This is Xiao Hei, that is, my notebook, which contains the decipherment of the Seven Commandments of the Brave.

Seriously, I can figure out what it says and why. If you don't like spoilers, skip it!

If you want to know it as soon as possible, then you can take it with you a thorough reading of the plot.

And then there will be my thoughts on the mechanism of the brave.

First of all, here are my excerpts from the Seven Commandments of the Brave:

1. The brave cannot betray their companions.

2. The brave cannot tell others about their identity.

3. The brave cannot kill anyone except who is the enemy of mankind with any weapon.

4. The brave cannot kill any brave man, even if there will be a reward.

5. The brave cannot use their own strength to help anyone except pure human beings.

6. The brave cannot judge who is the traitor among the brave just because of non-substantive clues.

7. The brave cannot break the above rules, otherwise they must die.

The above are the seven commandments of the brave, so do these things mean something? Are they talking about the secret of the brave in this world?

I think, definitely.

If there is no God's existence, or God's interference, then it means that there must be something that interferes with the thinking of the brave!

So what is it?

I think that the admonition of the brave is a very important thing, that is, this thing of unknown meaning is the most likely to bring about unexpected changes.

First of all, the first -

There's nothing to say about that.

But the question is, what is a companion? Is the person who is with you called a companion? Or is it your friend? Or is it some other brave person?

It's hard to say anything like a companion. If today you are a companion and tomorrow you are an enemy, and today you betray him, tomorrow your punishment will be a problem: why should you punish the one who betrayed the enemy?

Therefore, the first article has a lot of problems, and it is quite vague, and I don't know if it is intentional.

Article 2 -

Do not share your identity with others.

It's hard to say about identity, but if it's an identity card, you don't need to "inform"?

If you give the identity card directly to someone else, is this considered "informed"? If it doesn't, then the problem really comes.

That being the case, the Seven Commandments are a complete play on words!

Article 3 -

The Brave cannot kill anyone with any weapon other than those who are enemies of humanity

First of all, what is a weapon?

For example, if I hit you on the head with a flower pot today, is the flower pot a weapon?

No.

Well, that is, you can kill, you can kill the enemies of humanity, and you can kill your companions, as long as you don't use weapons.

The second point: to be the enemy of humanity.

Humans, as the name suggests, are the entire human race.

But how can the opinions of mankind be the same? The enemy can only be said to be the majority of humanity, but what if it is the enemy of a small number of people? But a small number of people are not human anymore?

This is a big bug.

The third point: the brave can't.

Since you can't be brave, but I can find someone who isn't brave!

This one is even more problematic than the first two, indicating that it is even encouraging the brave to plot against each other!

Article 4 -

Heroes cannot kill any Heroes, even if there is a reward.

This statement has already been said obviously, there will be rewards.

But what is that reward?

The Brave were eleven, and at the beginning there were twelve holy weapons.

Needless to say, this article is simply an explicit indication of infighting.

Article 5 -

The brave cannot use their power to help anyone but pure humans.

This one has nothing to say, and it is impeccable.

The only problem is the brave. And if it is "the power of one's own", what if it is the "power of weapons"?

Article 6 -

The brave cannot judge who is a traitor among the brave just because of non-substantive clues.

"Brave" again!

And to say that it is "non-substantial", what about me? That is, I am only being doubted, not judged?

This clearly proves the point, which implies that we:

All can be traitors, and all can be against you.

Then, it's strange that the brave don't fight among themselves!

The last one –

The brave must not break the above rules, otherwise they must die.

"Must die", this sentence is very doubtful.

Who doesn't die, even if it's the immortal brave and the dragon?

When the world collapses, such as a galactic cataclysm, or the sun becomes a red giant, and magic is useless, who doesn't die?

And didn't even say when he would die!

This sentence is mysterious, and it may even be saying:

"Hurry up and fight in the house! I'm going to die anyway. There will be rewards!"

So, in these seven admonitions that can be heard or not, isn't it just promoting infighting?!

Also, because of the hidden identity tag, the conflict is also intensified.

Finally, I would like to ask a question:

Why are there 11 braves?

11, why not 10 or 12?

Because this is a prime number, any infighting that turns into a gang will inevitably lead to a strong force on the one hand!

This fully proves the inevitability of infighting!

If the brave live forever, why haven't we seen the last summoned hero?

Were they all really killed?

Is the power of the Sacred Weapon so weak?

So where did it go?

This can only be said:

Maybe, really kill the dragon and wipe it out, maybe, the internal fighting will be wiped out, maybe, all plot.

The first point is possible, but the second point is impossible! The third point is the most likely!

In other words, someone snooped on the hero's holy weapon and identity.

Who else can there be? Those who intensify the contradictions of the brave, those who desire strength, and those who have plotted against many brave men must be the old people, those who now hold power, and those who have strength......

It can only be a king.

However, the king's enemies are ostensibly dragons, but they are actually brave men. Seriously, according to human wisdom, it is impossible for even a kingdom to be destroyed!

It can only be said that the king is the friend of the dragon and the enemy of the brave.

The king is a dragon! How else would a kingdom with prestige reign no less than a dragon!

What's more, some people say that only monsters can have dragons? Who said that dragons must look like dragons in my original world!

For the survival of all of us who have traveled through time, I must ask the age of the king—