In the Cincinnati National Zoo, a four-year-old boy accidentally fell into a gorilla pond, was roughly dragged by a male chimpanzee, and detained for ten minutes, the Cincinnati Zoo made a decisive decision to kill the gorilla and the boy was rescued.

I know that comments about the incident have caused an uproar in the United States, with animal rights activists and those prioritizing the lives of boys at loggerheads.

Kousheng's personal opinion is to respect the Cincinnati Zoo's decision. Even though I'm an animal rights activist, I have to admit that after watching the full video of the boy trapped in the orangutan pond at the time, the four-year-old boy's life was indeed very fragile and in danger at the hands of the gorillas.

Of course, if we hadn't imprisoned the wild orangutans that should have lived freely in a pristine environment in the first place, the boy wouldn't have been in this danger.

Therefore, how can we clearly explain which is right and which is wrong? Mankind's arbitrariness and reckless behavior not only often cause crises in the same kind, but those who ultimately pay the price for mankind's hegemony have always resided

"Inferior" animals. Think about it a little more, humans vs. animals

The "level of superiority and inferiority" is not exactly what is common in human society

Is there a "difference in status"?

"Xuankun Strange History" is one hundred and thirty-six days in the hand, please wait a moment,

Once the content is updated, please refresh the page again to get the latest updates!