environment and weather of Teacher Liu's family, including Teacher Liu's personality and the time when Chen Qiming and Chen Qidi sisters got out of school. Third, before leaving the crime scene, Li Dongting conscientiously dealt with the traces of the crime that might have been left behind -- fingerprints and shoe prints, which shows that Li Dongting has a very strong anti-reconnaissance capability, and that the murderer covered his face with a yellow raincoat when he entered the crime scene and when he left the crime scene. Take it in stride, and take it in stride when eradicating traces of crime.

Based on the above statements, the public prosecutor asked the court to sentence Li Dongting to death and deprive him of his political rights for life, so that the soul of the deceased can rest in peace, the soul of the living can be comforted, social justice can be upheld, and the dignity of the law can be upheld. ”

When the prosecutor finished reading the indictment, the audience was silent, I don't know who applauded a few times, which led to many people applauding at once, and finally, everyone in the audience applauded.

Mr. Li and Qian Chongwei had blank expressions and gloomy faces.

Zhang Tonglin seemed to feel something, his face suddenly became gloomy, probably because the lenses were blurry, Zhang Tonglin kept wiping the lenses.

The statement of opinions in the indictment has fully and forcefully paved the way for the subsequent court debate. "Before Li Dongting committed the crime, he had clear thinking, careful planning, and interlocking."; The motive is clear, the preparation is sufficient, the thinking is thorough, and the crime is methodical; Eliminate the traces of crime in a calm manner. The conclusion fundamentally negates all of Zhang Tonglin's arguments for Li Dongting's acquittal -- or misdemeanor --