After reading this article, I was very moved. www.biquge.info By the way, I felt the need to do something about it, stimulated by some blind pro-Japanese people who couldn't understand history and said that Japan was very good. Don't say anything else, just look at it.

The work is related, please recognize the essence of the Japanese, this is a passionate article written by a patriotic young man at Shandong University

A wedge

In March 1953, Akihito, who had just been made crown prince, visited the United Kingdom at the behest of his father to attend the coronation of Queen Elizabeth. At that time, a poll by the British newspaper Daily Mail showed that 68% of people opposed the Japanese crown prince attending the coronation ceremony. Someone even proposed: "Take the crown prince hostage until Japan pays reparations to the captured British." ”

On October 12, 1971, when Emperor Hirohito and his wife visited Bonn, many German students and Asians living here resolutely staged a large demonstration against the emperor's visit. At that time, German students distributed leaflets with the title "War criminal Hirohito in Bonn". They held up headlines that read, "Hitler slaughtered six million Jews, Hirohito slaughtered fifty million Asians!" Despite the police's stops, the students repeatedly shouted the slogan "Hirohito is a fascist."

Hirohito's visit to the Netherlands in 1971 provoked violent protests after the Japanese invaders occupied the East Indies (present-day Indonesia) during World War II, imprisoned 117,000 Dutch in military concentration camps, and killed 19,000 people.

On August 30, 1974, when the Japanese "East Asian Anti-Japanese Armed Front" learned that Hirohito was going to inspect the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries building, they decided to assassinate Hirohito, but due to poor planning, they mistakenly dropped bombs on the sidewalk, killing 8 people and injuring 165 others. Dadaoji and Yi Yong Liming and others were arrested.

These are just a few examples. From this, it can be seen that the nationalism of foreigners is very strong, and their national character is very fierce; At the same time, they were also very sober and realized that Hirohito was the real culprit of Japan's war during World War II. Although Japan has brought far more disasters and humiliation to China than other countries, it is simply impossible for China to have something like this happen. How should we Chinese feel about this? The Chinese not only changed the culprit of the war in Japan and called him Hideki Tojo, but also completely shifted the responsibility for Japan's war to the Japanese ruling class, without blaming the Japanese people.

China has done everything possible to clear the name of the Japanese people (and, in fact, the Japanese nation). China said: The Japanese people are friendly, kind, peace-loving, and war-resistant; Japan's invasion of China, the massacre of the Chinese people, and the fornication of Chinese women, the responsibility lies with the Japanese ruling class; The Japanese who supported the war were only a minority; The Japanese people have no responsibility for the war because they grew up in Japan's specific social environment and historical environment to develop a belligerent mentality, and thus support and participate in Japan's war of aggression. So, what about the facts?

Second, the Japanese people have the responsibility for the war, and the entire Japanese nation has the responsibility for the war. As we all know, in order to serve Japanese imperialism during World War II, Japanese women were willing to serve Japanese imperialism and let the "imperial army" that slaughtered the Chinese people and strong Chinese women vent their animal desires and strive for happiness in them, "comforting" their boring hearts and boring lives, and at the same time making them more energetic and interesting to slaughter the Chinese people and strengthen Chinese women. Just imagine, in order to support the country's war of aggression, the women of a country are willing to do even the most shameless and inferior things, then the attitude of the people of this country towards this war of aggression is self-evident.

In the spring of 1942, the Chinese Youth Expeditionary Force attacked a bridge on a highway in Burma occupied by the Japanese army. At that time, the Japanese soldiers guarding the bridge told 80 comfort women to evacuate, but they said: "We came to the front line to comfort the soldiers for the sake of loyalty to the country, and we will stick with the soldiers to the end." As a result, they were all killed. Japan's militarism is indeed deeply rooted in the "hearts of the people," and even the comfort women are deeply supportive, and they do not hesitate to sacrifice their lives in order to support Japan's war of aggression. There was no doubt that the Japanese people supported the war.

For many years, the Japanese people did not hesitate to send their cardamom daughters to be comfort women to support the war, while the Chinese subjectively believed that the Japanese people were forced to send their daughters to be comfort women, which is not historically true. Yes, the comfort women were extremely unfortunate now, but at the time they and their parents and brothers considered them honorable. The misfortune suffered by the Japanese comfort women was self-inflicted and did not deserve sympathy.

During World War II, the Japanese government and the Japanese army also warmly welcomed Japanese women as comfort women, making the Japanese army the only army to carry the army* in the modern history of the world. The desolation of the Japanese Imperial Army had reached its peak in the history of the world, and they were not satisfied with humiliating thousands of Chinese women, and they still recruited their own women to sleep with them. As a result, the Japanese comfort women brought a deep humiliation not only to themselves, but also to the Japanese government, army, people, and nation, but this was only discovered later.

At that time, militarism had ruled the whole of Japan, making everything have to serve it. For its sake, shame and morality can and must be discarded. As a result, the Japanese government, the army, the people, and the Japanese women themselves all thought that it was an obligation and an honor for Japanese women to serve as comfort women. If the Japanese people were really against the war, we would not be able to understand the phenomenon of comfort women.

Did the Japanese people have a war responsibility? Let's take our time! At that time, when the war was about to reach the Japanese mainland, an old man in his sixties in Tokyo died on the street because his two sons were on the front line. Long live the Great Japanese Empire! This old man did not express any resentment against the Japanese imperialism that had brought great disaster to his family, but he still supported his country's war of aggression, believing that the loss of his two sons was worthwhile and honorable. He may have had another intention in his heart, that is, to use his death to inspire other Japanese people to fight more courageously, and at the same time not to give up, but also to hope for the final victory of his country. His mood at this time can be described as extremely conflicted. This old man was not a reluctant martyr, as some people think, but, on the contrary, a willing martyr, otherwise why didn't he shout "Down with Japanese imperialism!" Down with the Emperor!" This? As a dying man, you should have the courage to say such a thing.

On August 15, 1945, after Emperor Hirohito announced his surrender, thousands of Tokyo residents came to Niju Bridge, and every family knelt on the ground, facing the Imperial Palace, prostrating their heads and weeping bitterly. Some people committed suicide by caesarean section in anger, and some even killed themselves by the whole family, old and young, to repay the country with death. Tokyo's entire family committed suicide by lying on the rails. After an elementary school in Yokohama heard the emperor's edict of surrender, the principal led a group of elementary school students to commit suicide by throwing themselves into the sea. Why would they do this? Because the war of aggression they fanatically and resolutely supported had been lost, they were desperate and angry, and they did what no other country could match. However, for these things, the Chinese lightly said that they were a minority phenomenon, and that the majority of Japanese welcomed Japan's surrender. I can only agree with the first half of this sentence, not the second half. Yes, relatively speaking, these events are a minority, but they are typical, and they show that the entire nation of Japan (including the Japanese people) is desperate and angry about Japan's surrender. Isn't that so? Is it necessary for all the principals and students of elementary schools in Japan to commit suicide by throwing themselves into the sea, and all the people in Japan committing suicide, in order to prove that the Japanese people support Japan's war of aggression? The appalling events in Japan are clearly typical manifestations of the Japanese people's support for the war, and belong to the Japanese nation as a whole, not to the part that represents only a "minority."

Let's take another look at the Japanese army. When it comes to the Japanese army, the Chinese naturally express strong anger. The Japanese army burned, killed, and plundered in China, and did all kinds of evil, and they were aggressive, crazy, barbaric, cruel and ruthless. Just look at these soldiers (those who came from the Japanese people), and it will be difficult to convince them to say that the Japanese people are good and anti-war. At noon on September 16, 1932, more than 200 Japanese garrisons and gendarmerie surrounded the village of Pingxiangshan, forced more than 3,000 men, women and children of the village to a meadow at the foot of Pingding Mountain, and fired at them with six machine guns. The crowd fell in rows, and in an instant, flesh and blood flew sideways. After a burst of shooting, those murderous demons were afraid that they would not be able to kill them all, and asked Han* to shout in Chinese: "The devil is gone, run wow!" The man who had not been killed in a pool of blood heard the sound, and the machine gun rang out again. Later, the Japanese soldiers inspected the pile of corpses, and when they found those who were still alive, they stabbed them with bayonets, slashed with knives, and beat them with pistols. A Japanese soldier used a bayonet to pick open the belly of a pregnant woman, pricked out the baby, and picked it on the tip of the gun for fun. Look at how barbaric and vicious the Japanese army was, actually "checking the pile of corpses", and actually picking open "the belly of a pregnant woman, pricking out the baby, and picking on the tip of the gun for fun". If the Japanese people were really "kind", then their children would not have behaved so cruelly on the battlefield. Look at the Nanjing Massacre, which claimed the lives of 300,000 innocent Chinese, and what is even more hateful is that in this massacre, at least 1,000 women were brutally killed every day.

In this shameless and unscrupulous act, even the old man and the young girl could not escape its clutches. According to the investigation of the Nanjing Enemy Crime Committee: "...... None of the women who were encountered by the Japanese army, whether they were old women, young girls, or young girls, were exempted...... According to the rough statistics of the international people in charge of the refugee area, there were no less than 80,000 women in the city who were subjected to such humiliation at that time, and after being forced, they were tortured by dissection and abdominal stabbing, and they were bound to die as soon as possible. A female compatriot who had escaped from Nanjing at that time said: "When the enemy first came, as long as she saw a woman, she would pull it, regardless of whether she was old or young, let alone day or night. ”

On December 26, 1937, an 11-year-old girl was killed by a Japanese ship* in Jinling University. Witnesses said that her legs were swollen and covered in blood, and that she had died in a horrific state. According to another eyewitness, the Japanese soldiers were Chinese women: "Sometimes the tits were cut off with bayonets, revealing the white ribs; Sometimes she pierced the lower part with a bayonet and fell on the side of the road, causing her to cry out in pain; Sometimes they were stuffed with sticks, reed pipes, and radishes into the lower part and smashed to death, while the Japanese were clapping and laughing. (The deeds in this paragraph are all quoted from "Why Japan Doesn't Admit Its Debts") The crimes of the Japanese are too numerous to mention, and the quotations in this paragraph are only in case. Here, I would like to ask the Chinese: "If the Japanese people are kind, why are the Japanese troops so cruel and barbaric?" Could it be that the 'kind' Japanese were educated to be like this after joining the army? "I'm afraid not. I am afraid that the Japanese troops do not have such a great ability to turn so many "good" Japanese into groups of demons in an instant. Then it can only be that the Japanese are demons before entering the army (in other words, when they are civilian), and after entering the army, they will be so shameless, barbaric, and murderous.

As Benedict, a famous American female anthropologist, said in her famous book "The Chrysanthemum and the Knife": "It is said that once a conscriptor has received military education, he often becomes a different person, a 'real militaristic statist'." But this change was not due to their education in the theory of the totalitarian state, nor to the indoctrination of loyalty to the emperor...... In Japanese family life, young people who have been brought up in the Japanese style and are extremely sensitive to 'themselves' can easily become barbaric once they fall into such an environment...... This time they become themselves people who are good at torturing others. "We say that the Japanese people are kind, but what is convincing? In a letter to his family on December 16, 1937, Miyamoto, a Japanese soldier who had participated in the Nanjing Massacre, said, "We got the capital of China, and we got the women of the capital; This is a people with no income, 5,000 years of history, and it is of little use to them; There is only hope for the establishment of a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. Seeing this sentence, do those Chinese who think that "the Japanese people are kind and friendly" still have to defend him, saying that he only became a person who despises China and praises "jihad" only after he joined the army?

Finally, let's take a look at how the Japanese people celebrated their victory. After the attack on Pearl Harbor, the whole country of Japan celebrated with enthusiasm. Tokyo, Osaka, Yokohama, Kyoto and Nara celebrate with three consecutive days and three nights. People rushed to tell each other and praise each other, and the whole country was immersed in a sea of celebration. The crowd of people paying homage outside the Imperial Palace Niju Bridge is like a mountain and a sea. The men held plaster flags and shouted, "Long live His Majesty the Emperor!" Even the women, dressed in costumes, came to congratulate and bow deeply to the palace. This is an excellent picture of the Japanese people supporting Japan's war of aggression.

At the end of World War II, the words of a person in the United States vividly illustrated that the Japanese people supported Japan's war of aggression. This man's name is Edwin Layton, and he is a professor who has devoted his life to the study of Japanese psychology. At that time, the United States was going to drop an atomic bomb on Japan, but Admiral Nimitz of the United States at this time was very puzzled, because in his opinion, it was very immoral to drop an atomic bomb, but if the atomic bomb was not dropped, it would be difficult to make the Japanese, who had a strong bushido spirit and Yamato national spirit, surrender, so he asked Professor Edwin Layton. "Your Excellency Shogun, in today's Japan, only the emperor has the right to make the Japanese stop the war, but even for him, the armistice is not an easy matter," the professor said. If he had told all the women in Japan to cut off their hair, or had the people stand upside down and walk with their hands, they would have done so. Even if he ordered all the men to cut off their testicles, ninety-nine percent of them would obey. But ordering the army to lay down their arms is another matter. Nimitz dismissed his hesitation and decided to drop the atomic bomb. The words of the professor illustrate that the authority of the Japanese emperor is enormous, but even he still has difficulty getting the Japanese to surrender. It can be seen that the Japanese are pro-war. Naturally, the Japanese people also supported the war. (Later events proved the professor's words: before Hirohito announced his surrender, he was met with fierce opposition.)

Emil Ludwig, a famous German writer who fled to the United States during World War II, said of World War II in his book The Germans: A Nation with a Double History: "...... But none of these statements touched on the guilt of the German people. "But a deeper investigation of the blame for this world war at home would be directed at the German people. It is futile for the German people to speak of this evil as idle bystanders, or innocents, with their tacit approval for many years. Similarly, the Japanese people are not "idle bystanders" or "innocents." The Japanese people did not acquiesce, but actively embraced and actively participated in Japan's aggression against China and the world. The Chinese, on the other hand, insist on presenting the Japanese people as good, anti-war, and innocent, which can only deceive those who think with their ass.

The crimes committed by Japan during its aggression against China for more than 70 years are hard to describe. They seized Chinese land, extorted war reparations, enslaved the Chinese, looted property, and burned houses; * Whores are spared, from old women to young girls; cut off the woman's breasts, insert the woman's * with a bayonet, dig out the fetus of the pregnant woman; tortured Chinese revolutionary aspirants and shot innocent people; Chinese were buried alive en masse, or their eyes were gouged out, their noses cut out, and vivisected...... Everything has been done to inflict incomparably deep disasters and humiliation on China. The Chinese see it as the culpability of a handful of Japan's ruling class. How can this be convincing? From the emperor to the commoners, from the officers and soldiers to the workers and peasants, from the good women to the military*, from the old to the children, from the intellectuals to the illiterate...... all of them supported Japan's war of aggression; During the more than 70 years of aggression against China, Japanese workers and peasants produced weapons and grain for the Japanese army, and they themselves became the main source of Japanese officers and soldiers, who in turn were the direct executors of the massacre of the Chinese people, and the Japanese people cannot shirk their responsibility for war crimes.

Third, Japan is not a friend of China, and Japan has caused endless disasters and humiliation to China, but China still regards it as a friend. On all propaganda tools such as Chinese radio, newspapers, and magazines, the arguments that "China and Japan are friendly neighbors separated by a strip of water," "the friendly relations between China and Japan go back to ancient times," and "friendly exchanges between China and Japan have existed since ancient times" have been propagated in various forms. However, there is really no friendship between China and Japan. China's view of Japan should be that Japan is our enemy, and it is our number one enemy, and it is by no means our friend.

Japan has benefited the most from China in history, but it has invaded China ungratefully, and China has suffered the most from Japan. In this way, even if Japan was a friend of China before 1872, it was by no means a friend of China after that year. Between 1937 and 1945, Japan invaded China on a massive scale, killing tens of millions of people and humiliating countless women. In this way, China will not only not regard Japan as a friend, but will never regard it as a friend, but on the contrary, it will regard it as an enemy, and it will be the number one enemy. It's easy to understand. It's like if you have a friend who betrays you and kills your parents and robs your property, then even if you die, you will not treat him as a friend, but rather as an enemy and swear revenge.

But China doesn't do that, he still regards Japan as a friend; Moreover, judging from the amount of propaganda, the richness of the form, the profundity of the content, and the length of time, Japan is still China's best friend. This is incomprehensible. Who can believe that this best "friend" is the one who has hurt China the most and deeply. China is like a monastic monk who does not hold grudges against others at all, but knows infinite compassion and infinite tolerance towards all people, both good and evil. Even if anyone despicably lied to him, cut him, insulted him, he would not hesitate to forgive him. China has shown itself to be spineless and particularly dumb in this regard. He regards right and wrong, evil as good, and enemies as friends, erasing the standard of right and wrong, good and evil. It's a country of cowards and fools. In China's eyes, he will never be an enemy; All countries are his friends. She invented a brilliant formula: country = friend. What kind of friendship does China have with the empires (including Japan) that invaded China between 1840 and 1949 and caused China one of the greatest disasters among the world, and now China regards them as friends without exception?

In this world of the jungle, friendship between nations simply does not exist. Yesterday everyone was still talking about friendship, shaking hands with smiles, toasting, and giving speeches, but today they have become enemies, scolding each other and tearing each other apart. The state is 10,000 times more selfish and shameless than people. People sometimes talk about affection and honesty, and they will give up their interests for the sake of friendship, and they dare not act despicably for the sake of face. And the relationship between countries is naked interests, and countries will discard friendship without blushing for the sake of interests. However, these words are only suitable for other countries, not for China. The Chinese tradition of thousands of years is to sacrifice one's life for righteousness, "the gentleman is said to be righteous, and the villain is said to be profitable", righteousness is above all else, and she really takes friendship seriously. It is true that China sincerely regards Japan as a friend, and there is absolutely no pretense in this. Judging by Chinese propaganda, it seems that China is going to treat Japan as a friend forever. There may be a glimmer of hope that China will one day regard Japan as its enemy. But I have to ask, after China has been so ravaged and insulted, it still does not regard it as an enemy, so when will it see it as an enemy?

In fact, China and Japan have never had a friendship. But the Chinese believe that China and Japan are friendly, and they have come up with eloquent evidence: because China and Japan have a history of thousands of years of exchanges. However, you must know that in the past thousands of years, the number of people who have exchanged between China and Japan is less than 1/10,000 of the two countries. In ancient times, when transportation was not developed, and there was little need for exchanges due to the self-sufficient small-scale peasant economy, there was very little exchange between the two countries. As far as the Chinese are concerned, the vast majority of them have never even seen the shadow of the Japanese, let alone communicated with them; And so it is. With so few people communicating, even if friendship arises between them, it cannot be said that there is friendship between the two countries. In fact, the people who communicate with each other in the two countries do not necessarily have friendship, because the exchanges between them are based on material interests. Don't be naïve to think that communication will produce friendship. There is also communication between capitalists and capitalists, but there is no friendship between them, and they are still in a life-and-death competition. Therefore, it is difficult to say that friendship has arisen between China and Japan because of exchanges.

Friendship is a spark generated by the collision of the hearts and minds of the two, but what spark can be seen between China and Japan? The two parties who are friends should be one party in trouble and the other party helps; In the same boat; Respect each other; No one will ever bully anyone; There is even a song of friendship between the two: but none of this can be found between China and Japan.

In the past 70 years or so, Japan invaded China, seized land, extorted compensation, looted property, slaughtered the people, humiliated women, and kneaded China like a ball. The Japanese look down on the Chinese in their hearts, and they think that the Chinese are servile, weak, deceitful, and ignorant. Japan's economy is more developed than China's, and its science and technology are more advanced than China's, which has increased the conceited capital of the Japanese, and they pose as superior to the Chinese. If Japan regards China as a friend, it will not discriminate against China; How can a friend discriminate against a friend? When the Japanese boss scolded his workers, he said, "Don't be as lazy as the Chinese workers!" There are many ways to scold people, so why bother with China? It can be seen that the Japanese have developed the psychological accumulation and psychological habit of discriminating against Chinese, otherwise how could it be so easy for the boss to pull the Chinese workers when they scold the workers? If Japan had regarded China as a friend, such a thing would not have happened.

Why does Japan regard China as a friend? China, on the other hand, regards Japan as a friend, but it is nothing more than a misconception, a forcible pull, and wishful thinking. I really didn't expect that China, which has a long history, understands etiquette, and is respectful, would be so shallow.

The work is related, please recognize the essence of the Japanese, this is a passionate article written by a patriotic young man at Shandong University

A wedge

In March 1953, Akihito, who had just been made crown prince, visited the United Kingdom at the behest of his father to attend the coronation of Queen Elizabeth. At that time, a poll by the British newspaper Daily Mail showed that 68% of people opposed the Japanese crown prince attending the coronation ceremony. Someone even proposed: "Take the crown prince hostage until Japan pays reparations to the captured British." ”

On October 12, 1971, when Emperor Hirohito and his wife visited Bonn, many German students and Asians living here resolutely staged a large demonstration against the emperor's visit. At that time, German students distributed leaflets with the title "War criminal Hirohito in Bonn". They held up headlines that read, "Hitler slaughtered six million Jews, Hirohito slaughtered fifty million Asians!" Despite the police's stops, the students repeatedly shouted the slogan "Hirohito is a fascist."

Hirohito's visit to the Netherlands in 1971 provoked violent protests after the Japanese invaders occupied the East Indies (present-day Indonesia) during World War II, imprisoned 117,000 Dutch in military concentration camps, and killed 19,000 people.

On August 30, 1974, when the Japanese "East Asian Anti-Japanese Armed Front" learned that Hirohito was going to inspect the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries building, they decided to assassinate Hirohito, but due to poor planning, they mistakenly dropped bombs on the sidewalk, killing 8 people and injuring 165 others. Dadaoji and Yi Yong Liming and others were arrested.

These are just a few examples. From this, it can be seen that the nationalism of foreigners is very strong, and their national character is very fierce; At the same time, they were also very sober and realized that Hirohito was the real culprit of Japan's war during World War II. Although Japan has brought far more disasters and humiliation to China than other countries, it is simply impossible for China to have something like this happen. How should we Chinese feel about this? The Chinese not only changed the culprit of the war in Japan and called him Hideki Tojo, but also completely shifted the responsibility for Japan's war to the Japanese ruling class, without blaming the Japanese people.

China has done everything possible to clear the name of the Japanese people (and, in fact, the Japanese nation). China said: The Japanese people are friendly, kind, peace-loving, and war-resistant; Japan's invasion of China, the massacre of the Chinese people, and the fornication of Chinese women, the responsibility lies with the Japanese ruling class; The Japanese who supported the war were only a minority; The Japanese people have no responsibility for the war because they grew up in Japan's specific social environment and historical environment to develop a belligerent mentality, and thus support and participate in Japan's war of aggression. So, what about the facts?

Second, the Japanese people have the responsibility for the war, and the entire Japanese nation has the responsibility for the war. As we all know, in order to serve Japanese imperialism during World War II, Japanese women were willing to serve Japanese imperialism and let the "imperial army" that slaughtered the Chinese people and strong Chinese women vent their animal desires and strive for happiness in them, "comforting" their boring hearts and boring lives, and at the same time making them more energetic and interesting to slaughter the Chinese people and strengthen Chinese women. Just imagine, in order to support the country's war of aggression, the women of a country are willing to do even the most shameless and inferior things, then the attitude of the people of this country towards this war of aggression is self-evident.

In the spring of 1942, the Chinese Youth Expeditionary Force attacked a bridge on a highway in Burma occupied by the Japanese army. At that time, the Japanese soldiers guarding the bridge told 80 comfort women to evacuate, but they said: "We came to the front line to comfort the soldiers for the sake of loyalty to the country, and we will stick with the soldiers to the end." As a result, they were all killed. Japan's militarism is indeed deeply rooted in the "hearts of the people," and even the comfort women are deeply supportive, and they do not hesitate to sacrifice their lives in order to support Japan's war of aggression. There was no doubt that the Japanese people supported the war.

For many years, the Japanese people did not hesitate to send their cardamom daughters to be comfort women to support the war, while the Chinese subjectively believed that the Japanese people were forced to send their daughters to be comfort women, which is not historically true. Yes, the comfort women were extremely unfortunate now, but at the time they and their parents and brothers considered them honorable. The misfortune suffered by the Japanese comfort women was self-inflicted and did not deserve sympathy.

During World War II, the Japanese government and the Japanese army also warmly welcomed Japanese women as comfort women, making the Japanese army the only army to carry the army* in the modern history of the world. The desolation of the Japanese Imperial Army had reached its peak in the history of the world, and they were not satisfied with humiliating thousands of Chinese women, and they still recruited their own women to sleep with them. As a result, the Japanese comfort women brought a deep humiliation not only to themselves, but also to the Japanese government, army, people, and nation, but this was only discovered later.

At that time, militarism had ruled the whole of Japan, making everything have to serve it. For its sake, shame and morality can and must be discarded. As a result, the Japanese government, the army, the people, and the Japanese women themselves all thought that it was an obligation and an honor for Japanese women to serve as comfort women. If the Japanese people were really against the war, we would not be able to understand the phenomenon of comfort women.

Did the Japanese people have a war responsibility? Let's take our time! At that time, when the war was about to reach the Japanese mainland, an old man in his sixties in Tokyo died on the street because his two sons were on the front line. Long live the Great Japanese Empire! This old man did not express any resentment against the Japanese imperialism that had brought great disaster to his family, but he still supported his country's war of aggression, believing that the loss of his two sons was worthwhile and honorable. He may have had another intention in his heart, that is, to use his death to inspire other Japanese people to fight more courageously, and at the same time not to give up, but also to hope for the final victory of his country. His mood at this time can be described as extremely conflicted. This old man was not a reluctant martyr, as some people think, but, on the contrary, a willing martyr, otherwise why didn't he shout "Down with Japanese imperialism!" Down with the Emperor!" This? As a dying man, you should have the courage to say such a thing.

On August 15, 1945, after Emperor Hirohito announced his surrender, thousands of Tokyo residents came to Niju Bridge, and every family knelt on the ground, facing the Imperial Palace, prostrating their heads and weeping bitterly. Some people committed suicide by caesarean section in anger, and some even killed themselves by the whole family, old and young, to repay the country with death. Tokyo's entire family committed suicide by lying on the rails. After an elementary school in Yokohama heard the emperor's edict of surrender, the principal led a group of elementary school students to commit suicide by throwing themselves into the sea. Why would they do this? Because the war of aggression they fanatically and resolutely supported had been lost, they were desperate and angry, and they did what no other country could match. However, for these things, the Chinese lightly said that they were a minority phenomenon, and that the majority of Japanese welcomed Japan's surrender. I can only agree with the first half of this sentence, not the second half. Yes, relatively speaking, these events are a minority, but they are typical, and they show that the entire nation of Japan (including the Japanese people) is desperate and angry about Japan's surrender. Isn't that so? Is it necessary for all the principals and students of elementary schools in Japan to commit suicide by throwing themselves into the sea, and all the people in Japan committing suicide, in order to prove that the Japanese people support Japan's war of aggression? The appalling events in Japan are clearly typical manifestations of the Japanese people's support for the war, and belong to the Japanese nation as a whole, not to the part that represents only a "minority."

Let's take another look at the Japanese army. When it comes to the Japanese army, the Chinese naturally express strong anger. The Japanese army burned, killed, and plundered in China, and did all kinds of evil, and they were aggressive, crazy, barbaric, cruel and ruthless. Just look at these soldiers (those who came from the Japanese people), and it will be difficult to convince them to say that the Japanese people are good and anti-war. At noon on September 16, 1932, more than 200 Japanese garrisons and gendarmerie surrounded the village of Pingxiangshan, forced more than 3,000 men, women and children of the village to a meadow at the foot of Pingding Mountain, and fired at them with six machine guns. The crowd fell in rows, and in an instant, flesh and blood flew sideways. After a burst of shooting, those murderous demons were afraid that they would not be able to kill them all, and asked Han* to shout in Chinese: "The devil is gone, run wow!" The man who had not been killed in a pool of blood heard the sound, and the machine gun rang out again. Later, the Japanese soldiers inspected the pile of corpses, and when they found those who were still alive, they stabbed them with bayonets, slashed with knives, and beat them with pistols. A Japanese soldier used a bayonet to pick open the belly of a pregnant woman, pricked out the baby, and picked it on the tip of the gun for fun. Look at how barbaric and vicious the Japanese army was, actually "checking the pile of corpses", and actually picking open "the belly of a pregnant woman, pricking out the baby, and picking on the tip of the gun for fun". If the Japanese people were really "kind", then their children would not have behaved so cruelly on the battlefield. Look at the Nanjing Massacre, which claimed the lives of 300,000 innocent Chinese, and what is even more hateful is that in this massacre, at least 1,000 women were brutally killed every day.

In this shameless and unscrupulous act, even the old man and the young girl could not escape its clutches. According to the investigation of the Nanjing Enemy Crime Committee: "...... None of the women who were encountered by the Japanese army, whether they were old women, young girls, or young girls, were exempted...... According to the rough statistics of the international people in charge of the refugee area, there were no less than 80,000 women in the city who were subjected to such humiliation at that time, and after being forced, they were tortured by dissection and abdominal stabbing, and they were bound to die as soon as possible. A female compatriot who had escaped from Nanjing at that time said: "When the enemy first came, as long as she saw a woman, she would pull it, regardless of whether she was old or young, let alone day or night. ”

On December 26, 1937, an 11-year-old girl was killed by a Japanese ship* in Jinling University. Witnesses said that her legs were swollen and covered in blood, and that she had died in a horrific state. According to another eyewitness, the Japanese soldiers were Chinese women: "Sometimes the tits were cut off with bayonets, revealing the white ribs; Sometimes she pierced the lower part with a bayonet and fell on the side of the road, causing her to cry out in pain; Sometimes they were stuffed with sticks, reed pipes, and radishes into the lower part and smashed to death, while the Japanese were clapping and laughing. (The deeds in this paragraph are all quoted from "Why Japan Doesn't Admit Its Debts") The crimes of the Japanese are too numerous to mention, and the quotations in this paragraph are only in case. Here, I would like to ask the Chinese: "If the Japanese people are kind, why are the Japanese troops so cruel and barbaric?" Could it be that the 'kind' Japanese were educated to be like this after joining the army? "I'm afraid not. I am afraid that the Japanese troops do not have such a great ability to turn so many "good" Japanese into groups of demons in an instant. Then it can only be that the Japanese are demons before entering the army (in other words, when they are civilian), and after entering the army, they will be so shameless, barbaric, and murderous.

As Benedict, a famous American female anthropologist, said in her famous book "The Chrysanthemum and the Knife": "It is said that once a conscriptor has received military education, he often becomes a different person, a 'real militaristic statist'." But this change was not due to their education in the theory of the totalitarian state, nor to the indoctrination of loyalty to the emperor...... In Japanese family life, young people who have been brought up in the Japanese style and are extremely sensitive to 'themselves' can easily become barbaric once they fall into such an environment...... This time they become themselves people who are good at torturing others. "We say that the Japanese people are kind, but what is convincing? In a letter to his family on December 16, 1937, Miyamoto, a Japanese soldier who had participated in the Nanjing Massacre, said, "We got the capital of China, and we got the women of the capital; This is a people with no income, 5,000 years of history, and it is of little use to them; There is only hope for the establishment of a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. Seeing this sentence, do those Chinese who think that "the Japanese people are kind and friendly" still have to defend him, saying that he only became a person who despises China and praises "jihad" only after he joined the army?

Finally, let's take a look at how the Japanese people celebrated their victory. After the attack on Pearl Harbor, the whole country of Japan celebrated with enthusiasm. Tokyo, Osaka, Yokohama, Kyoto and Nara celebrate with three consecutive days and three nights. People rushed to tell each other and praise each other, and the whole country was immersed in a sea of celebration. The crowd of people paying homage outside the Imperial Palace Niju Bridge is like a mountain and a sea. The men held plaster flags and shouted, "Long live His Majesty the Emperor!" Even the women, dressed in costumes, came to congratulate and bow deeply to the palace. This is an excellent picture of the Japanese people supporting Japan's war of aggression.

At the end of World War II, the words of a person in the United States vividly illustrated that the Japanese people supported Japan's war of aggression. This man's name is Edwin Layton, and he is a professor who has devoted his life to the study of Japanese psychology. At that time, the United States was going to drop an atomic bomb on Japan, but Admiral Nimitz of the United States at this time was very puzzled, because in his opinion, it was very immoral to drop an atomic bomb, but if the atomic bomb was not dropped, it would be difficult to make the Japanese, who had a strong bushido spirit and Yamato national spirit, surrender, so he asked Professor Edwin Layton. "Your Excellency Shogun, in today's Japan, only the emperor has the right to make the Japanese stop the war, but even for him, the armistice is not an easy matter," the professor said. If he had told all the women in Japan to cut off their hair, or had the people stand upside down and walk with their hands, they would have done so. Even if he ordered all the men to cut off their testicles, ninety-nine percent of them would obey. But ordering the army to lay down their arms is another matter. Nimitz dismissed his hesitation and decided to drop the atomic bomb. The words of the professor illustrate that the authority of the Japanese emperor is enormous, but even he still has difficulty getting the Japanese to surrender. It can be seen that the Japanese are pro-war. Naturally, the Japanese people also supported the war. (Later events proved the professor's words: before Hirohito announced his surrender, he was met with fierce opposition.)

Emil Ludwig, a famous German writer who fled to the United States during World War II, said of World War II in his book The Germans: A Nation with a Double History: "...... But none of these statements touched on the guilt of the German people. "But a deeper investigation of the blame for this world war at home would be directed at the German people. It is futile for the German people to speak of this evil as idle bystanders, or innocents, with their tacit approval for many years. Similarly, the Japanese people are not "idle bystanders" or "innocents." The Japanese people did not acquiesce, but actively embraced and actively participated in Japan's aggression against China and the world. The Chinese, on the other hand, insist on presenting the Japanese people as good, anti-war, and innocent, which can only deceive those who think with their ass.

The crimes committed by Japan during its aggression against China for more than 70 years are hard to describe. They seized Chinese land, extorted war reparations, enslaved the Chinese, looted property, and burned houses; * Whores are spared, from old women to young girls; cut off the woman's breasts, insert the woman's * with a bayonet, dig out the fetus of the pregnant woman; tortured Chinese revolutionary aspirants and shot innocent people; Chinese were buried alive en masse, or their eyes were gouged out, their noses cut out, and vivisected...... Everything has been done to inflict incomparably deep disasters and humiliation on China. The Chinese see it as the culpability of a handful of Japan's ruling class. How can this be convincing? From the emperor to the commoners, from the officers and soldiers to the workers and peasants, from the good women to the military*, from the old to the children, from the intellectuals to the illiterate...... all of them supported Japan's war of aggression; During the more than 70 years of aggression against China, Japanese workers and peasants produced weapons and grain for the Japanese army, and they themselves became the main source of Japanese officers and soldiers, who in turn were the direct executors of the massacre of the Chinese people, and the Japanese people cannot shirk their responsibility for war crimes.

Third, Japan is not a friend of China, and Japan has caused endless disasters and humiliation to China, but China still regards it as a friend. On all propaganda tools such as Chinese radio, newspapers, and magazines, the arguments that "China and Japan are friendly neighbors separated by a strip of water," "the friendly relations between China and Japan go back to ancient times," and "friendly exchanges between China and Japan have existed since ancient times" have been propagated in various forms. However, there is really no friendship between China and Japan. China's view of Japan should be that Japan is our enemy, and it is our number one enemy, and it is by no means our friend.

Japan has benefited the most from China in history, but it has invaded China ungratefully, and China has suffered the most from Japan. In this way, even if Japan was a friend of China before 1872, it was by no means a friend of China after that year. Between 1937 and 1945, Japan invaded China on a massive scale, killing tens of millions of people and humiliating countless women. In this way, China will not only not regard Japan as a friend, but will never regard it as a friend, but on the contrary, it will regard it as an enemy, and it will be the number one enemy. It's easy to understand. It's like if you have a friend who betrays you and kills your parents and robs your property, then even if you die, you will not treat him as a friend, but rather as an enemy and swear revenge.

But China doesn't do that, he still regards Japan as a friend; Moreover, judging from the amount of propaganda, the richness of the form, the profundity of the content, and the length of time, Japan is still China's best friend. This is incomprehensible. Who can believe that this best "friend" is the one who has hurt China the most and deeply. China is like a monastic monk who does not hold grudges against others at all, but knows infinite compassion and infinite tolerance towards all people, both good and evil. Even if anyone despicably lied to him, cut him, insulted him, he would not hesitate to forgive him. China has shown itself to be spineless and particularly dumb in this regard. He regards right and wrong, evil as good, and enemies as friends, erasing the standard of right and wrong, good and evil. It's a country of cowards and fools. In China's eyes, he will never be an enemy; All countries are his friends. She invented a brilliant formula: country = friend. What kind of friendship does China have with the empires (including Japan) that invaded China between 1840 and 1949 and caused China one of the greatest disasters among the world, and now China regards them as friends without exception?

In this world of the jungle, friendship between nations simply does not exist. Yesterday everyone was still talking about friendship, shaking hands with smiles, toasting, and giving speeches, but today they have become enemies, scolding each other and tearing each other apart. The state is 10,000 times more selfish and shameless than people. People sometimes talk about affection and honesty, and they will give up their interests for the sake of friendship, and they dare not act despicably for the sake of face. And the relationship between countries is naked interests, and countries will discard friendship without blushing for the sake of interests. However, these words are only suitable for other countries, not for China. The Chinese tradition of thousands of years is to sacrifice one's life for righteousness, "the gentleman is said to be righteous, and the villain is said to be profitable", righteousness is above all else, and she really takes friendship seriously. It is true that China sincerely regards Japan as a friend, and there is absolutely no pretense in this. Judging by Chinese propaganda, it seems that China is going to treat Japan as a friend forever. There may be a glimmer of hope that China will one day regard Japan as its enemy. But I have to ask, after China has been so ravaged and insulted, it still does not regard it as an enemy, so when will it see it as an enemy?

In fact, China and Japan have never had a friendship. But the Chinese believe that China and Japan are friendly, and they have come up with eloquent evidence: because China and Japan have a history of thousands of years of exchanges. However, you must know that in the past thousands of years, the number of people who have exchanged between China and Japan is less than 1/10,000 of the two countries. In ancient times, when transportation was not developed, and there was little need for exchanges due to the self-sufficient small-scale peasant economy, there was very little exchange between the two countries. As far as the Chinese are concerned, the vast majority of them have never even seen the shadow of the Japanese, let alone communicated with them; And so it is. With so few people communicating, even if friendship arises between them, it cannot be said that there is friendship between the two countries. In fact, the people who communicate with each other in the two countries do not necessarily have friendship, because the exchanges between them are based on material interests. Don't be naïve to think that communication will produce friendship. There is also communication between capitalists and capitalists, but there is no friendship between them, and they are still in a life-and-death competition. Therefore, it is difficult to say that friendship has arisen between China and Japan because of exchanges.

Friendship is a spark generated by the collision of the hearts and minds of the two, but what spark can be seen between China and Japan? The two parties who are friends should be one party in trouble and the other party helps; In the same boat; Respect each other; No one will ever bully anyone; There is even a song of friendship between the two: but none of this can be found between China and Japan.

In the past 70 years or so, Japan invaded China, seized land, extorted compensation, looted property, slaughtered the people, humiliated women, and kneaded China like a ball. The Japanese look down on the Chinese in their hearts, and they think that the Chinese are servile, weak, deceitful, and ignorant. Japan's economy is more developed than China's, and its science and technology are more advanced than China's, which has increased the conceited capital of the Japanese, and they pose as superior to the Chinese. If Japan regards China as a friend, it will not discriminate against China; How can a friend discriminate against a friend? When the Japanese boss scolded his workers, he said, "Don't be as lazy as the Chinese workers!" There are many ways to scold people, so why bother with China? It can be seen that the Japanese have developed the psychological accumulation and psychological habit of discriminating against Chinese, otherwise how could it be so easy for the boss to pull the Chinese workers when they scold the workers? If Japan had regarded China as a friend, such a thing would not have happened.

Why does Japan regard China as a friend? China, on the other hand, regards Japan as a friend, but it is nothing more than a misconception, a forcible pull, and wishful thinking. I really didn't expect that China, which has a long history, understands etiquette, and is respectful, would be so shallow.

pass: By the way, the final exam is in progress. So there won't be any new chapters uploaded in the near future. Thank you for your understanding.

;