readx;

read336;

Professor Yu told us that, in fact, the security department had already reached a conclusion about Pengamu's case, but it was only because it involved some secrets and did not announce it to the public. Pen × fun × Pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 ｉｎｆｏ

After saying these words, he opened the drawer of his desk, took out an old notebook from it, handed it to me, and said: "This is the personal note of an old forensic doctor in the Pengamu case, and I don't know how Ah Sheng got it in his hand. ”

I opened my notebook and read it carefully, the old forensic doctor's diary was very convincing, in addition to all kinds of direct evidence, there were important facts of the case that had never been made public.

The note begins with this read:

The second dried corpse......

I'm a forensic doctor, and everyone calls me Lao Zhang.

Many cases have secrets that cannot be said, as a forensic doctor, I have seen too many things like that, and I really have a disturbing conscience, I do not have the courage and ability to publish the truth, so I have to write these words, hoping that one day those unsolved cases can be revealed to the world.

I'm going to talk about the Lop Nur case, there are too many weird rumors in this case, but none of them are close to the truth.

April 16, 2006, a day I will never forget, remember when I received a call from the relevant authorities, and I was taken aback and thought that a sensational news was about to appear.

So what exactly is the news? Why would I describe it that way?

Let's put it this way, on April 11, 2005, a desert expedition team in Qili Town, Dunhuang City, found two dried corpses in the northwest of the Kumtag Desert, and according to the preliminary identification of researchers, they suspected that one of the corpses was a mysterious missing scientist, but due to technical reasons, they were unable to complete DNA identification at that time.

Later, the two dried corpses were transported to the Dunhuang Museum in Gansu Province, but they claimed that only one dried corpse was found.

Why do you say that? Actually, this has nothing to do with conspiracy theories, our country is still trustworthy. It's just that when the dried corpse was found, someone spread the news, and people began to speculate whether it would be the scientist Pengamu, who disappeared many years ago.

But you know, he has something to do with some science and technology, because it involves secrecy and many uncertain factors, the second dried corpse naturally became a secret, and people thought that only one dried corpse was found.

On 16 April 2006, I received a phone call explaining what had happened to me and asking me to go to Dunhuang with another forensic doctor from Beijing. I am well aware of the importance of this task, and everyone is concerned about the identity of the dried corpse.

Soon, we rushed to the Dunhuang Museum, took hair, bones and skin from the dried corpses and brought them back to the laboratory in Beijing, ready to analyze the samples. After the analysis was completed, we were able to find Pengamu's relatives through the organization and hope that they would provide DNA samples, but the process did not go well.

Pengamu's children were initially uncooperative, believing that the corpse was not their father, and that they were not being respected by the authorities for concealing the second corpse. After some persuasion, Pengamu's sons and daughters were willing to provide DNA samples for forensic comparison.

Because Pengamu disappeared at that time, it was rumored that he had taken a very precious scientific expedition diary and defected to another country, but his children did not think so, and now that there was an opportunity to correct their father's name, they decided to cooperate with the forensic medical examination.

So, the question is, whether the second dried corpse was Peng Jiamu doing DNA comparison, I and other forensic doctors were also very nervous, many leaders called to inquire about the results, and some even personally came to supervise the identification work.

At that moment, I had an inexplicable premonition that the fog had not been completely revealed, and that behind the dried corpse, there was a greater mystery involved.

After careful identification, we finally concluded that the dried corpse was indeed Pengamu. After this result came out, no one breathed a sigh of relief, but everyone became more curious and nervous, including me, everyone wanted to know why Pengamu disappeared and what was the cause of his death?

To be honest, in the process of identification, I studied the case of Pengamu's disappearance, and I ruled out surreal conjectures and thought only from the perspective of forensic science, and there were many illogical doubts in this case. But to find the answer, to hear the "last words" left by the corpse twenty-six years later, we also need to understand the specific circumstances of the day of Pengamu's disappearance.

In this way, the truth is getting closer and closer to me, but no one has guessed the right answer.

Pengamu disappeared in Lop Nur before his body was found 25 years later. In the past 25 years, everyone is most concerned about Pengamu's fate and cause of death, and since the body has been identified, the cause of death has become everyone's greatest concern.

Regarding the cause of Pengamu's death, the outside world has long been polarized, one is that Pengamu's cause of death involves supernatural phenomena, such as a jade pendant that can be copied by itself, or encountering aliens or something like that, and the other is that Pengamu went out alone to find water, got lost and died of thirst.

In fact, as early as the identification of the cadre, I already had an eyebrow, and Pengamu could not have died of lack of water, or starved to death.

This means that the rationalist view is wrong, and the cause of Pengamu's death is not so simple.

The people who do forensics are rationalists, and if we reject the rationalist view, do we want to support the supernatural? Of course not, the case is much more complicated than we thought.

I can tell that Pengamu did not die of natural causes because of the wax on the dried corpses, which is very rare, which is the most bizarre.

In forensic science, all nutrients other than oxygen are not replenished, which is called complete starvation, and the resulting death is called starvation.

In cases of death by starvation, the most typical features are dry skin, a decrease in blood, a decrease in the volume of internal organs, and the disappearance of fat. It would be doubtful if someone claimed that an old man was starved to death, but had a lot of fat.

Then, if Pengamu really went out in search of water, and lost his way without water and food, he would eventually go completely hungry, and in the extremely dry area of Lop Nur, his fat would definitely disappear completely, especially if the dried corpse had been in the desert for twenty-five years.

That is to say, if there is no fat in the corpse, there is no corpse wax. If Pengamu's cause of death was starvation, then his fat would have disappeared completely, and even if there was some fat, it would not have been possible to form corpse wax in the extremely dry environment of Lop Nur. Based on the discovery of the corpse wax, I suspect that Pengamu did not die of natural causes, and what happened to him in Lop Nur is still a mystery, not at all as the outside world speculated.

In the process of the formation of dried corpses, certain personal characteristics and traces of violent effects (such as injuries and hooks) can be effectively retained, so they have certain forensic significance.

I examined the dried corpse, and it had obvious signs of violence, which is why I determined that Pengamu had died of unnatural causes, not starvation, or accident.

What struck me was that the traces of violence were so shocking that they were rare in my years of forensic career.

What happened to Pengamu in Lop Nur, and what kind of shocking traces of violence were on the corpse? Who committed the sin? And most importantly, what was the motive for the killing?

Basically, the forensic doctor only does the autopsy, and it doesn't matter much to us who the murderer is and how to solve the case.

However, this case is very special and can never be openly investigated by law enforcement, so I have access to more clues and the details of Pengamu's disappearance in Lop Nur

After leaving a note saying, "I'll go east to find a well," Pengamu walked alone into the desert and never returned to the camp.

Not long after Pengamu's disappearance, the expedition team members drove an off-road vehicle to the east to find someone, and after driving more than a kilometer, they found a line of footprints, and believed that they were Pengamu's footprints. Therefore, the scientific expedition team members continued to search along the footprints, and on the sandbag about six kilometers away, Pengamu's footprints were still clearly visible, but no one could be found.

At two o'clock in the evening, the expedition team still could not find Peng Jiamu, so they had to report the news of his disappearance to the garrison by telegram, and asked the garrison to immediately convey it to the Xinjiang Branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Here, I would like to state that the cadaver had three blunt wounds to the head, eleven sharp wounds to the limbs, and twenty-seven sharp wounds to the chest, abdomen, and back. If it weren't for the fact that the person was dead and the corpse had become a dried corpse, then the murder scene must have been extremely bloody and terrifying.

Another piece of evidence is that the note left by Peng Jiamu has a significant change in time, which was changed from June 16 to June 17.

The diary is basically written here, and there is a paragraph at the end, but it is some analysis written by Ah Sheng:

"Pengamu's message may be fake, the scientific expedition diary disappeared at the same time as him, where is he going? Who chased him and killed him? ”