I don't really play very well, it's just a family talk. Pen Fun Pavilion wWw. ｂiquge。 info Objections are welcome.

The strength is divided into, super first-class, first-class, second-rate, third-rate, and non-stream.

The arms are divided into ranged, cavalry, and infantry. Among them, dogs and archers are also counted as cavalry. Catapults also count as ranged. The reason for this classification is that it takes into account the buildings produced. Temple classes are counted on a case-by-case basis. Vehicles are counted as ranged or cavalry, depending on the situation. Because of the different angles of considering the problem, it may be different from the actual battle. Note, however, that I'm thinking about a combination of battles and custom battles. And the classification of the troops is still different from the past. Also, the temple bonus aspect is basically not considered.

Start now,

Rome

Superb infantry. There's really nothing to say about this, and one of the top three infantry is in Rome. And there's the Eagle Banner in town. If we talk about the early days, young soldiers are also extremely strong.

First-class cavalry. The main consideration for this is the bonus points after the horse reform. The Legion Cavalry, which is the main force, performs well. The Imperial Guard is one of the top cavalrymen. There was also the javelin cavalry auxiliary, and the strength of the cavalry on the Roman side was completely different from history. But because of the factors before the horse reform, as well as the lack of archers in Rome, and the powerful and messy Parthian cavalry, it can only be said that the Roman cavalry was first-class, not super-first-class. As for dogs and fire pigs, that doesn't add much points.

Best-in-class remote. The long-range of Rome before the horse reform was really not good. But after the horse reform, the attached archers can also be regarded as high-level bows, and the range is sufficient. And with so many machines to assist, Rome's long-range is definitely not to be underestimated.

In summary, Rome was extremely strong militarily, taking into account the advantages of its geographical location and various buildings. Rome is really the best choice for newbies.

Egypt

First-class infantry. Not only does it have a good phalanx (the performance of the Pharaoh's guard is quite good). And there's also the Desert Axe Step to protect the flanks. It's not an exaggeration to give a first-class evaluation, but at 1.5, because the desert axe was beaten back to its prototype, the infantry strength of Egypt will drop a lot.

First-class cavalry. Although the axe cavalry is no longer so powerful in the later period, Yu Wei is still there, and considering the Nile cavalry, and I count the chariot into the cavalry. It's not too much to give a first-class one. In fact, one of the great uses of Egyptian archers was to demoralize the enemy's cavalry, because it was camel archers. (Although the archers of Egypt are always forgotten...... ）

Best-in-class remote. Although in later editions the early archers of Egypt were no longer supernumerated. But Egypt also had the pharaoh's bow, one of the strongest archers, in existence. Not only that, but there are also giant catapults with great power. In fact, Egypt's long-range is simply unreasonable.

To sum up, it can be seen that Egypt is an extremely strong country. What's really annoying about Egypt is that its class mix makes it extremely difficult to deal with. If there is a phalanx alone, it is not a big deal, and you can charge it with cavalry. But Egypt had chariots. If you just say that there is a tank, it is easy to deal with, shoot it from a distance. But Egypt's long-range is extremely powerful. If it's simple long-range power, it's easy to deal with. But the Egyptian long-range was covered by phalanxes and cavalry, as well as chariots...... Add to this the strategic advantages of explosive population growth. Egypt has always been a headache for players.

Selegu

First-class infantry. Needless to say, the phalanx series, plus the Silver Shield Legion. There is nothing wrong with saying that Selegu's infantry is first-class. Although the cost performance of the Silver Shield infantry is a little unsightly, it is also possible to form a tortoiseshell formation outside of Rome.

Superb cavalry. The reason for this is that the elephants are also included in the cavalry when considering the buildings produced. Considering that the scythe chariot is a melee combat, it is also counted as cavalry. Then there are two elite cavalry of Iron Armor and Companion Cavalry, and there is nothing wrong with saying that Selegu's cavalry is superb.

Third-rate remote. The reason for this is that Seleucus had only ordinary archers and no long-range archers. And there are no giant trebuchets either.

In general, Seleucus was strong, but in battles, due to its geographical location, it was always destroyed very early. Due to the unfavorable geographical location, it is not recommended for beginners to use it in battle. But it's cool to experience a formed Selegu army in custom combat.

Armenia

Second-rate infantry. Heavy spearmen, copycat regiments...... So Armenia is a second-rate infantryman. It should be mentioned, however, that among the eastern countries, its infantry is only moderate. Because Pontus is also an eastern country! The phalanx of Pontus is extremely strong. But it can be said that Armenia has the strongest infantry among the countries with high-level archers.

Superb cavalry. The reason for this evaluation is that the ironclad archers are also counted in the cavalry. The Iron Archer and the Iron Archer are really a very refreshing combination.

Third-rate remote. The reason for this is that archers are not counted in the range. If the archers are also counted in the range, the range of Armenia is definitely not weak.

Greece

Superb infantry. There really isn't much to say about this, the Greek infantry was recognized as powerful. The price-performance ratio of heavy helmets, the powerful ...... of Sparta It should be pointed out that it was not only Sparta that was able to produce Sparta in Greece, but also Syracuse.

Third-rate cavalry. The Greek cavalry was truly a tragedy. But the bad militia knights can still give a little extra points. After forming a group, it can still play a role.

Second-rate remote. This evaluation is also due to the consideration of siege equipment such as giant trebuchets, as well as heavy javelinmen. Since mercenaries are not considered, there is no talk of bows.

Macedonia

First-class infantry. The Macedonian phalanx is famous all over the world, but because of the difference in the combat effectiveness of the royal guns in the case of different versions. In the end, it can only be said that it is a first-class infantryman

First-class cavalry. The Macedonian cavalry was also very powerful, but if you experiment with the battle with the iron armor, you will find that the companion cavalry is not so powerful, so it can only be said to be first-class cavalry rather than super-first-class cavalry.

Second-rate remote. Although the archers of Macedonia were unstoppable with the blessing of the temple. However, after all, the range is insufficient, and this article does not consider the temple bonus much. However, there are also giant trebuchets that add points.

Dacia

First-class infantry. Dacia's Scythe Warriors have a battle cry, plus a selection of swordsmen. All things considered, it can be said that Dacia's infantry division is first-class.

Second-rate cavalry. The barbarian aristocratic cavalry is indeed good. But if you compare it horizontally, for example, with your partner, ironclad, and holy order, it can only be said that it is quite expensive. Only it could not hold up the sky, so it was said to be a second-rate cavalry.

Best-in-class remote. The reason for this is that Dacia could make archers very early and had such advanced archers as the Featured Bow. And then consider the siege engines of Dacia. It's not an exaggeration to say that it's top-notch remote.

Personally, I think that Dacia is actually a good choice to play Barbarian. After all, it also has a selection of swords, a noble horse, a selection of bows, and even siege engines.

Parthian

Infantry. That's all I can call the Parthian infantry...... The Oriental infantry had the notoriety of the Oriental peasantry, and the hill soldiers were not bad.

Superb cavalry. Ironclad horsemen, Persian archers, ironclad camels, elephants. Thus armed, the Parthian cavalry was unstoppable. It is completely possible to trample the Macedonian cavalry, the Roman cavalry. The Parthian cavalry was absolutely superb. In fact, if you want to play full riding, then one of the best options is Parthia.

Third-rate remote. The reason for this is simply that the archers are not counted in the range.

Scythia

Third-rate infantry. The infantry of this country is still stronger than the infantry of Parthia......

Superb cavalry. Similarly, if you want to play full riding, you can consider Scythia. The archers, the cavalry of the Scythian nobility, and the headhuntswoman had long been the formidable cavalry force of Scythia.

Best-in-class remote. The presence of a selection of bows, plus siege equipment. Without counting the archers, Scythia's long-range is still top-notch.

Gaul

First-class infantry. This score is given entirely because of the selection of swords.

Second-rate cavalry. The noble cavalry is really ordinary compared to other high-ranking cavalry.

Best-in-class remote. That's why I say that. This is because although Gaul had hunters who were among the strongest archers, Gaul did not have siege weapons after all. And in my division, siege weapons are also divided into range.

Pontus

First-class infantry. The combat effectiveness of the Pontus phalanx is definitely not bad, and the Bronze Shield Legion is even more elite.

First-class cavalry. If the Pontus-style iron armor has an armor crushing club, it can be said that the Bendu is a super-first-class cavalry. It's just the lack of armor breakers. However, the combination of the Pontus Heavy Cavalry and the Pontus-style Iron Armor team is still good. The javelin full screen is very threatening,

Second-rate remote. Pontus's long-range is not weak, but there is nothing special about it.

Germanic

Superb infantry. The furious battle of one of the three top infantry, plus a selection of axes, an early phalanx. The Germanic infantry was one of the most elite.

First-class cavalry. Not only is it quite expensive, but there is also goth, so this evaluation is given.

Second-rate remote. Although there are selected bows, after all, there are no engineering equipment, so I say so.

Britain

First-class infantry. The reasons are the same as those of Gaul. In fact, they are all Celtics.

Third-rate cavalry. In the case of British chariots being counted as cavalry, British cavalry is third-rate......

Remote without inflow. Because one of the criteria for evaluating long-range is range, Britannia is unfortunate to be evaluated by me as long-range. Although the bow chariot is good, it cannot go up the wall and has insufficient range.

Carthage.

First-class infantry. In this way, it is mainly for the sake of the Holy Order, followed by the Punic infantry. Otherwise, just the rotten infantry in the early days...... It should have ......

The cavalry of the super-stream. I don't need to say the superiority of the long shield. The Order is also a high-ranking cavalryman. On top of that, Carthage had war elephants.

Third-rate remote. The reason for this is that war elephants are not counted as long-ranged. Carthage is a wound without archers.

Spain

First-class infantry. I said this because of the Spanish shield soldiers and bulls.

Third-rate cavalry. The long shield is excellent, but it can't be done without heavy riding.

Remote without inflow. In fact, the Spanish long-range is weaker than the British one......

Thrace

First-class infantry. Although many people feel that the evaluation is too high. But the combination of phalanx + running fast infantry is still good.

Third-rate cavalry. The weakness of the cavalry can only be said of that.

Third-rate remote. Only the combination of archer + catapult can only get this rating.

Numidia

Second-rate infantry. The morale of the desert infantry was high. But the Copycat Legion is really not good. It can only be said that fighting in the desert, Numidia can still be said to be second-rate infantry. Out of the desert, it is reduced to a third-rate.

First-class cavalry. It is very good for javelin riding, plus long shields, camel riding. It's a pity that there is no heavy riding is a hard injury. After leaving the desert, it can only be said to be a second-rate cavalry.

Third-rate remote. The combination of archer + trebuchet can only get this rating.