In addition to the leaders of 20 countries, there are also researchers from various countries, developers of various advanced theories, and with the huge energy supply of nuclear fusion invented by Muren, any research and development can be developed to the maximum with the support of the state, such as synthetic bread, synthetic meat, etc. Pen? Interesting? Pavilion wWw. ｂiquge。 ｉｎfo

In this discussion, there is indeed only one issue, as Muren said: the fate of human beings.

And there are three arguments for the whereabouts of humanity:

One: Explore the universe.

Aircraft carriers built with fusion energy sources not only have a speed close to 15 percent of the speed of light, but also have an almost infinite source of energy, and it is very likely that there is a place suitable for human life in the vast universe. At least among the other five spiral arms of the Milky Way, there are countless places suitable for human life.

Two: open up the underground.

The same energy supply based on nuclear fusion, since human energy is already endless, why is it necessary to carry out space exploration full of unknown dangers? Isn't it the right way to open up the earth's underground? The space beneath the earth is absolutely more than enough for the existing human beings, as long as the energy supply of nuclear fusion can be guaranteed, then why not rely on the current technology to create a real underground human living area? After all, there are more and more monsters on the ground, and the military supplies that need air defense every day are more scary, and if there are monsters that can knock down walls, or even a monster with the same IQ as chimpanzees, then humanity will usher in a catastrophe.

Three: Resist to the death.

This argument is somewhat untenable, and only a few countries will think like this, and the vast majority will not choose it. Now that they can ensure that there is no space vortex in the safe zone, then they will build towers that eliminate space vortices all over the world, so that the whole world will not hide the towers, and at the same time, all the remaining monsters will be slaughtered, so that they will be able to take back the world where humans live?

Of the three theses, only the last one was the fastest to be rejected.

Human beings have no way to build a tower with a height of thirty meters in a place where monsters are rampant, and the construction requires the presence of professional scientists to adjust the internal structure of the tower at any time, and the construction time is at least two years, and the construction of towers in each security zone is to start researching and building when there is 0.5 seconds of darkness in the whole world, and humans can't even notice it, and the whole process takes up to ten years, and even if it is really built on land, what then? Seventy-one percent of the earth is ocean. Build a tower on top of the ocean, and the difficulty will increase exponentially!

The last one was directly vetoed, and then there were only two bickering options left. Whether to leave the earth, or to leave the earth, to open up the universe, or to curl up underground.

There is a very big advantage to opening up the underground, and that is the safety advantage.

Of all the safe zones, everyone has only one wish, to live in peace. Driven by this desire, human productivity is maximum. People can no longer sleep peacefully when they are stared at by all kinds of strange monsters in the sky, then the enthusiasm for building underground living quarters is bound to be unprecedentedly high, and human civilization can even be raised to a higher level with energy and productivity guaranteed.

It's just that the disadvantages of this are already obvious, human beings have given up the surface territory, and many people don't want human beings to live forever, so that no matter how many billions of years human beings have no future, they will always hide in a safe haven and live, what is the difference between this and being locked up by themselves? Can human society really develop under such circumstances? Human beings are inert, if a few years human beings can still be prepared for danger in peacetime, but what about decades? How many hundred years? Or even thousands of years? At that time, would humans still think about living underground? Is there a horrible bunch of creatures above this head?

There is also a reason why this objection was raised by a biologist in country M, which is evolutionary slavery.

In the long history of evolution, Lamakti's theory of evolution, and then Darwin laid the scientific foundation for the theory of evolution has always occupied the mainstream view, but some biologists strongly disagree, in Darwin's theory of evolution from apes has a very strange elaboration. Organisms are mutated and inherited to adapt to the changing weather, for example, animals will have thick hair and fat in cold winters, and there are unique ways to cool down in hot places, but humans do not. Human beings are a homeothermic animal, an animal that freezes to death when it is cold and dies of heat when it is hot, how can it adapt to the environment? More people feel that there has been a sudden change in human evolution, similar to the Big Bang of technology, there has been a sudden leap forward.

So what about the monsters that humans can be like this? What if they had intelligence, developed a new civilization, and then discovered a human civilization underground? The collision of two civilizations of different species must lead to war, which can be seen from any war of human beings, and now they have been able to force people to the end of the road, and the reproduction after that is really unimaginable, and human beings may really go extinct.

Flying into space has an advantage, that is, human beings will always maintain a knowledge-seeking mentality and a driving force, and at the same time, human beings can actually develop underground, but slowly, all for the sake of the outside planet, to be able to find a planet suitable for human beings to live, and after finding it, human beings can take the existing civilization to develop again in a new place, and even technology can usher in an explosion again, without the trouble of monsters, human beings are still the strongest.

It's just that this argument is more controversial than only developing underground, although there are countless people looking for something similar to the earth, but no one can really guarantee the existence of those who can live it, and if so, how far away? Hundreds of light years? Thousands of light years? Will human civilization survive to that time? Perhaps when the exploration team returns, the earth is already full of giant beasts, and it is uninhabited.

In the end, there are only two points of view left constantly colliding, Zhang Yi Muren's point of view will of course be used as an important reference object, but Zhang Yi and Muren's views are different from the leaders, Zhang Yi Muren hopes to go to the universe, and the leader chooses the underground, and human life underground is the highest priority.