I don't know since when such a perverted topic has been circulating. Pen, fun, pavilion www. biquge。 info

Suppose you have two choices in front of you, the first one, you can save one person, but everyone but this person will die immediately.

The second option, you kill that person, and then everyone will survive.

Strip away the emotional and legal issues, and ask yourself how you would choose.

Perhaps, most people will choose the former one, after all, the whole world is buried with one person, and it's a little scary to think about it.

But, again, this is a wonderful word, if that person is the most important person to you, what would you choose?

If you don't care about emotions and laws, if you analyze them rationally, you should choose the second one, but if you add feelings and laws, in fact, the first one is correct.

This is like a scrapped track, and a normal track, although the adults repeatedly told the bear children not to play on the normal railroad tracks, but the local bear child king still exerted his death instinct, leading more than 100 bear children to play on the normal railroad tracks.

And on the scrapped railroad track, there is a very obedient good boy playing alone with his own business, chatting with the ants who happen to pass by on the ground, talking about the world he fantasizes.

However, the whistle is coming from far and near, and the train is about to pass over the normal tracks, after which more than a hundred living beings will leave this world, although they are innocent of death, but can you bear it?

You have a button in your hand that can change the track of the train, and if you press this button, the hundred children will be able to live, but on the other side, the obedient child, the child who has been abandoned by everyone because he is not social, will lose his own life.

What would you choose?

Don't say that you can shout to let those bear children get out, first of all, you are a stranger, and secondly, you have just been pit out of two front teeth by one of the bear children among these hundred people, and your mouth is still painful.

What would you do in this situation?

Actually, this question is very perverted, because you can only make the right choice by watching those hundred bear children die, then you will only condemn yourself morally, and to put it bluntly, you can get by with your conscience. And once you press the button in your hand, then although you have saved more than 100 people, the child who obviously did nothing wrong died because of you, and what awaits you will be the punishment of the law.

Charged with intentional murder.

If you press the button, you will actually get a double punishment of morality and law, but if you ignore everything, you will only feel bad in your conscience at most, even if it is multiplied by a hundred times, but who knows that you have actually had a chance to save them?

Sure, some people will say that you can stop the train, but, sorry, you just broke your leg.

It's a moral vs. legal vs. moral *100 choice.

In fact, this is also a very good choice question, but when the problem expands, the conditions become more and more numerous, and the problem becomes more and more tricky, the problem will actually be much simpler.

Suppose, the child who squatted alone on the old track was an orphan who was disliked by everyone, although he was very obedient on weekdays, he was hated by everyone, and everyone hated him.

Maybe the question will be much simpler.

First of all, everyone doesn't pay attention to this child, and this child is still a black household in the household register, and the most important thing is that this child is dispensable to everyone.

The question, then, is much simpler, and the choice will be easy if you are sure that there will be no eyewitnesses or onlookers who do not know the truth.

But what if that child happens to be your son?

Imagine killing your own children with your own hands, and a hundred bear children who died because of your ignorance. The former will be known to everyone, and you will be sad and brute, and the infamy of garbage will not be able to raise your head from now on.

You may say that you saved a hundred people, but there are fathers and sons, some are cowardly, some are unreasonable, and some are not at all in the language.

Besides, even if you are trying to save people, who knows that you saved them?

The power of the masses is great, the power of public opinion is terrifying, but a certain person in the know is the most advantageous and the most willing to believe.

"Tell you, my eldest cousin's third aunt and nephew's neighbor's good friend of the eldest brother is working for the country, let me tell you, some time ago, the moral model who was praised by the whole country for saving a hundred bear children was actually a murderer, but the background was hard, so it turned into a commendation. ”

Will you believe such news when it is placed in front of you?

If this news is moistened a little bit, the final result will be a true idea that the parties can't refute.

A hundred sounds like a lot, but there are definitely no more than ten who have come out to testify against you, and besides, there's another term to describe them, 'extras!'.

Just imagine, with no less than Qin Yu's infamy on your back, and then your descendants will be marked, and a little bit of conscience, which one will you choose?

Yes, everyone knows that they will choose the first one.

After all, everyone should understand the truth of self-inflicted, and if you think about it, you can understand which one is the right choice.

First of all, it was a train, and it was a passenger train. If this is to catch up with the Spring Festival, how many people can you think of this train?

Secondly, the abandoned track, then there is a reason for him to be abandoned. At the very least, there are safety risks.

Think about it, if you pull the tracks, it's not just the kid who is playing quietly on the abandoned tracks, but the innocent passengers of a train.

Excuse me, what did they do wrong? They didn't do anything wrong. Perhaps each of them is like an arrow, fantasizing about the taste of home, as if they have smelled the pork rib soup that their mother has been stewing for hours. Perhaps, he has fallen asleep due to the fatigue of the journey, and he has already seen his wife and children in the door. Perhaps, he is just a newborn child, born on the train, but if his life is only a few hours or even ten minutes on this train.

Do you have a guilty conscience?

Which one would you choose now?

Choose to press the switch, and you are carrying not only the life of an innocent child who is sensible, but also the innocent life of an entire train.

Do you have a good conscience? Do you think you can bear the cost of these people's deaths? First of all, once you press the switch, the news will get out on the hundred children you saved, and unless you kill all the children, the news will get out. They were the only witnesses.

But if you kill them, why save them?

If you don't press the switch, the obedient child is safe, and the passengers on the train are also safe.

You didn't do anything, like an innocent passerby standing under a red light and waiting for a green light at the time of a car accident.

To that child, you are just an unseen, ghost-like being, so you don't have to be burdened with anything but that little condemnation of your conscience.

So, what choice would you make?