After the price code that Ren Di said in the conference room was reported to the Central Committee, after discussion by Zhao Weiguo and a series of Standing Committee members, this price code that could not be agreed to in the south was supplemented by brainstorming. It was then published in the People's Daily on this plane. Of course, Ren Di's explanation is also attached. "The price paid by the workers and peasants was a war with heavy casualties, not a march and strike in the streets. From the outset, this price was paid for the right of the workers and peasants to rule, not for the loosening of economic chains. ”

"I'm doing the right thing right now." Ren Di can also be regarded as trying to understand a problem. The difference between the two revolutionaries. In any case, as long as the direction of change is more suitable for the development of productive forces and more equality between people, then this change is right. The people who demand this change are progressives.

But not all progressives are in the same position in this transformation. The people who lead the change must be the ones who pay the price to break down the barriers, and if the Ming Parliament took the initiative to raise workers' wages five years ago, the parliament took the initiative to demand rent and interest cuts. Then the price paid by the Ming government and the power it has deservedly have absolute leadership over this forward change. But the Ming Dynasty did not do this, because it did not change the national price of raw material labor export, it was the national of the entire Ming Empire, not the master of the Ming Parliament. So they're too sluggish. The whole country has given them enough time.

And this can also explain the justice of the last wave of time-travelers seventy years ago, when they were the most advanced forces, bringing cross-era industries, transcending advanced systems, and they had the right of destiny to dominate the changes in this world. The ambitions of the first generation of patriarchs can be recorded in history. However, the destiny of human beings is to move forward, when the former leader stopped, began to prepare to sit on the country, but did not want to give up the leadership, the contradiction between the forward force and the non-forward force of human society became more and more prominent. That's why the evolutionary battlefield calculates that the stability of the plane has decreased sharply in order to put Zhao Weiguo and Ren Di and other evolutionary officers down in an extremely covert way. And now, because of the plane, the people who pay the most for this change are the workers and peasants who have been instigated by Zhao Weiguo and other new time-travelers.

The price paid by the workers and peasants for their advance was not marching and trying to join the parliament to express their opinions, and the two peaceful paths mentioned above had been blocked by the councils of the Ming Dynasty. The capital accumulation of the Ming Dynasty is far from reaching the point of loosening the shackles in order to take the initiative to alleviate the contradictions. This situation has not been reached by Haisong, which has encroached on the entire Daming market.

Of course, if the people who want change at this time just take to the streets and shout, just to show their determination to demand change in this way, then they deserve to be suppressed. It is simply impossible to challenge the dominant power of the upper bourgeoisie over social change. But now the situation is different. The class intent on change is now the workers' and peasants' class, which has been organized by the workers' and peasants' party, accounting for more than 90 percent of the total population of the Ming Dynasty, and this class has shown its determination to change at the cost of war. Moreover, having the ability to defeat the bourgeoisie, which has a weak power for change, the right to lead the advance of the whole of China should be borne by this class.

Now the Workers' and Peasants' Party does not have to worry about whether it has enough power to take power, and whether it is absolutely enough, but whether it will betray the class that has given it the power to change. Many peasant uprisings in history betrayed the original desire of the rebels to demand fair treatment of the peasant class by the government under the habitual thinking of the upper echelons sitting on the throne and grabbing the throne and grabbing the dragon chair.

Ren Di, who was now concentrating on the task of this plane evolutionary, could no longer tolerate any betrayal of his initial efforts. Since the Workers' and Peasants' Party is positioned as a steward. Then there must be a difference between the internal system and the law that binds ordinary people.

Ren Di saw such a joke on the Internet before he crossed over

Someone burglarized, just entered the house, the hostess came back, he hid under the bed, but was still found, so he violently resisted arrest and fled, and was arrested.

The normal sentence is then a burglary, at least 10 years.

If this person was a law student, then he would have changed his confession that he had entered the house with the intention of rape, and finally tried for three years for attempted rape, because the crime of rape had nothing to do with whether or not he entered the house.

If the person is a law graduate student, then he will change it like this, and when he wants to rape, he finds that the woman is extremely ugly, and he runs away, and finally he can be deemed to have stopped the rape, and because there is no harmful consequence, he may be exempted from criminal punishment.

If it was a doctor of criminal law, he would change it like this, he fell in love with the male owner and wanted to rape him, but he didn't expect the hostess to come back first. Because the criminal law does not stipulate that rape of a man is a crime, the man was acquitted in the second instance.

Ren Di just laughed at this joke at the time. But now it has to be a heavy question. Although the rules appear to be fair, people with different levels of familiarity with the rules are not. Just like people who are familiar with the rules of nature and learn to use fire, then it is unfair to animals.

There are two kinds of rules that human beings have to learn in this world, the first rule is the rule of natural matter, which is the modern natural science, and the second rule is the rule of getting along with people. However, the development of the second rule is based on the fact that human beings are better able to explore the first rule. The direction of all social and legal development is to enable greater development of the social productive forces.

Therefore, the first rule should be the rule that society primarily encourages learning. This is the natural sciences. There was a time when the history of classical China came to a fork in the road, and this fork in the road was that society abandoned the search for one rule and turned to the search for the second. Everything is inferior, but reading is high. The most successful thing in life is to sit in the official position and be an official who can manage the people. The search for the second rule to the extreme is the abolition of the first rule, and the natural sciences lag far behind the West. The means of controlling the people became the standard of talent, and the complex officialdom culture that led the world at that time was born. This kind of officialdom culture is probably only comparable to the house of cards scene in the parliamentary era of the 21st century.

We must know the relationship between people, but we must not waste our understanding of the natural sciences. However, due to technological means, if the judgment in the relationship between people is weaker, then it will suffer. For example, in the above joke, if the scene at that time was recorded in all directions, and the memory of the offender's thoughts at the time could be read, there would be no legal quibble. In the final analysis, it is the lack of technology that has created the flexibility to find a gap between the laws of the second rule.

This is ancient China, although the laws of the Ming Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty are standardized, but the county magistrate can influence the judgment according to his own preferences and the relationship between the local squire. Under the rules of the law, it is inherently unfair, and only those who are familiar with the rules have the advantage. However, everyone came to familiarize themselves with the rules in this area and tried to drill the camp, but the importance of natural science was abandoned, and the honest people who studied natural science suffered a loss, and they could not get the fair protection of everyone for the original purpose of the law, and the society was abolished.

Ren Di, a former democrat, now has to admit that the democratic parliament is not as fair as the one-party rule that he has seen. Just like the current Hai Song, it is also the same set of laws that bind everyone. But basically in the House of Commons, there are a large number of Juris Doctors. The nobles of the Hai Song Dynasty in the House of Lords were all big industrialists, and they all employed special legal experts. They are the makers of the law, and the law is either made by these people or understood by these people who have studied hard for 20 years. They are far more familiar with the art of managing society than the rest of society as a whole.

The academy in the Harry Potter novels is an allusion to the law school in England at the time.

Under national laws that appear to be uniform to all people, they are unfair because of the different levels of understanding. The concept of a public servant Zhao Weiguo, as the chairman of the Workers' and Peasants' Party, has already shouted out, and the following is to put it into practice, no matter what, since the Workers' and Peasants' Party wants to run the country, it will inevitably set up order, and since it wants to set up order, then as the rule-setter, he is already unequal to the workers' and peasants' class in terms of understanding the rules. In Ren Di's words, Lao Tzu is busy making money and has no time to study the legal provisions, as long as he understands that the murderer dies; Hurting others and stealing crimes, and when someone hurts me, I can defend myself, and these basic legal knowledge will do.

This set of rules for managers is familiar to the setter, and the person who is busy with labor and production can never be as familiar as the setter. Then the power is in hand but not restrained, and the public servant is just hanging a name.

Zhao Weiguo quickly threw out what Ren Di had been infected with in the past 20 years - the party program and party discipline. A uniform set of rules governing all members of government. Among them, there are men and women who have a messy relationship, and they are directly expelled from public office and their party membership is revoked. This party discipline Ren Di also contributed several articles, such as the prohibition of children from going abroad, and the regulations on naked officials in China.

This is the second set of rules, set specifically for the ruling class, which has an advantage over the productive class in the operation of the law. Only the suppression of this rule can allow the ruling class, which is familiar with the legal system of law making, to offset the legal superiority of the workers and peasants. Ordinary people don't have to worry about style problems, and they don't have to worry about shuanggui. Those in power must be constrained by the second set of rules - party organization discipline.

And what is one-party governance. That is a political cluster that is constrained by a set of party organization disciplines, and it can be called a party. If you want to govern, you must abide by the ideals that you paid for with your blood and your life to defend it, because it was this class that seized power at the cost of war. If you want to govern, you must accept the organizational discipline of the ruling class. Well, as long as you can live by ideals and discipline. Well, it's no different from joining the party. It seems that the party class in Ren Di's impression is also this thing.

What is democracy, before the crossing, Ren Di thought that multi-party # ruling is democracy, and now he personally participates in the process of seizing power, and Ren Di, who has experienced the price of death, believes that the system that restricts the ruling class with the ideals and discipline of the original devotees is fair democracy.

The same ideal, unified discipline, this is one party. This party has taken over the responsibility from a class that dares to pay the price of blood to seize the leadership of change. As for other political groups, if they want to gain power, the current Ren Di can compete and ask, "Are you qualified enough, and are you qualified to trample on the ideals of the group of people who fought the world at the beginning?" Will you be able to obey the discipline that has been set in order to seize the right to change? Do you dare to give up your million-dollar economic status to obey the second set of rules and abide by the ideals of the original combatants? The world is fought by a group of people to seize the right to change, not a clown who can usurp it in a few words. Unless you can abide by the ideals of those who fight the world, and the discipline under the ideals"

Under the newly located Monument to the People's Heroes of the East China Campaign, the red flag flutters with the wind. Ren Di stood alone under this banner, seemingly in a daze, and after a long time, his right hand was raised above his head. Saluted a standard salute. He whispered: "The purpose of my arrival in this world is to obtain knowledge, purple gold and, task evaluation. I lied to you for not doing so. Well, I guess I'm a liar. I don't take pleasure in deceiving people, especially those who trust me, those who give up their lives to trust me for what I say. It's a bad feeling. Now all I can do is to keep your life from being trampled on, and that the living will not betray you and defend your wishes. ”

Ren Di put down his hand, turned his head to look at the south, and said in a flat tone: "Colleagues from seventy years ago, I'm sorry, I may conflict with the traces you left behind. No way, who told you to be a giver to this world, but I am the beneficiary of the progress of the people of this world. The direction we chose was destined to diverge. If you want to blame it, you should blame this history for not accepting your crossing with us. ”

Ps (Author: I am not a party member, if there are party members who think it is wrong, I will change it.) ）