The strange behavior of the middle-aged forensic personnel made everyone present stunned at the same time. Needless to say, one of the fingerprints must be Yoko Okino, otherwise the middle-aged connoisseurs would not look at Yoko Okino first, and the other fingerprint may have been left by someone who came to Yoko Okino's house, or it may have been left by someone who sold kitchen knives, or it may have been left by someone who wanted to buy this knife, but in the end it was left by someone who didn't buy this one. When cleaning knives, people generally only clean the blade, few people will deliberately clean the handle, maybe in some places with higher requirements for hygienic conditions will be specially cleaned the handle, but at home this kind of non-solemn occasion will definitely not, unless the person has a habit of cleanliness. Since no one bothered to clean the hilt of a knife, there is a very high probability that the fingerprint will be successfully preserved if someone else has left a fingerprint on the hilt and the knife has not been used much since then, and the fingerprint is recent. What everyone wonders about is not why there are two fingerprints on the knife, but the strange behavior of the middle-aged forensic personnel, and the middle-aged forensic personnel just look at Yoko Okino, which means that one of the fingerprints is Yoko Okino, but what does he mean when he looks at Yuko Ikezawa?

The behavior of the middle-aged forensic personnel looking at Yuko Ikezawa with strange eyes represents two possibilities, either this forensic person is a super pervert (wolf), the kind of super pervert (wolf) who can't walk when he sees a beautiful woman, or another fingerprint on the kitchen knife is Yuko Ikezawa. The first possibility is not nonsense, if this middle-aged connoisseur is really a pervert (wolf), he should be looking at Tifa. And not Yuko Ikezawa. So there is only the second possibility. The kitchen knife also has Yuko Ikezawa's fingerprints on it. If that's the case, the murder is a bit complicated, either Yoko Okino killed Fujie, and then Yuko Ikezawa made up for it, or Yuko Ikezawa got it, and then Yoko Okino made up for it, or one of them got it and made up another knife in an attempt to blame the other. Either one of them succeeded with another person's knife, and the other person found out and made up a knife to clear the suspicion, or it is possible that the two conspired to kill Fujie, and then acted together in the current scene. Although there are only these seven most likely situations, which don't seem to be much, the disputes involved in emotional and other aspects are enough to make a detective of Holmes's level cry directly. What everyone didn't know was that the situation was far from being as simple as it seemed, and if you considered the special situation that one of the knives was pierced by Fujie himself, there would be many more possibilities, not to mention. This situation can also be subdivided into whether Fujie was injured first and then committed suicide. Or commit suicide first, and then be mended for these two categories. In addition to these more probable cases, there are other possibilities, that is, Fujie was not killed by one of Yoko Okino and Yuko Ikezawa, nor did he commit suicide, and the real murderer is someone else, if this is really the case, there is no way to solve this case, and its complexity is enough to make it a headless public case.

"One of the two knives must have been stabbed after the deceased had died, right? If my reasoning is correct, the knife didn't stab deep and didn't hit the point. While everyone was analyzing the meaning of the actions of the middle-aged forensics, Conan and Mori glanced at each other, and finally Mori asked. Maori and Conan were patronizing and analyzing the case, but they didn't notice the change in Tifa's expression at this time, and Tifa's face was now full of confusion, because she suddenly found her flaw. When the layout was carried out, Fujie was already dead before Tifa rushed to Yoko Okino's house, that is to say, Tifa stabbed the kitchen knife of Yuko Ikezawa's house into Fujie's body, trying to blame Yuko Ikezawa, and making the case more complicated The act is purely a snake painting, as long as the forensic personnel are not stupid, they can analyze that the later knife was pierced after the death of the deceased, which makes Tifa's behavior of blaming Yuko Ikezawa useless. Of course, Tifa's behavior is not completely meaningless, if it is in normal times, everyone is very calm, everyone can naturally see the problem from this matter, knowing that Ikezawa Yuko is to blame, so as to simplify the case, but in this situation, everyone has no way to think calmly and carefully, Tifa's redundant behavior not only does not make the case simple, but makes everyone suspicious, which is equivalent to increasing the difficulty in disguise, so Tifa only struggled for a short while, When I figured it out, my face immediately changed to a weird smile.

In Maori's view, Yoko Okino and Yuko Ikezawa can't be prisoners, but if you have to find a prisoner among the two, it can only be Yuko Ikezawa, after all, the innocent and lovely Miss Yoko doesn't look like a prisoner no matter how you look at it. If a person wants to kill another person, a knife is enough, after all, everyone only has one dominant hand, and it will be very awkward to hold a knife in a non-dominant hand, and if you are not careful, you will hurt yourself. No one will use two knives when killing another person, let alone stab both knives into the body of the deceased, if you want to increase the lethality, the normal behavior should be to stab, pull out, and stab again, not two knives at the same time. Since only one knife was used to kill the deceased, it is not possible for the other knife to be pierced by the prisoner on the spot, but only by someone later for some reason, either later by the prisoner himself or later by someone else. In the former possibility, the prisoner later stabbed the deceased again with a knife in order to confuse the public, to conceal a certain truth, or to frame someone else. In the second case, another person other than the prisoner later stabbed a knife into the deceased's body again, and the purpose could only be to blame, but there will be one more thing to consider here, that is, why did the person later blame, was it just to blame, or at the same time, to get himself out?

If the second knife is stabbed by the prisoner after the fact, the possibility of framing others is higher, because if it is to conceal a certain truth, the best thing to do is to pull out the original knife, and then completely destroy the wound left, so that the police have no way to find the prisoner according to the murder weapon and wounds, of course, it would be better if the murder weapon or even the corpse could be destroyed, so that the police would be completely blind, but the prisoner did not take this safer method, then it means, The prisoner later stabbed a knife again, not to conceal some unsightly truth, but to frame someone. (To be continued......)