Retaliation against whistleblowers

Real-name reporting is currently advocated, and more attention is paid to reported cases from the organizational aspect, and the whistleblower can also be protected, and Zhang Dapeng's report to the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, Shandong Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, and Liaocheng City Commission for Discipline Inspection was immediately retaliated against by the defendant as follows: 1. Retaliation against the whistleblower by the defendant village party secretary, village branch committee village director, community, and industrial park: On April 12, 2014, the defendant village party secretary and village director found the whistleblower in a hotel and sent him to Liaocheng to accuse the defendant Hua Daling, deputy director, and cadres of the village committee of seizing the building. garages, old people's houses, and embezzlement, and also sued the two village committees, communities, industrial parks, police stations, criminal police teams, and discipline inspection commissions for inaction. The whistleblower objected to the anarchic chaos caused by the allocation of buildings in Huazhuang, printed the materials on the 13th, and took a taxi to Liaocheng on the 14th to complain. The whistleblower reported to the defendant's branch secretary and village director, and reported to the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, the Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, and the Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection in real name on the 15th, and on the 19th, the inquiry was transferred to the Dongcheng County Commission for Discipline Inspection for handling.

On the morning of April 20, 2014, Hua Kuozhou, the secretary of the party branch, and Hua Daodao, the director, armed with iron rods, led more than 60 people, including the public security special police, the community, and the industrial park organization, to first clear the building occupied by the defendant Hua Daling, and then went to the building where the whistleblower had already paid and the leaders of the industrial park building allocation committee had approved, and smashed and carried Dapeng's son's new furniture to the staircase in a barbaric way, and there was serious retaliation.

2. Because of the historical case of Huazhuang mentioned in the report, the eight joint investigation teams were accused of eating and drinking nearly 2 million yuan. On the 18th, it was transferred to the Dongcheng County Commission for Discipline Inspection for processing. On the 20th, the county magistrate instructed to retaliate against the accuser by force. In addition, the whistleblower had submitted reporting materials to the provincial and municipal supervision groups, and the defendant not only closed the report of the sharp struggle against the four winds and the four winds in order to cover up the problem, cover up the major historical cases, and cover up the crime of embezzlement, so he retaliated against the whistleblower. To sum up, I would like to ask the supervision team to be aware of everything and severely punish the four winds and ** problems. Hope. Accuser: Zhang Dapeng.

April 28, 2014. Query password: tnj6b2t4nxt

The following is a copy of the notification of the results of the online report:

Notification of the results

Respondent: _____________________________________ Received time: 2014-4-15Feedback: The problem you reported has been transferred to the Dongcheng County Commission for Discipline Inspection for processing

The first page, the previous page, the next page, the last page, a total of 1 page, 1 article, the current page is 1

Copyright 1998-2014**Shandong Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Shandong Provincial Department of Supervision

Didn't the organization leaders see the accusations against the Dongcheng County Commission for Discipline Inspection in the materials? Why did they transfer the materials to the defendant unit? The consequences of this?

On May 20, Dapeng went to Jinan to complain to the inspection team of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection in Shandong Province, and the leading comrades stamped and instructed: The Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection Supervision Group will investigate and deal with it.

However, the provincial and municipal supervision team in Dongcheng lived in the county guest house, and they not only transferred the materials to the defendant's industrial park, but also showed the defendant the reporting materials, which led to a second retaliation against the whistleblower. In June, July, and August, Dapeng still made real-name accusations online, however, there has been no feedback and reply so far:

Respondent: The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection in Shandong Inspection Group and Supervision Group.

Received: 2014-8-22.

Reflection content:――

1. On April 15, the whistleblower reported to the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Ministry of Supervision of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection online real-name report on the Dongcheng County Organization ** problem, and inquired on April 18: Shandong Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection: The problem you reported has been transferred to the Dongcheng County Commission for Discipline Inspection for processing. On April 20, he retaliated against the accuser for raiding his home because he transferred the prosecution materials to the defendant's unit. As a result of the report that the Dongcheng County Commission for Discipline Inspection robbed 200,000 yuan from Huazhuang during the handling of the case, the industrial park, the public security bureau, and the procuratorate robbed a total of 1.59 million yuan to cover up the lawsuit. 2. On May 20, the whistleblower reported and complained to the Provincial Supervision Group and the Inspection Group of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, and transferred the reporting materials to the defendant unit and the defendant in the industrial park, which led to a second retaliation.

Appeal: The report materials not only include the eight joint investigation teams of Dongcheng County, eating and drinking 880 yuan per day and robbing villagers of 1.59 million yuan, but also implicate and shield village, county, and city cadres to organize major crimes, which should be investigated in accordance with the law. Responsibility for retaliation against whistleblowers should be severely punished. For details, see the case in the third volume of the novel "Dapeng Eight Parts", "Persistence".

Report on the handling results: -- No reply has been made so far.

The reporter asked, "Is this what is this?"

Dapeng said: "This is only a small part of "Persistence", in my life, for the struggle against **, it is already commonplace to be retaliated against. What's more, it became a real and false military industry in the air force, and suffered 30 years of retaliation for reporting and accusations. ”

The reporter asked, "Aren't you a local?"

Dapeng said: "Yes, 30 years ago, I was a real or false military engineer of the 39602 Qiqihar Aviation School, so coming to the countryside of Shandong is not the second time that the educated youth have gone to the countryside. Listen to me about "Roc at the Military Court". ”