readx;? This book has been revised, and does not take the chronology of the Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties, mainly because its basis is unclear, and the chronology between the dynasties is not at all in accordance with the Ganzhi chronology of the "Bamboo Book Chronicle", and it is an official history, which can only be used as a database, but only has reference significance (Jian Bozan). Pen | fun | pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 ｉｎｆｏ

And there are obvious errors in its chronology, for example, although the first year of the republic seems to have been determined to be BC841, but according to the Ganzhi chronology of the "Bamboo Book Chronicle", the first year of the republic is the year of Gengshen, and the 12 zodiac signs belong to the year of the Shen monkey, which is BC840, so the addition of a sentence to change the yuan in the Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties project is purely apocryphal.

According to the rules of the ancient emperors: after the death of the previous emperor or after the loss of power, regardless of whether the later king held the power in the same year, he would not use the last year of the previous king as the first year of his dynasty (the ancients did not have the concept of zero, so the first year was the first year).

Therefore, regardless of whether the time of the Chinese rebellion, Gongbo, and the year of 841 BC is the first month of the month of the first month, it can only be counted from the first month of the second year, that is, BC840, as the first year of the Gongbo peace. It was the ruling practice of the Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties, and the kings of the later Zhou dynasties also followed this practice, otherwise it would cause confusion in the chronology. So in fact, the statement of BC841 in the Xinhua dictionary or history books is wrong, and it should be BC840.

The rules of the ancients reflect their seriousness, not that those who are in power are counted as emperors, if this is the case, then those powerful ministers in history are not counted as emperors. Therefore, the emperor must have officially ascended the throne. Therefore, the mourning time after the death of the emperor in history is not considered the time of the emperor's reign, which is also called the period of no king.

This is not the same as in modern times. Modern people do not have such clear rules, and when they take power, they immediately build a country and ascend the throne. Therefore, the mention of the dynastic project is purely a modern man's dating method to copy it rigidly to ancient times, and there is a joke.

The year of the Yellow Emperor's enshrinement of Chan BC2697 remains unchanged, and after reigning for 100 years, they are Zuo Che Regency (7 years), Emperor Qianhuang (reigned 47 years), Emperor Zhuan Xuan (reigned 78 years), Emperor Yu (reigned 63 years), Emperor Zhi (reigned 9 years), Emperor Yao (reigned 100 years), and Emperor Shun (reigned 50 years).

Emperor Yu to Ji (Xia reigned in 491 years), during which the kings experienced different times of mourning without kings.

After the soup, there was no funeral custom, and he directly changed the yuan to the king in the second year. Tang Zhi Xuan (reign of Shang 628). Therefore, it is in line with Wen Zhong's mention of Shang Tang's 600-year foundation in "Romance of the Gods". Although it is a mythological novel, there must be a reason for its origin.

King Wu of Zhou to the last years of King Li's reign (from 841 to 269 years). King Wu of Zhou to King You (from 770 to 340 years). King Ping to King Yin (Hao) (the Eastern Zhou lasted from 294 years to a total of 476 years), so together King Wu of Zhou to King Yin a total of 816 years. Therefore, history says that the 800 years of Zhou have a reason.

After the Eastern Zhou Dynasty was destroyed by Qin to Qin to unify the six countries, it experienced a period of no emperor for several decades, which can also be called the period of no king.

The opinions of this book, everyone is welcome to comment, thank you!!