Reading a book, if you always take [the protagonist won't die, so you can wave casually, everyone else is a fool, and 10,000 years of hard work is not as good as the protagonist's hard work for more than ten years] as a premise, then what's the point?

Because the protagonist will not die, so whether the protagonist is a little deflated three, a little rascal, or a wise man, a warrior, or a saint, it actually makes no difference, because they will not die, they are all the same.

"What, your protagonist is a saint, and you can't blow up a planet with one punch? Look at my protagonist, every day, the beautiful women around him are like clouds, and he can destroy a universe with a flick of his fingers. Your protagonist can't. ”

"You actually sacrificed the blue-eyed white dragon. Wait for me, let me add 10 more zeros to my card's attack power. ”

"Ahh ”

"I'll add 12. ”

“13。 ”

“14。 ”

Such, isn't it interesting?

So, are you reading a story, or are you judging a book from above?

I guess Mr. Gu Long was also scolded by readers like this, so he wrote Chu Liuxiang to death in "Midnight Orchid", and I guess he also suffered the same speechlessness at that time.

But the author thinks that it is much better to take reasonable actions to avoid risks, to cross the passing line as much as possible, or to reach 80 or 90 points, than to "the protagonist will not die anyway, and you can't do 100 points anyway, just like me", right?

"Long Live the Imperial Brother" about an inexplicable point (spitting) is hitting in the hand, please wait a moment,

Once the content is updated, please refresh the page again to get the latest updates!