It's a small talk, and you can take a look at it if you want to.

First court: The U.S. court organization is divided into two major systems, federal courts and state courts, which apply their own constitutions and laws, and have jurisdiction over different cases and territories, and the federal court system consists of district courts, appellate courts, and the Supreme Court

The state court system is highly unified, generally consisting of the state courts of first instance, the state appellate courts, and the state supreme courts.

Second Judges: Judges are subject to a non-replaceable system, a full-time system, a high salary system, and a retirement system.

Judges should be completely neutral and objective, and judges should not be involved in the fight against crime, but should maintain a neutral attitude towards the prosecution and the defence.

Third Prosecutors: Federal Prosecutors, State Prosecutors, and County Prosecutors, most of whom are elected, not admitted.

The vast majority of cases in the United States are prosecuted by county prosecutors, who are not accountable to anyone.

District prosecutors in the United States have a lot of power, they are all lawyers, elected, of course, after losing the election, they may still go back to be lawyers, and many times it will be found that the lawyers and prosecutors of the prosecution and defense in the court are classmates, teachers and students, or former superiors and subordinates or partners, which is very conducive to reaching a 'prosecution and defense deal', so the connections of lawyers are very important.

……

The Fifth Amendment to the Federal Constitution stipulates that no one may suffer harm to life or bodily twice for the same offence, which is known as the principle of double jeopardy, whereby a prosecutor cannot prosecute a criminal suspect twice for the same offence.

For example, if someone commits a crime, if they are tried in place A and may be convicted of a felony, then they can be transferred to county B, because of the unspeakable relationship with the district attorney and judge, they can be given a very light sentence, and after the judgment, other places cannot be prosecuted for this crime.

A typical example is the 'King of Chicago' Capone, the Valentine's Day massacre attracted national attention, and was finally forced to surrender by the national gangsters, but at the same time, he also reached an agreement with a local prosecutor, and finally only sentenced to one year......

The other is Michael Jackson, who has been entangled in the sex immersion case for many years because of the district attorney's crazy bite.

……

We are all judicial organs, but in the United States, only the courts are judicial organs.

Of course, this is true in theory, but the law of the sea system has developed for many years, and there are all kinds of restrictions on this aspect, which is already very fair, after all, it is the jury that determines whether or not guilty is guilty.

Also, let's talk about prosecutors and the U.S. police.

In the United States, where there is a strong focus on human rights, the rights of the police are greatly restricted.

To illustrate, let's say, reconnaissance.

The police may carry out a number of investigative methods without the consent of the judge and prosecutor, which are the most basic and have little impact on the rights of citizens.

For example, if an ordinary witness does not raise suspicion of a crime himself, the police can question him himself. Collecting some evidence, in addition to searching and requesting special documents, the police are not too restricted.

However, many investigative techniques involve civil rights, especially the right to privacy, and the police cannot make their own decisions, and must obtain the approval of a judge before they can take action.

For example, the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution mentions early on that searches must be approved by a court. The police must contact the Public Prosecutor's Office to help him apply for the judge's approval for a search, and the Constitution provides that citizens have the right not to be subjected to unreasonable searches.

For example, in the case of Simpson who killed his wife, he was indeed the murderer, and the whole United States knew about it, but the evidence obtained by the police was found by the defense's fantasy lawyer team and did not obtain a search warrant, so the evidence was invalidated.

Of course, this 'unreasonable search' is more legally flexible, and it all depends on whether your lawyer team is good enough.

For example, eavesdropping, which is considered by us in law to be one of the most powerful means of reconnaissance for civil rights, a citizen does not know that government officials are eavesdropping on his conversations, which has a very big impact on his right to privacy.

The conditions for wiretapping are simply that there is a lot of evidence that there is likely to be a conversation related to the crime in that place or on that phone when other investigative methods are ineffective, and that wiretapping can only be used when a more important crime exists.

Finally, if the prosecutor feels that all the conditions are met, he must obtain the approval of the headquarters of the United States Department of Justice before he can apply for the judge's approval, and only after the judge's approval can he conduct wiretapping.

Others include access to bank accounts, etc...... The supervision and constraints received by the police are very large.

In this book, as long as Sean gets the district attorney, then the basic police will have no way to deal with Sean.

For example, when the district prosecutor is elected, he will make a big effort to push his own people up~

……

Finally, let's talk about juries, divided into large and small juries, small juries are sentenced to one year, and grand juries are all felons for more than one year.

Generally speaking, the law in the United States is already the most complicated and fair, and it is fair and open to all people, whether you are the president or the people, of course, you can't afford to hire a good lawyer, that is your own problem, and it has nothing to do with the law itself.

There is a kind of lawyer and prosecutor in the United States who like to stare at large companies very much, and they specialize in biting large companies, and the fame and fortune they can get once they win the case are beyond imagination, so it is not simply rich and powerful, after all, the scope of radiation of any person and company is limited.

What's more, there is also the Donkey Party, the Elephant Party, and competitors.

……

Okay, just casually, I also have seven tricks and six tricks, and it's a bit messy.

The question is, what do I do with a stinky code to study legal loopholes???