First, let's talk about the contents of the third volume.

In fact, I have been foreshadowing it from the beginning, and some book lovers should be aware of Euclid's special features from the beginning.

Even if I use this whole volume, I can't capture the greatness of Euclid.

Both in reality and in the world of magic, Euclid was greater than he could have imagined.

In the same way, the greatness of Aristotle is the same, and so is the greatness of Thales, Pythagoras, Eudox, and so on.

Well...... I know there is some controversy about the history of Greece, but it doesn't matter, I even think of those characters as a kind of symbol, they are just "representatives of the wisdom of the sages", the important thing is that the wisdom of the sages is there, they move the world forward and benefit each of us.

They make humans surpass animals and make humans better people.

I won't talk about the details, I haven't recovered from this episode, so I won't go into details.

Two, I always said before, there are some things to be said in the third volume or at the end, and now I can finally say something.

Regarding the choice of this book "World of the Gods", I said before that I originally wanted to write about Eastern and Western religions, but in the end I realized that in an era when many things could not be written, it was impossible to write that type, and then, I transferred this book.

So why did I write this book this way?

As I thought about it later, there were probably three main reasons.

First, like.

Although it is a bit headstrong to say this, I insist that an author can only write good work if he writes what he really likes and truly believes.

Second, because some readers said that they had read the previous book "Confucianism and Taoism" many times, and even said it more than ten times.

It scared me a little, and I felt that I wasn't at the level that readers say. So, I'm going to work harder and write content that's worth watching ten times.

Or rather, I'm going to write what I think is the most valuable.

That's what I think, and that's what I do.

Third, I've always had a question.

All the networks I've seen, including the ones that are extremely knowledgeable, are just writing about appearances. Well, the point is up to it, because there is no malice and misunderstanding is avoided, so I won't say it deeply.

To make an intuitive analogy, all the networks are writing about the protagonist climbing from the foot of the mountain to the top of the mountain, in the middle of it, writing about the scenery, writing about the protagonist sweating, writing about the protagonist gritting his teeth and persevering, writing about the protagonist not giving up, etc., etc.......

But, but, but, all of this, does not touch on a particularly important thing, the method of acting, the method of thinking, and the method of method.

I thought, I can write and try.

Then, there was World of the Gods.

Well......

As for the summary of the full text, it cannot be said now.

What I can say is that I struggled to write the first volume, and the second volume was all kinds of entanglements, but since the third volume, the more I write, the more stable I am like an old dog.

It's not that I feel like I'm drifting, but it's really what I want to write and what I like.

I'll admit that what I'm going to write is actually beyond my ability to write, but does that matter? Unimportant.

The important thing is that I believe I like and I act I try.

I tried to stand at the end of my life and ask myself, is it worth writing this book "World of the Gods"?

The answer at the end of life is, it's worth it.

Third, many readers do not accept this kind of online article.

However, online literature is a diverse and diverse world, and the rules of the real world have overwhelmed people.

It's like some readers say that this book is too preachy.

I have no objection, but from another point of view, this is normal explanation and argumentation, which is part of the composition.

The problem is that I haven't been able to write these things in a way that "the general audience likes."

So, I accept criticism from readers and don't oppose it.

So, in my next book, I'm sure I'll focus on improving on that.

On the other hand, I have to explain.

The content I write is either summarized and refined by the top boss in a lifetime, or I have figured it out from the big guy's book, and any single point can be written in a monograph.

Not to mention me, no writer in history can write so many things in a way that "the general reader likes", and even if he does, few people can understand it.

If writers and writers can write those things well, what do they want philosophers and scientists to do?

So, the root of the problem is that it's not that my writing style is wrong, it's that I chose a "writing direction that is not popular enough".

Actually, I have two approaches to writing.

One is to explain some points in detail in the form of explanatory arguments, as is the case now.

The advantage of this is that as long as you look carefully, you can understand that whether to do it or not is another matter.

But the disadvantage is that it destroys a certain reading experience, which is not so cool enough.

The second is the normal way of writing, which is to write knowledge and truth into pure stories.

But I can promise, really, I can really guarantee that if I don't explain, no one will see what I'm trying to say except myself.

Who dares to say that "Dream of Red Mansions" is not good, and who dares to say that all kinds of famous works are not good? But why are so many works interpreted in so many different ways?

From ancient times to the present, whether it is the Four Books and Five Classics, Tang and Song Dynasty poems, or the Ming and Qing dynasties, all kinds of appreciation and analysis, even those scholars who make a living from it, can they really understand the author's own intentions?

Can't read! I really can't read it.

For example, I saw the poetry appreciation that broke me the most, among which I appreciated Li Bai's sentence "I am a madman in Chu, Fengge laughed at Kongqiu", saying that Li Bai laughed at Confucius, and some people said that Li Bai was disappointed in officialdom and completely drew a line with the dark court.

Baidu, most of them are in this tune.

I really want to call those people big brother, first of all, in the allusion cited by Li Bai, the madman of Chu is not "laughing" at Confucius, people say this: "Feng Xi Feng Xi, the decline of He De." The past cannot be admonished, but the coming can still be chased. Already, already, the current politicians are gone. ”

To explain in the vernacular, the Chu madman shouted loudly: Confucius is great, you are the dragon and phoenix among the people, why did you come to a broken place like Chu to be an official? You are a phoenix burrowing into a puddle of mud, forcing a big fall! The past can't be changed, and now it's too late to rein in the precipice, don't be an official. It's too dangerous for someone to be a good official now, so go back quickly.

Therefore, Chu madman is a supporter of Confucius, and he is not ridiculed or regretted, but admired.

What does Li Bai mean by using this allusion?

The translation of the vernacular is: I, Li Bai, my eyes are above the top, my heart is arrogant, I should be like a madman in Chu, refusing to be an official. I should be as dashing as an immortal. But in fact, my whole life, basically like Confucius, was seeking officials. I hope I can really see like a madman Chu.

To put it bluntly, Li Bai compared himself to Chu madman and Confucius at the same time, and he did not mean to laugh at Confucius at all, but to laugh at himself.

In addition, shouldn't everyone know that poets and lyricists can't write crazy sentences in order to rhyme and pretend to beep?

These two poems are a portrayal of Li Bai's life process: at the beginning, he sought an official like Confucius, and then he kept hitting a wall like Confucius, and finally he felt sorry for himself like the Chu madman who regretted Confucius, and finally hoped that he would let go of the mentality of seeking officials like Confucius, play the world, and become a true immortal.

The difference between the two people is that Confucius did indeed be a high-ranking official with real power.

What both have in common is that they have surpassed themselves in another field and reached the pinnacle of life, that is, self-realization.

The whole poem and Li Bai's whole life are full of regrets and contradictions, and they are not at all related to the dark court.

So, I ...... I'm not comparing myself to Li Bai.

Li Bai and Cao Xueqin can't write words that can be read by people with professional qualities, why do I dare to write such a deep thing into a pure story and let readers understand it?

So, I chose to write in a way that was too explanatory and illustrative.

I suddenly found that the level of online authors throwing the pot is really high!

As for what I'm preaching, I'll explain it in detail after I finish this book.

What can be said now is, what we define, we will get.

What we believe, we will get.

Ahem, get down to business.

By the third volume, Su Ye has completely passed the growth period, and the explanatory content will be reduced, and I will be more restrained in self-expression in the later stage.

Su Ye has excellent thinking, has a clear goal, and has mastered the right method, then, all of this will form a huge motivation to push him forward.

Next, what Su Ye has to do is to work hard and persevere, under the guidance of thinking, in the direction of the goal, using the right method, step by step, and continuous progress.

Actually, there are still some things I want to say, but they don't quite fit, and I will talk about them seriously when the book is finished.

The third volume is officially over.,Today's main writing testimonials.,At the same time, I'm thinking about the plot of the fourth volume and after all day.,So there's no text update today.。

The fourth volume will be opened tomorrow.

Finally, Xiaohuo would like to thank every reader who sees this!

。

Ask for a monthly pass!