I don't know why, my account keeps failing to reply and can't even vote for recommendations.

So, in recent times, I haven't replied to a single post.

But today I saw a few posts, and it was really like a stalk in the throat, and I didn't vomit unpleasantly.

I know that when a book is written by an author, thousands of readers will have thousands of opinions, and the author should not force readers to influence readers with his own opinions. But sometimes, there is some understanding, and it really surprises me.

For example, what happened to Han, in the novel, Professor Zhuang said that Han himself is responsible, and I also think that Han himself is responsible.

But Han should be responsible for his own tragic fate, it does not mean that he must be responsible for the lives of others.

I've seen some readers say, Di Jing has become like this, Ah Han is responsible, Ah Han has made mistakes, if Ah Han is willing to respond to Di Jing, things will not turn out like this?

I'm surprised why Han should respond and what reason Han has to respond.

If you change any person, the person who is saved by yourself will take revenge, absorb all the internal force, poison into mute, lock in a prison, and rape every day, and this person actually has to respond to the person who treats him like this. So this person, does he still have a trace of self-esteem, self-love and self-respect?

What I want to write is never a story of love because of SM and love out of abuse, just as I can never understand the kind of person who loves the abuser after being abused.

Han's indifferent resistance is just a means and a way to protect himself. On the contrary, it is not like this to treat Di Fei, Han. Han is not completely indifferent and ruthless, and when he is with Di Fei, although he does not understand the taste of love, he can also talk and laugh, which will make life a little interesting.

In the fourth life, although he was lazy, he also fulfilled his responsibilities and obligations as a son of man with his biological mother.

When Di Jing first became friends with him, although he was lazy, he still let Di Jing into his life with a conniving attitude. When Di Jing laughed, he listened quietly, and for the lazy Han, it was already an expression of friendship.

If he responds to such a Di Jing, then he is not the protagonist of my pen, but the person I despise the most.

Could it be that Zhang San likes Li Si, so he tied him up, abolished him, and locked him up,

Li Si didn't like Zhang San, Zhang San became more and more crazy,

As a result, in the end, Li Si was responsible for Zhang San's madness, all because Li Si didn't love Zhang San and didn't react to his love, so all the responsibility was on Li Si?

So, does a person who is born without love, or who is insensitive to feelings, deserve to be hurt?

If you don't know how to love and can't love, is that the reason for being abused?

What should Han do so that he is not responsible?

If he refuses Di Jing, Di Jing will be even crazier, and he will be more crazy if he is righteous and stern, and he will accuse Di Jing, and Di Jing will be even crazier.

Everyone wouldn't expect Di Jing to find out with his conscience, and let Han go because he didn't love him.

So, Han's only choice is to love Di Jing and respond to Di Jing, so that Di Jing may not be crazy?

Does he have an obligation to fall in love with Di Jing?

Does the kidnapped person have an obligation to fall in love with the kidnapper?

What if Han fell in love with Di Jing? Would Di Jing not want to be a sect leader whose real power overwhelmed the kings? Would Di Jing not want to suppress all factions in the world and unify martial arts as the hegemon? Will he be satisfied with the love of a beautiful teenager? If this is the case, why did you bother to design to harm Han in the first place?

Take 10,000 steps back and say, even if Di Jing really becomes the infatuated male protagonist of romance novels or Tanmei novels, for the sake of his lover, he doesn't want the world, he doesn't want ideals, and he only wants his lover to be good?

However, does Han have the obligation to fall in love with Di Jing, and does he have the obligation to fall in love with Di Jing for the sake of world peace, martial arts stability, and everyone's happiness.

If he has such an obligation, he has to be responsible for so much justice, then when Fu Hanqing in the male pet chapter was dedicated to another country for the sake of one country, why did so many readers denounce the monarchs and ministers of Liang Guo?

Some readers said that Di Jing is so pitiful, he is just a child who longs for love but can't get it, if Ahhanken loves him? Di Jing did all this just to get Han's love.

We don't care whether all sins done in the name of love deserve to be forgiven.

I hope readers can remember that when Di Jing first dealt with Han, he did not fall in love with Han, he clearly knew that Han was his savior, however, for fear that his power would be shaken, he mercilessly deceived Han to save him, lost his internal strength, and then set out to kill Han.

When he does such an intolerable thing, it is not for love.

And after seeing Han's beautiful appearance, he mercilessly killed his brother who was dedicated to helping him.

Of course, we can call it for love, a domineering attack for a stunning little suffer, kill a supporting passer-by, a brother who doesn't know each other, what is this.

Is this a natural expression of love? Who cares how ruthless, how vicious, how mad, how treacherous.

Di Jing's growth environment is not good, Di Jing longs for love, so all the innocents that Di Jing killed are no longer important, the important thing is that he loves Han, he becomes like this, and Han has an unshirkable responsibility.

I don't think there is any need for Tanmei to carry the Tao, but I still can't understand why, after seeing too many Tanmei stories, we have lost the most basic judgment of immorality.

When we see a person imprisoning, raping, humiliating, and hurting another person, we don't think about how cruel and unkind it is, but we often think about how much he loves that little sufferer, although he did it cruelly, but this madness is also for love, in fact, it is also very pitiful.

When we see him killing, madness, injury, burning, killing and plundering, because those who died are cannon fodder, they are all things that can't even be talked about by passers-by, so we can't see the cruelty and horror of these acts, but just think that they have become like this for the sake of loving him, which is really pitiful and lamentable.

What kind of psychological trauma Di Jing had, what kind of incomplete childhood he had, we will not discuss it for the time being.

What I want to ask is whether when a person has an unhappy past, is that misfortune a reason for him to hurt others.

Does a man have the right to hold up his misfortune as a signboard, and then kill in a grand manner, destroy with impunity, and then be blamed?

To give another simple example, is it because Zhang San lacks fatherly love, so it is reasonable for him to kill someone else's father, because Li Si's family is very poor, so if he robs and kills, he will not break the law and can be forgiven.

Yes, Di Jing's love for Han is crazy.

Perverted fans are also crazy about their love for stars, and celebrities don't respond to the demands of such fans, so, as a fan, kidnap the stars they love, and even shoot their favorite stars.

We have seen such stories on TV, in novels, and even in real biographies.

We will say that the star is also responsible for this matter, if he is willing to respond to this fan, maybe the matter will not come to this point?

We will say, the fan is so pitiful, does he just want to love but can't?

I have never been able to understand whether it is because we have lost the most basic understanding of moral right and wrong, so there are countless love stories after such unscrupulous abuse and injury, or because there are too many such love stories, which make us gradually blur, the most basic judgment of right and wrong.

The above words are very impulsive, very chaotic, no logic, no normal thinking, purely when I read the reply post tonight, I suddenly surged impulsively.

In addition, Tiantian Angel asked, why did it be said that the plot of these two chapters was different from the previous plot, the reason is very simple, Professor Zhuang thinks that Han's mental power is out of control and needs to be kept secret, so it is said that Ah Han himself applied for the closure of the file, and all the relevant details are also because of this big lie, and there are other appropriate modifications, a big lie always needs several small lies to cooperate. Moreover, a successful lie must be false and true, so although the small details are false, the matter of Han's application to change the topic is true.

As for the words that some readers say about Han's self-inflicted experience, in fact, I personally agree that Han's own responsibility for everything he has experienced. But he should not be held fully responsible.

Blaming everything on the evil of human nature should not be, but it also cannot make Han alone responsible for all the evils of human nature.

For example, watching TV series, a certain character has a weak temperament, so others often bully him and insult him, although we look down on people with weak temperaments and think that he should be responsible for his own misfortune, but is it not wrong for the person who oppresses and humiliates because of the weakness of others, is it not worth reflecting on and facing this evil in human nature?

Second Sister You's weakness caused her to commit suicide, but if it weren't for Sister Feng's step-by-step force, she wouldn't ruin her life. While we reproach her for weakness, should we also see that there is another evil that should be criticized more?

Ahan is dull, naïve, and even childish. He doesn't know how to protect himself, because he doesn't understand human nature, he doesn't understand, people can be ugly, they can be cruel, they can be ruthless.

Han is not good at responding to others, Han doesn't care about everything, I myself said in the article, from a certain point of view, Han is an extremely indifferent person, and it can also be said that Xiaolou is the most ruthless person.

However, his ruthlessness and indifference do not mean that he deserves to be abused.

Just like in our real life, someone is the kind of self-righteous man, who doesn't like to ask for help, doesn't accept other people's requests, doesn't make friends, doesn't like to socialize, this kind of person, I can say that he is withdrawn and eccentric, but we can't say that he deserves to be hurt, humiliated, and oppressed.

Finally, two more things come to mind,

First, the reader suggested that I open an advertising post, and delete the advertisement other than the advertising post in the future.

I think the pushes are over, and the ads should be reduced. Of course, if there are still a lot of advertisements that affect everyone to read book reviews, I will take this suggestion.

Second, today I saw a reader who said very righteously, your click is fake, do you want to deceive readers, do you think readers are stupid?

Laughing Mimi, I've heard for a long time that there are fake clicks, fake recommended methods, that is, I don't know the bottom line, if this master is willing to advise, quite willing to learn from a teacher, if he has the opportunity to rush to the list or something, I can really use a few tricks, and let more readers, have the opportunity, and can honestly accuse me of fake.

Finally, in the end, well, I still can't figure out what's going on with my computer, why I just can't reply to the post, I can't send recommendations. In the future, if there is still such gossip to be said, or some relevant posts from readers to reply, it may be updated in this chapter.

Finally, finally, to emphasize one point, Han committed suicide, not to be eaten, or Di Jing wanted to eat him, but he didn't have time to achieve it, Khan.