I have read your comments carefully. I also seriously revisited the previous chapter.

The first thing I want to make sure is that there is nothing wrong with the formulation. As far as it is concerned, it is not a popular science book, and I have already explained enough in the previous chapter to ensure that it is literary. If you don't understand, please come and go through it with me.

Since you need a simpler answer, let's put it in a formula.

Jiang Shuo - a Qin Yiheng - b True Dragon - C letter indicates *.

And the content in between represents the soul.

In the order of the timeline, the story goes like this.

Originally, a(a) = Jiang Shuo's body + Jiang Shuo's soul.

Jiang Shuo was hit.

So it became a(c) = Jiang Shuo's body + the soul of the true dragon.

Then Qin Yiheng came to the rescue.

became a(b) = Jiang Shuo's body + Qin Yiheng's soul.

All the "I" mentioned in the text refers to the soul.

So in the future, Jiang Shuo has always appeared in the form of b(a). It's not a brain-burning problem.

Because the soul is the key to distinguishing a person.

From the first chapter of the book, the character of Jiang Shuo is B(A). It has been like this until now.

Therefore, no matter what anyone calls Jiang Shuo or Qin Yiheng, they are mainly soul-based, and when the soul is not sure that it is this person, they will distinguish it by their physical body.

I see that some readers in the comments gave an example, when Qin Yiheng sighed that he saved Jiang Shuo, he said that it was so good that my good friend Jiang Shuo did not die.

There is nothing wrong with this sentence, whether Jiang Shuo's body is a pig or Ultraman or anything.

x Anything (a)

As long as the parentheses are A, that is, Jiang Shuo's soul. Isn't that supposed to be a sigh that Jiang Shuo is not dead?

－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－

After the ornate dividing line, I would like to talk about another issue.

There are plenty of pitfalls in this story. I also accept your complaints, Momoda.

But the thing that bothers me a lot is that there are some holes that I have clearly filled, but I will see many readers and friends who do not feel it.

As a part, especially in the first person.

According to the creative technique, it is impossible to have a God's perspective, listing the unsolved things one by one and revealing the secrets.

Although I often use large sections of self-narrated dialogue in order to take care of everyone's emotions when filling in the pits, this is actually not beautiful. But don't write it like this, I'm afraid more people won't understand it, (in fact, even if it's written like this, there are still many people who can't understand it...) The main problem should be that my own skills are not deep enough, so I hope you will forgive me.

Secondly, many people will be entangled in various ways. For example, when Jiang Shuo said this later, why is it not the same as what XX said before.

This problem is in addition to some of the bugs (readers who have bought the Taiwan version of the physical book can compare it, in fact, I have dealt with these bugs, and I am sorry for the readers in the mainland, it's not that I don't want to go out of the mainland version, but I really can't pass the review.) Bow).

Except for bugs, most of you are not right. Actually, the reason is very simple.

It's a first-person film.

I can illustrate with an example. It's like a fruit, you and your friends have eaten this fruit, but the evaluation and preference for the fruit are always different.

You might say that the fruit is delicious. But your friends will say that the fruit doesn't taste good.

Both of you are right, because your comments are based on your own subjective thoughts. In the same way, the characters in the story will have their own understanding of one thing, a puzzle, a mystery, a past, and a memory.

Also for example, is Qin Yiheng a bad guy? Dispose of the dirty stuff everywhere. Isn't this for the benefit of humanity!

But from the perspective of ghosts, is Qin Yiheng a bad person? Damn, yes! Lao Tzu is a good ghost here, and you brought someone to rush in and scatter Lao Tzu's soul. Isn't this a bad guy?

So, the greatest pleasure of the first person, in my opinion, is the limitation of the perspective.

What each character sees is not necessarily comprehensive, and everyone has their own place to understand and accept.

When these people understand and accept things come together, it certainly sounds strange to you.

How can the same fruit be delicious and not taste good, and it is too sweet and not delicious?

But these are indeed the same fruits that all kinds of people understand.

－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－

Now that we've talked about the first-person perspective. I'll talk about it after the dividing line.

All the stories in the text are elaborated from Jiang Shuo's first-person perspective.

This perspective will bring a lot of cool points, such as the corner of the room is obviously not a ghost, but the "I" in the text thinks it is a ghost, very scared, to explore, very cool.

But it will also bring a lot of unpleasant points, the same corner of the room is obviously not a ghost, the "I" in the text went to explore, I was scared, and I found that it was not a ghost. But there's no way to explain what it is, because "I" don't know!

Jiang Shuo is not an omniscient God, he is only responsible for witnessing everything, collecting everything he knows, analyzing it, and drawing conclusions.

It's as simple as that.

According to the personality of a character, it is impossible for him to have so much energy and ability to distinguish everything he sees and hears. This is a trait that a normal person should have. You can't say that after Jiang Shuo heard that Markham Rong would sink him into the Yin River, his first reaction was to think, whether Qin Yiheng was involved in this matter or not? How deep is the Yin River? None of this is logical.

As a normal person, when I heard that I was going to sink into the Yin River, I must have a thought!

Why do I want to sink into the Yin River!

It's as simple as that.

Even, when a person is in danger. For example, earthquakes, landslides.

His instinct was not to run and be afraid. Instead, stand there and think about why the mountain landslides? Is it because the afforestation is not perfect? Is it because there has been too little precipitation here in recent years? How is this possible?

In fact, do you care about these issues after you've been through all this?

You only care, what should I do if I don't bring out my belongings? Will anyone settle my life, and when will the relief materials be delivered to me? That's a normal person.

So when Jiang Shuo saw the mystery and had to force himself to solve it, he had already grown and become strong in the process of going all the way. But even if he is strong and growing, he can't detach himself from a person's basic personality.

Because he is a human first, and Jiang Shuo second. It's as simple as that.

－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－

The previous paragraph unconsciously talked a bit a lot, and it is estimated that most people may not understand it.

Then this paragraph will be more practical.

Pit.

Will the pit be filled? Of course, I've been filling in the holes since the fifth book.

I don't shy away from filling the pits.

Some people say that I must not be perfect, I can't pat my chest and say, I can fill in until everyone is satisfied.

Because many things in this story should not be known and understood by Jiang Shuo as the protagonist.

For example, you go back and ask me, how did the Yin River form?

I wanted to tell you, but I couldn't say it with Jiang Shuo's mouth. Because he is Jiang Shuo, the first-person narrator of the whole book, he doesn't know how the Yin River was formed, and it is impossible to write it.

Unless the book is from a third-person perspective, I can narrate everything from God's point of view. Otherwise, these forcibly inserted pits are not fillers, but textbooks. Is that really interesting?

And, my readers.

Can you be as rational as possible when you think about certain things?

Everything mentioned in the text is nothing more than what Jiang Shuo saw, what Jiang Shuo heard, what Jiang Shuo knew, and what Jiang Shuo guessed.

And Jiang Shuo saw the, he didn't eat it, but he thought it was, okay.

Even if Jiang Shuo really went to eat, he was still standing on his own subjective analysis that this thing was, because there was no authoritative determination that could issue a certificate.

In the same way, what Qin Yiheng saw was the same, and Markham Rong saw the same. Bai Kai or the real dragon saw the same.

Everyone has a subjective analysis and what they think is a valid reason and reason.

But who is the authority?

No one is authoritative, and there is no such thing as an authority.

It's impossible for me to add a paragraph of os in the process of writing, here has been the answer approved by the official author, here is the personal profile of the character Jiang Shuo, and has nothing to do with this author. And so on and so forth.

That wouldn't be the case.

－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－

Finally, let's talk about the book "Murder House".

No more, no less three years, fast or slow.

Nearly 800,000 words. On average, he writes more than 200,000 words a year. As a writer, I don't think it's slow.

As a common kind of online writer, it's a slow explosion.

As the saying goes, the benevolent see the benevolent, and the wise see the wise.

Sometimes I want to be fast, but I don't feel like I'm in that position, I don't have enough time, and my mood is not calm enough, so it's hard to write. It's not that I'm willful, it's that I have some requirements for myself.

The murderous house was born in 12 years, and everyone will think that it is an epoch-making bestseller.

But I didn't think that because of various publication review problems, the murderous house did not achieve the expected results. But I'm pretty comfortable with it, it's good that someone likes stories.

I still feel honored and lucky.

Frankly speaking, I don't earn as much as I make writing a short story here for a month than I can just write a short story and throw it anywhere.

It was completed purely to give an account to those who watched this work at the time.

So my plot stretch was not kidnapped by the publisher, and I was not forced to compromise by censorship. The original is here. Whether you like it or not, I really tried my best.

Originally, I just wanted a few words, but I didn't think that there were a lot of words in one mouth.

Then I'll talk about some other questions.

Many people ask why there is a bold font in the physical book version where Jiang Shuo tells stories to others.

How does that relate to the story?

I actually answered it a long time ago, but there is no connection at all.

At the beginning, the publication of the first part of the murderous house was stuck for 8 months, and then in order to avoid censorship, a box had to be added outside. That is, to tell the censor that all the content in the story is just a story told by others, please don't check me, big brother. Such.

Therefore, there will never be a bold story in the online version, because the murderous house itself has no connection.

The second problem is that those who haven't read the physical book can skip it.

In the first part of the physical book, more and more people are listening to the story, and only two people are left on the sofa.

But after turning a few pages, the two people on the sofa turned into three people fighting.

A lot of people will think that this is a foreshadowing for me.

Actually, I also answered this, not at all!

I wouldn't use such a lo method. The fundamental reason is that before the publication of the first book, when the editor proofreads, he privately changed two people to three people (the editor estimated that the math was worse than mine). I checked all the bugs and stuff before I submitted the paper, and I had nothing to do with this huge bug.

But what if there's already a bug? I had no choice but to write along the bug.

So the story of the simple frame of the physical book in bold font has become more and more complicated because of this bug, and I am anxious.

The third question, the murderous house wrote, do you fill in the pit of the seed world, the wish teacher, and the juvenile chapter.

The answer is yes, and I will definitely fill it in. But don't expect me to write anytime soon.

I can't publish it because I wrote it, so I can only use it as a reward for you and your love for your work. It's not that I'm too practical, in fact, most of the readers who urged me to update on Weibo watched pirated copies, and I am equally grateful. But as a writer, I want to see my work occupy a higher stage, instead of just surviving in the cracks of the Internet forever, nothing more.

Now IP is valuable. In fact, even if the murderous house is not popular now, it is still valuable.

But one of them is certainly not understood by the original reader, and I can only say that everything is not as simple as it seems to you. I also have a hard time.

－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－

The final dividing line.

All the chapters of the murderous house in the grinding iron, except for the first two parts, are my unmodified online versions.

In fact, everything should be based on the physical version of the book.

But since you can't buy physical books, I should bear the burden of this problem.

So when it's over, I'm going to put out the physical version of the book as appropriate according to the situation at the time.

I hope to give you a satisfactory answer.

As for some readers, I think that there may be some reversals that are too godly twists.

All I can say is that I will do my best to make God turn less divine.

But what I hope to understand is, to use an analogy. The protagonist was walking on the road and suddenly there was an earthquake. Is this a turning point?

Some people may think that it counts, because there should be signs before the earthquake, chickens and dogs jump, fish jump out of the water, and there are earthquake clouds in the sky.

But as an ordinary person, can you see these signs?

Will you notice it even if you see it?

Even if you notice it, will you believe that it is a sign of an earthquake?

These are question marks.

The real turning point was just the earthquake.

Because this is what an ordinary person sees.

So the answer to whether God is God or not is still a question mark.

That's all.

This is true for ordinary people who see earthquakes.

The same is true for Jiang Shuo, who has seen other things.

Thank you all for your companionship along the way. In the future, I will write something that can be published and look good.