readx;?? Therefore, the arrangement of the Sumerian king's table is very particular: they seem to think that it is abnormal for people to live longer than 60, indicating that the Sumerian people's life expectancy was generally not long at that time, and in the Sumerian king's table, it is common to change kings once every few years, and if the reign period is more than 60 years, it is almost impossible, and even if the dynasty is prosperous, it is unlikely to exceed twice as much as 360 years, and the number within 360 is usually taken. Pen "Fun" Pavilion www.biquge.info

And this is in effective contrast with the years of China's dynasties, even if the longest Zhou is 800 years, but in fact, it is needless to say that the **** behind, and it can basically be divided into two dynasties (Eastern Zhou and Western Zhou) It is consistent with the implied meaning of the king's table, and the feudal society period is even more so.

This is not to say that the 360-base system has been adopted, and the age of a certain dynasty must be less than that of the 360-base system. The main reason is that the Sumerians believe that the king is a god, so they always use some kind of rule to make the number of years of their reign larger, how big, for example, the basic timekeeping unit is 3600 years, which is scary enough!

And in fact, these are all scary, you can directly look at such a big number as 36,000 as 280, why?

The conversion of the Sumerians to 60 to 360 is extremely complicated. Different from the general chronology, it is mainly based on division, and the large number is not necessarily larger than the small number, which involves a cyclic counting method like a dry branch. In addition, there is also a mixed system of 60 and 360, plus the rules for the selection of divisible multiples and remainders, etc.

To put it simply: 36000/36 = 1000, 1000-360x2 = > 36000 years are the same as 1000 years and 280 years in the Sumerian chronology.

Similarly, if it is 18000/36=500, 500-360=140 is the same calculation method.

But what if it's not divisible?

For example, if a dynasty has been in power for 2500 years, the 360 chronology law is applied, and 2500/36 is not divisible.

Then take the remainder directly, that is, 2500-360x6=340, that is, the remainder, then the actual ruling period of the dynasty is 340 years, not 2500 years.

The actual age of the same approach may be different in the base 60 and base 360 systems. Like what:

If a king reigns for 500 years, the 60-digit system can only be applied because of the limited lifespan of people.

The actual number of years in power is 500-60x8=20 years.

If another king reigns for 400 years, the actual reign is 400-60x6=40 years.

Therefore, the former who has been in power for 500 years has actually been in power for 20 years less than the latter for 400 years.

Decimals such as 400 have no difference between base 60 and base 360.

But if the number 2500 is already known to be => but if the number 2500 is calculated in the 60 decimal system, the result will be very different:

2500 is also not divisible in the 60-base system, so the remainder is 2500-60x6x6=340, but this is the method of the 360-base system, and the 60-base system needs to further take the remainder, that is, within 60 as the remainder result. The final result is 40 years. That is, 2500 means the same thing as 40 in the 60 decimal place.

Of course, for a single number, singular numbers such as 3 and 5 are the same for both.

The number 120 is used in the 60-decimal system, 120/6 = 20, and 81 is 81-60 = 21. 79=19。 59=59。

So it looks like the number 59 is bigger than the number 120. So 60 is not bigger than 59, not necessarily.

60/6=10, so in fact, the number 60 is also uncertain in the base of 60, and its meaning needs to be compared with historical truth or relevant data to determine whether to take 10 or 60. You must know that the number 10 never appears in the Sumerian King Table. It must have appeared in the 60's.

We saw the large number 36000 earlier, and the result we get after calculation is =1000-360x2=280 in the 360 decimal system, but if you follow the integer algorithm of the 60-base system (note that the calculation method of remainder and divisibility is completely different, the divisor needs to be divisible until the remainder appears, the divisor of the 60-base system is 6, and the divisor of the 360-base system is 36): 36000/6=6000/6=1000-16x60=40.

The same is 36000 years in the 360 base system = 280 years. But if it is said that the reign of a certain king is not 36000 but 36001 years, how can this be calculated?

Because it is not divisible, it is directly taken as a remainder, that is, 36001-60x600=1, that is, 36001 has the same meaning as 1 year, but if this is an expression of a certain dynasty, then it cannot be as short as 1 year, then it is also simple, only 1+360=361 years, that is, the dynasty ruled for 361 years, but if a certain king was in power, maybe he died in a year, of course, it is possible to live a long life to 61, but 121 such a thing is too mysterious, it seems that the Yellow Emperor and Di Yao had been in power for 100 years before dying, and the legend of the Yellow Emperor is far more than the substance, and Di Yao has been in office for almost 30 years when he died, and he is basically in the stage of retirement. In fact, he was in power for 70 years. However, this also shows that in ancient times, the ancestors of the Chinese lived longer than the Sumerians, which may be the reason for the production of the "Yellow Emperor's Inner Canon". Of course, this is off-topic.

Understanding these dating methods, including the traditional Chinese Ganzhi chronology, is very close to the real history. Of course, no one can know the real history unless it travels through time and space, and it is enough for modern people to just hope to be infinitely close to the truth of history, and even if they can't, finding a reason that can explain everything is also a way to treat history.

Therefore, the algorithm of the Sumerian king's table, I think this is the case, and I believe that no one will jump out and say that I have seen them calculate it with my own eyes, so as an academic discussion, I believe that it is still possible, and the author uses this method to perfectly match the historical stages of Sumerian civilization with various historical records.

The results of the Common Era that I have published are the result of my personal study of Sumerian royal watches.

"Badtibila declined, and royal power shifted to Lalrak. ”

En Sipad Sid Anna en--ana, reigned: 80 BC, 3572-3492 BC. Prefix: The Great King or the short for Enki, and Suffix: Eanna.

;