"Lu-Ramnick" is Ye Wei's prank?!

The media and the public were in a mess about this, and the two Facebook of Ye Wei and "Ramnik" were noisy and burst into laughter, surprise and scolding.

Naturally, the Mi Mi were relieved that it was just a false alarm, and some people enjoyed the fun in it, and looked at the Wei Hei who were scolding as if they had broken their front teeth with a punch! Some people are also dissatisfied, but brother, what are you doing? You have been tricked by everyone, and is this really good?

Compared with the embarrassment, the blacks continued to attack in a trance, ridiculing this kind of behavior as boring and childish, Ye Wei is really an idiot!

Some online media people also reprimanded Ye Wei for being almost equivalent to spreading rumors, today is not April Fool's Day, he is doing this to cut off his justice and push himself to the opposite. Therefore, some black media are ugly, but it also makes the part of the media that helps him feel anxious, don't make others unable to help if they want to.

All parties knew that Ye Wei would definitely come up with an explanation. didn't wait long, a few hours after the prank was revealed, in the early hours of the morning, Ye Wei's social networking site was updated:

[Wow! What's going on with the "Lu-Ramnik incident" today? It's very simple, as you can see.

Lew is really a film critic, in fact he often goes to Rotten Tomatoes to review movies, he just doesn't work for a gossip newspaper. I really did give him a gift and ask him to write a good movie review for me. If you find him in the middle of the night, you can find him in the Yellow Pages, and then rush from the hotel to Lu's house to watch the movie before commenting. Lou loves my new movie very much, and he would have scored full marks without gifts, but I ruined people's good dreams, how can I not make up for it?

In any case, this is not a lie, every word we say from beginning to end is made up of sincerity, and Lou also introduces himself in his profile. However, this sincerity seems to be too obvious, and it makes some people think of lies as the "truth" of bribery that is not said anywhere.

It's about the attitude towards things, and I very much agree with Bethany Hamilton's remark: "When you get so close to something, it's hard to see what it was or is as it is." (When-youre-really-close-to-something,its-hard-to-see-things-as-they-truly-were-or-are.)" You know, don't just look at what you see at first glance, but look at it from multiple angles and with your heart, otherwise you will be easily deceived by yourself, liars call clichés.

Maybe some people scold me, "It's not that you mislead!" People are swayed by all kinds of misinformation about their concepts and cognitions, so easy to deceive! This is the most terrible thing.

Not... It seems that someone asked me if I was referring to the controversy over the evaluation of "Soul Surfer". Yes, that's right! The generally bad reviews of it by film critics are misleading a part of the audience, not the large part of the audience that is generally highly praised. Some critics complained that the film was a lie, that Bethany was false, and that everyone was acting falsely.

I can't agree with the slightest. First of all, why? Why is Bethany's mentality and behavior fake? None of those bad reviews give a convincing reason, only because of "simplicity", "the characters are too smart", "lack of authenticity", "too much religious emotion"......

Excuse me, excuse me, for Bethany was a very devout Christian, and religious sensibilities were the backbone of her inner world. This movie is about her story, and I can't explore cause and effect, I can only and just want to truthfully reflect her inner face.

I'm an agnostic, but you and I both know that religion is everything to some people, and Bethany never denies it.

"Too much religious emotion" can't be a reason to judge it badly, because that's the Bethany story as it is, it's true. But I'm not boasting, the religious background doesn't prevent an audience from drawing strength from Soul Surfer, and it's definitely not a simple story.

Another part of the critics criticized it as chicken soup for the soul that ignores the pain of reality. Maybe it's because the film's peak of pain doesn't meet their needs — Bethany rolls from one end of the beach to the other in tears, bruises and then gets back up — the problem is that it's not a story like that, and Bethany isn't that kind of person.

For a 13-14-year-old girl, it doesn't take much of a complicated process to get strong and cheer up, and it goes straight to the depths of Bethany's soul, and that's all there is to her darkness. There is no more, more so-called "real" darkness and problems that are yours, not hers, she is already the real her.

Speaking of which, we have a question, a question that has been considered at the stage of adapting the script, whether to have a real Bethany, or a real Bethany in the eyes of critics? If she chooses the latter, she will have to inflict a lot of darkness on her that does not belong to her, and what she thinks, says, and does will be a fake girl in the heart of an adult.

Although I have no intention of making a youth movie, I don't want to make a fake Bethany story. So I chose the former, one who woke up after being attacked by a shark and lost his left arm, and the first thing he said was "When will I be able to surf again?", retraining a month later, and returning to the sea two months later, with pain, but stronger and real Bethany.

Growing older does not mean that people have more courage, and it is usually the opposite that makes people lose courage.

Proverbs such as "The more wisdom in life, the less courage" and "The newborn bear is not afraid of the wolves" also tell us this, and this is exactly what happened to Bethany, whose courage came from several sources, and I dare say one of them was her youth.

When you are old, you feel that it should be more painful, more struggling, more complicated when you change your mentality, and that happens to an old person, not her! Why don't you want to put aside your prejudices and look at this 13-year-old girl? Don't you see her eyes full of innocent hope?

The so-called youthful courage is not to think so much, to believe that all dreams can come true, Bethany believes that adults do not easily or even never believe, so she has created miracles, instead of still struggling with whether to continue surfing. But she also has the fickleness of a girl (and boys), she has frustrations, she has cried, she wants to give up, what she doesn't have is an iron determination or a cinematic awakening that no longer has troubles, even if she becomes a surfing champion, she will still have the next and next frustration and frustration.

"Soul Surfer" already presents the most authentic Bethany, I don't understand how this can be fake?

I don't even understand why "why is it a feature and not a documentary?" why are there biopics? Why are you a film critic? Why am I writing this journal? I want to know why.

Then again, I still know a little bit about what you want, a black coach, or an old man, or best of all, a black old man coach with a white wool beard who was in Shawshank Prison. Then my film has a shield of political correctness, which is much scarier than God.

But how many such "coach-player" movies do we have? good and bad, praised and scolded, adapted from real fiction?

"Pink League" (1992), "Ride on Ice" (1993), "Tea Boy" (1998), "Glory Days" (2000), "Mind Pitcher" (2002), "Coach Carter" (2005), "Reinvigorating the Ball" (2006, still in theaters), "We Are Marshall" (scheduled for 12-22 this year......

Oh my God! there are too many to count, but to name a few representative, it seems that the world can't function without the coach (sorry, my football coaches, I love you!), no, we still have GUCCI, if you don't like PRADA, who doesn't love pandas?

It's the biggest cliché of Hollywood sports movies, as if the only legitimate person to educate the protagonist in this type of film is the coach, and that everyone else is too smart to do so, even if it's the protagonist's parents. Please, who wouldn't say a few words "everything will be fine"?

Everyone, everything will be fine!

Fake, this thing can't get better. First of all, I have to say that I am a film critic myself, and some of my friends who know me well probably know that no offense is coming, and I am going to start being rude, and there are some fools in the film critic world! But I'm sure they'll praise me for my talent again this year, twice.

In addition, this is not my first initiative today, it is just a parody of David Merrick. Maybe some people don't know what's going on, but I'll tell you briefly.

Legendary theater producer David Merrick (1911-2000, "Hello, Dolly!" and other works won a total of 9 Tony Awards, 28 nominations, and 2 honorable mentions) Before his new play "Subways-Are-For-Sleeping" opened in 1961, he expected that the seven major New York drama critics Howard Taubman, Walter Cole, John Chapman, John McLean, Richard Watts Jr., Norman Nadal and Robert Coleman will slam the musical and then ......

Merrick found seven ordinary citizens with the same name and surname from the Yellow Pages of New York, invited them to see an internal performance of the new play and obtained the right to use their names, coaxed them into saying clichés such as "the greatest musical comedy of the last thirty years," "the best musical of all time," and "a fabulous musical, I love it," and then ran a full-page ad in the New York Herald listing the reviews and names (in bold type) of the seven critics.

The "rave reviews" musical ran for 205 performances for almost six months, and the audience was so happy that no one cared what the other group of critics said.

Are you going to say that the audience is misled? This may be the essence of how fame and criticism affect the audience, when you look at a certain work with the psychology of pilgrimage and tolerance, everything is good, and the bad can be tolerated or make excuses to become good, you always see its good; when you look at it with suspicion and criticism, everything is bad, a little bad cannot be tolerated, the good can become bad, you always see its bad.

This was the case in 1961, and it is still like this today, not just about how to look at a work, but when looking at any thing, objectivity and assertiveness rarely show their faces.

But it turns out that in this day and age, you can't use this trick to deceive the world for six months, and the paparazzi are really everywhere.

When it comes to David Merrick, people praised him for his wit, scolded him for false propaganda, and now most of them talk about good things. A lot of things need time to judge, and I've put it here, 45 years later, when people talk about the "Lou-Ramnik incident", they will only laugh and praise me as funny, and maybe say, "Look at it, look at it, Ye Wei was willing to sacrifice his reputation in order to warn the world, what a good person! ”

Seriously, it's so much fun, hahaha.

What the...... What's even more fun? Owen Greymanman is in the limelight again? Check out another article that has been updated at the same time, "It's Time to Review the Critics." 】