Who are the good people and who are the bad people in this world? Those landlords who hold the land and rent it to others for cultivation must be bad people? Are there several generations of people who have worked hard and accumulated money and finally got rid of poverty and become tenants of landlords? Are the laborers who became technical backbones as workers and eventually became officials, and then embarked on the evil road of corruption?

In ancient times, there were good people who were praised by the people within a radius of hundreds of miles, and in the new society, there were corrupt officials who were spurned by the people. There are outliers who are willing to give away from the landlords and aristocrats, and there are countless scum who are born as workers and scholars but are full of evil! Therefore, it is not entirely correct to divide the good and bad of people according to their constituent classes.

Valshilevsky did nothing bad before the Soviet Red Army divided his family property, his ancestors made a fortune by seafaring, and later bought a family business, but this qiē was robbed of Valshilevsky, a young man who had never oppressed others, and became public property.

Of course, Valsilevsky is now over forty years old, and with the help of German intelligence, he killed 15 people, if not 20, but he is definitely a bad man by normal standards - but the people who robbed him of his property call him comrade, and the people around him call him a good man.

It's just that this good man has not been married until now, and he will be tormented by nightmares until dawn every day. He knew that many of the people he killed were good people who were as innocent as himself, and these people worked hard every day just to have a bite to eat. But he had to carry out his plan to delay production, and he had to send these people who had done nothing bad to Siberia and torture them to death.

We say that Hitler was a devil full of evil, but can we say that the first German soldier to carry out his order to enter the demilitarized zone of the Rhineland was a demon? No, he carried out his orders for the sake of his nation and his country, and he could even be said to be a hero in the face of the great righteousness of safeguarding the sovereignty and integrity of his country.

Before Hitler came to power, in order for Germany to maintain national unity and for the nation to continue to grow strong and prosperous, the ancestors of the German Wehrmacht challenged the "Treaty of Versailles" with their lives -- were they sinners of war? They were accomplices of the devil? So are the people who shed their blood for the nation sinners of war madness?

So when Sickert approached Accardo and asked him to strengthen his country's army for the future of Germany, he was not preparing for a war of aggression, but on the contrary, the goal of his life was to ensure that his country would not be invaded. But Accardo used the money he had saved to occupy France, invade England, and defeat the Soviet Union, and now Germany was bigger than ever, and its influence was larger than it had ever been in the most powerful period in history.

In the eyes of the German people, Accardo, who brought victory to Germany, happiness to the German people, and supreme strength to the whole of Germany, is undoubtedly a hero of the entire nation. His prestige in the hearts of the German people has surpassed that of the emperor and the king, and his position in Germany is even comparable to that of God.

Countless soldiers pressed their palms on the swastika banner and solemnly swore that they would be loyal to Accardo Rudolph for the rest of their lives and give their lives for the Führer. These soldiers raised their hands and offered their blood to their idols and leaders, and their fanaticism was incredible.

Fanaticism, the word is incomprehensible, once a person enters this state, he says that what he does becomes unbelievable, which is why many people in power like to use fanaticism to inspire their people. When people have aroused their own fanaticism, this force can often be devastating.

When you see the Japanese soldiers in World War II running out of ammunition and food, when they are at the end of their ropes, they raise their hands and shout fanatically Long live the emperor, preferring to commit suicide with a grenade than surrender. Do you think these people are simply unreasonable?

When you see German soldiers who are loyal to their Führer just because of an oath, who give their own hands to the state, who go to the battlefield for a decision made by the Führer, and fight to the death until the last moment, does it feel a little illusory and unreal?

When you see a Chinese revolutionary shouting in the face of the enemy's bayonet, facing death with the most calm expression, and still believing that a new world will eventually come and China's future will win at the moment when you close your eyes, do you have to think that this must be a vulgar episode in a TV series?

No, these are real things, when people believe that they are right, they will fight and work hard for it, sometimes this effort is wrong, sometimes it is right, but no matter what, they will try to achieve the results they hope for, to win the goal they want.

If the effort is right and the end result is good, then he becomes a good man, a great man who will be remembered through the ages, and if the effort is wrong and the end result is bad, then this person is what people call a demon and a sinner, a poor man who has been whipped by history.

But is there an absolute distinction between right and wrong in the world? Is there an absolute distinction between good and bad? The Han Wu and Tang Sects, which our Han nation sings praise, are the demonic tyrants that other nations hate to the core. War criminals we spurn ourselves and hold grudges are enshrined in shrines in another country. This is the world, this is a cruel world.

When a powerful country is born, it will face the exclusion and oppression of its rivals, and no one will be willing to give up their vested interests, and no one will be willing to admit the emergence of a new competitor. Soon after the establishment of the Beiyang Fleet, the crumbling Qing Dynasty sailed its fleet to Japan to show off its might, and even a decadent dynasty is still like this, it is not difficult to think about what kind of face the countries in the world have.

Why don't people beat you up? If you do, you're a bad guy or a war criminal? Why doesn't anyone say that Genghis Khan is a war criminal? Why doesn't anyone say that Shunzhi Kangxi is a war criminal? Is Napoleon a war criminal? Is Bismarck an executioner and a demon? To this day, the President of the United States is still fighting here and there -- the key point is why no one has arrested and executed them to comfort the poisoned creatures in the world?

The stupidest thing in the world is to pin the hope of so-called peace on others, only your own strength is the most reliable guarantee, only when you are invincible in the world, can you use your own rules to restrain others, and you have the right to prescribe the way of life of others.

If there are Chinese GIs stationed in Tokyo, if Chinese aircraft carriers are docked in the Persian Gulf, and if Chinese fighter planes often appear in the US air defense identification zone, will anyone still pay homage to the devil's executioner who invaded China? When China is really the world's first, Chinese diplomats can also say to the Japanese with their chins: "Cedion Okinawa, but with or without permission!"

If you look at it from the perspective of justice, Accardo is a wicked man, a heinous war maniac. He and Hitler can be said to be on the same footing, at least in foreign policy, he followed the old path of German aggression and expansion. But this road has been walked by the Chinese, the Americans, the British, the Japanese, the French, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands, everyone has walked, everyone walks is bloody, barbaric, not "civilized" at all.

Accardo also knew that he was not a good man, he knew that there were a large number of sinners who were even more hateful than him working for him, and he also knew how many unsightly things there were in private for the normal operation of the German war machine, and he also knew in his heart that if ten thousand people died all year round in the Polish concentration camps and those collective farms in the eastern region, the German top brass would die thousands of times for what he had done.

But if you think about what Prussia was like when it was beaten by France during the Napoleonic period, and then think about the "Treaty of Versailles" that Prussia later captured the French emperor, and then the "Treaty of Versailles" that Britain and France forced Germany to sign in World War I...... Human civilization is so old that who can tell who is the aggressor and who is the victim in the long years?

Therefore, Accardo is just repeating this cycle of "when is the time for retribution", and repeating what happened thousands of years ago in his own way on the wheel of history. It's just that because of the development and progress of mankind and the advancement of science and technology, this time the war game between human beings is more cruel and bloody, and the means of aggression are more clever and efficient.

So the current German Führer knew his sins and faced them calmly. Anyone who knows a little bit of history knows that even if there has never been a demon king like Hitler in history, even if Accardo stabbed Hitler to death in 1918 and then committed suicide with a knife, there will be an East Teller and North Tler in history, leading Germany on the road of revenge. The world will still have its own catastrophe, humanity will still shed blood and die - nothing will change, that's all.

You know it's wrong, but you have to do it. Knowing that it is a sinful act, he can only continue. This is the sadness of being a group leader, because once the group is formed and the prelude is kicked off, it will not stop because of the change of will of one person. Accardo's decision to replace Hitler is no longer open to any regrets.

The German chariot is already rolling forward, and it will crush anything that stands in its way, including its own driver - unless it reaches the finish line and wins, or crashes into a solid wall and is crushed!