Zhao Bixia also realized that it was King Qi who came to the school palace to ask about politics. It is precisely because of the king's courtesy and virtuous corporal who employs people with virtue that the plane here sees the king of Qi respectfully saluting.

The students of the Jixia School Palace also often seek shortages for the Qi country, or needle the disadvantages of the times, and satirize the monarchs and ministers. Among them, there are many arrogant and disrespectful words, but the king of Qi does not blame him.

Zhao Bixia watched the academic debate in the Jixia School Palace and enjoyed the cultural feast. And here Qu Yuan is still following Chen Ping in Lantai to sort out the more insightful remarks of the students in the class, and edit them into a book.

After so many days of running-in, Qu Yuan has basically adapted to the rhythm and style of Lantai's learning.

After Mr. Leator left that day, Chen Xiang, Xiong Huai, Qu Yuan, Jin Shang, and Tang Mo remained in front of their respective cases to think about what Mr. said.

So several people started a heated argument. The gentleman has left, and everyone is still unsatisfied

In the lecture, he mentioned one point: about the ruthlessness of the law and the sentient nature of the law

As a result, all the students have different views, and the same ideas are naturally in the same camp.

The concept of Chen Xiang analysis: "What is law? Law is the embodiment of the will of the ruling class, and it is a code of conduct that stipulates rights and obligations, maintains the order of the people in the world, and guarantees the implementation of the coercive power of each country.

In response to the second "love", Chen Xiang analyzed it again, and he frowned slightly and said: "What is love? Feelings, that is, human feelings, refer to subjective feelings, including both individual subjective feelings and physical subjective feelings, but both of them are beneficial, arbitrary and subject differences from the individual itself.

After a series of explanations, Chen Xiang finally threw out his own point of view and said confidently: "What is the law that does not tolerate mercy? What we need to emphasize is that tolerance here is tolerance, and tolerance is not tolerance, and accommodating the fact that the Fa cannot tolerate the interference of human feelings does not mean that the Fa is cold, but on the contrary, our Fa has temperature. It is not difficult to see from the protection of the drunken body by the law, the encouragement of reform, and the tolerance to a certain extent that the law is full of human care, but whether the law allows feelings to interfere with it is by no means whether there is love in the law! Of course, the law has feelings! But it will never tolerate emotional interference.

Qu Yuan and Zhao Sui also supported Chen's view. Qu Yuan continued to explain: "First, to protect the authority and role of the law, the law cannot tolerate the current situation of various countries, we find that some people when facing the law first think of not to comply but to question and challenge from the main feeling, it is true that the law has been on the road, and there will inevitably exist and unsatisfactory places, but we can't just because there is a problem with the law to allow these people to show the law from the law to the law, and the algorithm is not perfect, that is also the rule we have to abide by. We must ensure its rights and ensure that it is not disturbed by circumstances, so that it can play a better role, and blindly using the law of subjective influence is precisely contrary to the original intention of the law, and only by first abiding by the law can we further seek to improve the law, and we must not undermine the authority and role of the law with a posture of disobedience and resistance

Zhao Sui nodded, and then narrowed his eyes and said: "Second, to ensure the fairness and order of the people of all countries, the law cannot tolerate the law itself to be objective, compulsory, compulsory and fair, so that it can and has always protected the fair order, and on the other hand, it is only a subjective and unacceptable feeling, if the situation is allowed to interfere with the law, the uncontrollable subjective feeling will make the law extremely chaotic, so that the law that should be used as a rope will become strange, and the fairness guaranteed by the law instinct has been jeopardized. The order that should be maintained has been challenged, not to mention, if the law is applied with affection, it is inevitable that the law will be sought for profit, and the sentence "there is someone behind the back" hides a lot of trust behind the back door, and the phenomenon of wantonly challenging and even trampling on the law under the pretext of human affection.

The opposing parties Tang Wu, Zhao Yu, and Jin Shang discussed, and after a while, they recommended Jin Shang to come out to refute.

Jin Shang said: "This "love" is on the word. The two words "love" are different, the "love" of the law does not tolerate the feelings, and the "feelings" of the law also tolerates the feelings of the people, which refers to the public feelings, and also refers to the feelings of the public, that is, the law tolerates the public feelings and does not tolerate personal private feelings. The law allows public sentiment to mean that the law is the embodiment of the will of the public, and this public sentiment and public will have been taken into account when legislating. Therefore, the public sentiment has been incorporated into the laws that have been promulgated and implemented. But why is the law unforgiving in the process of implementation? It turns out that this is a personal private relationship that deviates from the will of the public, and a personal private relationship that deviates from the will of the public, and of course the law cannot tolerate it, otherwise it will not be impartial law enforcement, but perverting the law for personal gain. Therefore, in the process of implementing the law, it should show its public will and its iron-faced selflessness. Any word "private" here will be crushed by the chariot of the law. Some people may say that his personal wishes are consistent with the Fa, and the Fa is accommodated. Then I think that your personal will is in line with the will of the public, and this situation is also a public feeling, and the law has already allowed it in advance. ”

In other words, perhaps there is an unreasonable phenomenon of people in various countries today interfering with the law, but this does not mean that the law is not intolerable, on the contrary, it is precisely because of this that we should adhere to the law and not tolerate it, based on the present, according to the law, the country according to the law, and the people of all countries should learn to use the law to solve problems, rather than questioning the law after there is a problem." We should not allow the theory of control of the law, but should exclude the interference of the theory from the law. This is because only in this way will our Fa be more complete and the people of our countries will be better. ”

Zhao Yu echoed the smile, and then agreed with Jin Shang and Tang Wu's views, he said: "The essence of law lies in the eternal, universal, and effective principles of justice and moral axioms. And love refers to the love of the public, the love of heaven and earth. Affection arises and develops in the practice of people in all countries and in the process of understanding and transforming the world. The law is determined by people, and it is inevitable that it is mixed with human feelings, and the content of the law conforms to the general psychology of the people of all countries, and people are protected from unjust encroachment under the protection of the law. Therefore, the law we have formulated is sentient, and the root of the law is fairness and justice. His heart is for every citizen, he treats everyone equally, and his justice and fairness are fraternity, which protects every citizen from the greatest extent, which is the most ironclad evidence of the law's affection. ”

(Because there are many Legalist classics, but I can't find relevant historical deeds, I draw on some professional debates in the Department of Law here)