I declare that the following statements are true (from my point of view)

The incident is very simple, and the state is not serious, but because I have never experienced it and do not understand the relevant laws, I hereby seek help from a book friend who understands the relevant law and is surrounded by a person who is engaged in the legal profession (lawyer, or related practitioners). Pen, fun, and www.biquge.info

Event Course:

In the process of going to work, the client was attacked by a man A (empty-handed), and then man B stepped forward (claiming to be accompanied by man A), saying that man A was mentally ill.

(After Man A assaulted the client, he did not flee and there was no sign of a follow-up attack.) Standing on one side by man B stepped forward to negotiate)

The person reported to the police (the person did not have a physical or verbal altercation with Male A)

(Man B calls Man A's family, and within a few minutes, the family arrives at the scene, which is Man A's mother and sister.) ）

110 took the person to the nearest police station.

(Skip the process of recording the event file...... ）

I (I) rushed to the police station.

Police officer's opinion: Seek medical attention first (Man A struck the person on the head with his limbs and without warning, causing the person to sit down due to dizziness. ）

Seek medical attention: according to CT, there is no obvious intracranial injury, bruise on the head, blood spots on the scalp, and a goose egg lump on the head.

The person accompanying the medical treatment (the mother of man A) thought that there was no major problem, and verbally persuaded him that he did not need to be hospitalized for medical treatment, and negotiated to deal with it.

The person concerned (frightened and speech-imbalanced) asked to be hospitalized for observation for the sake of prudence.

(First take injection injection, swelling and stasis and other treatment methods, during the injection process, the person has symptoms such as dizziness and vomiting, and the doctor is suspected of concussion, the degree is unknown.) ）

------------

At this point, I (I) returned to the police station to deal with follow-up matters.

On-site personnel: police officers A, B, myself (me);

Police Officer A (suspected to be a leader of a police station)

Police Officer B (Temporary Worker Wei of the Police Station)

-------------

The police officer persuaded me (me) to:

The big thing turned into a small matter, and the other party was a mentally ill person (the police officer claimed that he could not detain a mentally ill person [I did not see the so-called psychiatric medical records]. ）。

On the grounds that the other party is a mentally ill person, they claim that they have no right to detain, that the other party has no criminal responsibility, and other factors, and want to persuade them (me) to settle privately.

Although I have heard that "it is not illegal for a mentally ill person to beat someone", I (I) did not agree with the opinion of police officers A and B that they were eager to close the case because I felt that the attitude of police officers A and B was inconsistent between the attitude of police officers A and B before recording their statements and after the confession was recorded.

[Ma note: I personally suspect that in the process of taking the party to seek medical treatment, the party is not present, and the other party's family says good words or other py transactions. 】

Police officer A and B said the original words: Ask the other party to give you a few hundred yuan to drink soup (nutrition fee), the other party's special situation (mental illness), difficult conditions (7 years of psychiatric treatment, no money, you can't extort the other party's money), anyway, you can't make trouble with the other party (we have no right to detain the other party), if the other party (guardian, other party's parents) doesn't care, you have no problem, it is better to negotiate through them (police officers A and B) private...... Wait a minute;

I suspected that police officers A and B had abnormal attitudes and did not agree, so I insisted on seeking medical treatment first.

-------------

At this point, it is the general course of the incident, and after questioning friends, it is learned that police officers A and B are anxious to close the case does not match what they said (the mentally ill person has no criminal liability, but has civil liability, and is related to the guardian).

-------------

At present, when the person is seeking medical treatment, the doctor's opinion is observed first.

(1: Due to the person's vomiting during the medical treatment, it was preliminarily judged to be a concussion, and the doctor's opinion was that the symptoms would last for about 9 days).

(2: The party concerned initially asked for 10 days of leave from the work unit because of this matter.) ）

-------------Above!

Although the matter is not very serious (the person concerned is still recovering), I would like to consult how to deal with it afterwards (involving compensation, lawsuits, etc.)

The attitude of the other party's family is relatively bad (the first contact, saying that you have thrown a few hundred yuan, and you still plan to blackmail us? and you are not dead!)

(Ma note: I'm strange, we are victims, right? Do we deserve to be beaten?)

Therefore, although the matter is not big and the person is fine, but the heart is very unhappy, such as through legal channels, how should it be operated?

(Even, when I questioned police officers A and B, I jokingly said: Now that everyone beats people is so arrogant? Is there any royal law?The police officer replied: Hey! It's so arrogant, don't you know yet? If he doesn't care about his family, you will lose both people and money, so you might as well take a few hundred yuan to buy some soup to drink and replenish your body!)

(Ma note: I hope I am not in the black river crab god...... ）

At this point, online, etc., I hope that there are friends who understand the relevant regulations to reply for reference!