Here's what happened: A reader F posted a post criticizing the plot of the book in the book review section.

I delete the post.

Reader F posted another post, expressing his speechlessness at the deletion of the previous post, and then began to swipe the evaluation votes.

I deleted reader F's second post and banned it.

Reader F swipes the evaluation vote again.

――――

To put it simply, that's what happened. If there is any inappropriateness, please correct it.

Then I'll respond, why did you delete your first post?

There have been a lot of posts complaining about the slow plot lately, and there are also a lot of posts questioning the contract part, why did I let go of the others and delete yours?

Because your tone is too bad and you are too aggressive.

You say you're complaining, but in my opinion, it's a simple response to a reader in the book review area, because well-intentioned criticism is never so heavy. I'm open to criticism from readers, but I reject all condescending complaints. I'm only writing books, and so far it's only a public chapter, so I don't owe anyone anything, and I don't have to endure anyone's cynicism.

Then from another point of view, you think that as a reader, you are high, comparable to God, and can do whatever you want with the author and the work, then if you send out a post, I, as a viewer and administrator of the book review area, can naturally do whatever I want with your post.

In addition, during the period of strong promotion, I don't think it is too much to maintain the basic harmony of the book review area, compared to the truly harmonious book review area, I am still merciful.

As long as my tone is calm, I don't care about criticism or praise at all, and if a critic is photographed by readers, I will still persuade him. All these book review areas are also recorded, and everyone can watch them at will.

Only those who are full of superiority and spray when they come up, I never want to see them, and I don't think anyone will really want to see them. It's not like you're going to spit on yourself, right?

In fact, after the first deletion of the post, you posted a post asking what was going on, and I wanted to reply to you, but when I looked up, I saw dozens of reviews in response to a reader in the book review area.

Well, since you don't have the will to communicate, then I can only exercise my negligible rights, right?

――――

By the way, online writer is actually a very fragile profession, why use the word vulnerable? Because an inexplicable reader, spending 80 yuan, can leave an extremely disgusting trace on your work and even your identity as a writer. In this process, the author is powerless, and what is even more interesting is that for those who love this work, it will cost at least several times or even more than ten times the price to erase this trace.

The destructive power of one person is so staggering.

What's even more amazing is that as long as there is such a reader, the author can be disturbed, for a simple example, now reader f is merciful, just swiped 80 yuan of evaluation votes, if he is willing to spend that idle time, register dozens or hundreds of vests, and brush the book review area with scolding posts, then I even have to close the book review area. And these are so harmful to a work on the eve of the shelves that it is incomparable.

So, I remember when a reader in the book review section said that he hoped that I could let go of my graduation thesis, internship, and concentrate on writing a book, I was speechless.

In such an environment, if there is no real work support, if you don't treat writing as a part-time job, if you have to worry about the consequences of every such destruction......

What else do you write?

c！！！