Game review media, as the name suggests, is what gives a rating to games.

However, this scoring is not simple.

Unlike the ratings between players, the ratings of the media will more or less affect the sales and word-of-mouth of the game.

Once a game is given a high score, then in addition to its own excellent quality, the next few days are preparing for the prize. Because sales are sure to be high!

And if a game is given a low score, in addition to being really out of the public because of the poor quality, most of the sales will not meet the publisher's expectations.

Therefore, when this kind of scoring behavior can gradually affect the market and sales, the transaction of money will breed from this.

Do you want to score your game badly?

It doesn't matter, the money is in place, I'll give you high marks, black and red are also red.

Do you want to score the game well?

You know what I mean? (rubbing fingertips)

What? You don't understand?

I'm sorry, you can't play this game.

Do you want to score your game?

Do you know the rules? (crazy hints)

What? Don't have enough money?

I'll give you a low score first, and we'll make up a reason to change the high score when the money is in place.

Don't worry, don't worry about no one buying, there are many players, and there are many wrongs.

...

As a result, there have been many cases in the history of games where good games have been given low scores, or low scores have been changed to high scores in the middle of games.

As for bad games with high scores, it's rare.

Obviously, they have to be embarrassed by the media.

Or, act, don't be so obvious.

Then, when this industry was born, media organizations began to pop up one by one.

Make money, don't stumble.

As a result, the number of review agencies is as high as it is in the world.

But if you classify it by 'professional' and 'authoritative', it will be so much that it will become a small thing.

And this part is almost all foreign evaluation agencies.

There is only one in China, and it is still in the form of self-media, and its status is in the range of 'many as cows'.

Therefore, no matter how objective and professional this self-media evaluation agency is.

It's not enough for players to have a reference.

The world's largest and most trafficked America evaluation agency CA is the primary reference object for the player group.

Of course, that was once.

The current CA is not so professional.

Because they have repeatedly overturned in recent years.

There were even two industry jokes about 'interns scoring incorrectly'.

In fact, everyone understands that the so-called intern scoring is just an excuse.

The real situation is that the money is not in place and it is given a low score.

However, even if it is a joke, CA still relies on its qualifications and connections to firmly sit on the world's number one authoritative throne, and its position has not been shaken so far.

Even if players gradually stop using their ratings as a reference, it doesn't hurt them.

Business, as long as you have money.

Players don't care, can you make me money?

Therefore, with the increasing number of CA rollover incidents (not enough money), the phrase 'CA is a joke' has been widely circulated in the domestic player circle.

But now, for the game "Containment Breach", players are still looking forward to what the major media will think.

After all, they are still very concerned about this domestic game that has gone global.

After all, the previous "Mountain in the Sky" has already achieved a bumper harvest of word-of-mouth sales.

So who is rated higher for Containment Breach compared to the previous game?

As a result, the Fourth Natural Disaster Club, which is the pioneer of game information, has already posted reviews from major media organizations that night so that players can see it at a glance.

First of all, the CA who will never be absent, they gave "Containment Breach" a hit... 5.9 points?

Ale?

How to Fat Four!?

None of the 6 points?

"Sky Mountain" scored a high score of 9.8 before!

Why is there only a 5.9 score in "Containment Breach" this time?

While the players were stunned, they hurriedly looked at the specific evaluation content.

Merit:

+ The picture quality is very cutting-edge

+ Nerve-wracking atmosphere at all times

+ Ultra-high and incredible degrees of freedom

+ The performance of the characters is wonderful

Shortcoming:

- The AI of the monster is a headache

- The map is too wide and not very exploratory

- The presence of the weapon did not show its importance

- Random events are frequent and tiresome

- The stealth element is greater than the survival factor

- Easy to get lost

Rating: 5.9

(General)

Ah, this...

No way?

The only game that overturned?

Is the game crashing?

NO！

Unbelieving players scrolled their movers and looked down at CA's comments.

Sure enough, below the rating, there are also long-word reviews.

To put it simply, this means:

The game was well done, but I was tired from playing.

The monster AI is too high, and the whole game is exhausting.

The atmosphere is well rendered, and the entertainment experience is boring.

The roads lead in all directions, and the exploration makes people sick to their stomachs.

There are many different types of guns, and they all have the same effect.

It was originally a survival game, but the only way to do it turned out to be.

The plot is jerky and obscure, and the experience is too desperate.

The essence of the game deviates, and feelings should be valued!

Uproar——!

I can't imagine that CA actually commented like this, and the game really collapsed?

Or is it the only game publisher Unlimited Internet Entertainment that doesn't give enough money?

Wait a minute!

Will the game really break down?

Because this time the production team's trailer is a CG trailer, not a real machine trailer, will it really collapse and be embarrassed to release it?

But it shouldn't be...

They made a development team like "Sky Mountain" to dominate the horror market, how could they overturn in "Containment Breach"?

Isn't it management chaos?

Or is the development process blocked?

In short, some players who weren't sure about it immediately rolled the wheel and looked to the next media review.

As a result, this directly deprived the players.

The second organization is JM, which is as famous as CA, but has a lower flow rate.

They once gave "Mountains in the Sky" a high score of 9.7.

Now for "Containment Breach"... 10 points?

Yes?

Am I right?

The players in front of the screen immediately rubbed their eyes and looked at it again.

That's right, 10 points!

JM, who is on the same level as CA, actually gave "Containment Breach" a perfect score of 10!

In other words, this is actually a masterpiece!

Players immediately scroll down to see JM's detailed review.

Merit:

+

The VR graphics are so real that you feel like you're there

+ Very modern industrial sci-fi scene design

+ Pick up anything you see

+ The monster's AI logic is unimaginably smart

+ The map is detailed and exploratory

+ Very eye-catching random events

+ Perfect and realistic character storytelling

+ The presence of firearms is not strong, which reflects the importance of survival

+ Radar maps are useful, it's not easy to get lost

+ Stealth mechanics make the game even more terrifying

+ The music style is very appropriate and can touch people's hearts

Shortcoming:

-The ability of the wandering monster is unknown, and it is easy to die when first encountered

- The introductory documents in the control room seem to be somewhat professional and esoteric, and not easy to remember

- The recipe for the synthesis of a certain mechanical device is confusing and does not go into details

- There are too many key cards

- The backpack capacity is too small

Rating: 10

(Masterpiece)

Brief Comments:

'It's by far the most shocking horror game I've ever played. ’

'I've never seen a game that can get me so addicted that I forget about my job. ’

Although the game has some shortcomings, it doesn't hurt, it's just not as convenient. Compared to its advantages, it is completely negligible! ’

The mechanics of the game are also very complete, which shows that the developer has a lot of experience in making games. ’

In terms of gameplay, I felt as if I was really in the game world, and I was so fascinated by the real environment that I even forgot about it after work. ’

The game was moderately difficult and didn't make me feel much hopeless. Monsters have ways to deal with them, they just have to find out for themselves. ’

Like I said, it's a masterpiece that I'll never forget! It's not too much to give it a perfect score! ’

Ah, this...

Players don't get it.

Who is telling the truth?

Why does the disadvantage of CA become an advantage when it comes to JM?

Especially the AI of monsters.

The former says it's a headache, and the latter says it's unimaginably smart.

So what does that mean?

What the hell is a monster?

Players don't know, but to be honest, players have different opinions about the shortcomings mentioned by CA.

It was originally a horror game, focusing on the fear of the unknown, the depression of the atmosphere, and the rendering of the environment.

Your whole gun, and you still make the gun so awesome, is that still a horror game?

So it makes sense that the power of firearms will become weaker.

Also, how did the random events that people talk about in "Sky Mountain" become 'tiresome' on the CA side?

Could it be that the random events in Containment Breach are not as interesting and rich as in Sky Mountain?

Not to mention stealth, many players rely on stealth to hide from monsters in horror games.

Without stealth, it means that life is not guaranteed!

As for the question of getting lost...

It can only be said that the benevolent see the benevolent!

So, under these two polarized ratings, players continued to look at the ratings of other companies.

PO: 9.8 points

Comments: The game gives the common saving/reading settings the meaning of 'justifiable', which adds a lot of substitution when playing.

KL: 9.6 points

Comments: Very interesting random events, people will not get bored, the setting of the monster also reflects the developer's ideas and creativity, and the plot is very good.

UC: 9.4 points

GA: 9.2 points

SB: Score not out.

...

...

Got it.

The players finally got it.

In the media applause, only CA Maverick gave a low score.

Then the meaning is already obvious.

Just two reasons.

1. The money is not in place.

2. The evaluator is also an 'intern'.

It's like using 'temporary workers' to apologize for the crime after something happens in China, which is purely an excuse.

But CA, as an 'authoritative' and 'professional' media evaluation agency, is it so 'obvious' shameless?

Will it be a few days before the score will be changed again because 'the money is in place'?

Players couldn't guess, so they went to the Internet to dig deep into the CA evaluators who reviewed "Containment Breach".

Then I found that he had been condemned and complained by overseas players on the Internet.

After a detailed understanding, it was found that this CA evaluator.

It's a person who mainly plays FPS cool games.。

He gave "Battlefield Gunsmoke", an FPS fast food game that is one a year and has a high score of more than 9.5...

The players were stunned.

This is an irresponsible review!

So, under the YouTube evaluation video, they followed the overseas players to denounce this CA evaluator who scored randomly!

------Off topic------

I'm tonight... Something... I wish you all a happy Chinese Valentine's Day!

Book Reading House