When I first wrote about this character, I knew there would be controversy, because some of the foreshadowing hadn't been unfolded yet, and even if I had hinted at it, some things still didn't seem to make sense.

Originally, my plan was not to respond, but after the plot unfolds, everything I don't understand will suddenly become clear.

It's just that I've recently found that there are so many controversies that I didn't expect, and of course, it may also be that after the recommendation, there will be more people and more voices (first, it's my problem).

There are two main points of contention at the moment.

"Why does Lin Yin think that the protagonist will wait for him in the same place, and why does he define the protagonist as private property."

"Why doesn't the protagonist hold a grudge when he is threatened, so cowardly?"

First of all, I have mentioned many times in a vague way that the night in the world is very dangerous.

It is not necessarily safe during the day, and other forces are watching this area.

The protagonist is really able to deal with it, because he has a lot of experience in the game and can find ways to avoid possible dangers.

But people in the world don't know, and that's the advantage of poor information.

So subconsciously, they think that if the protagonist is clever, he will not leave his birth point without authorization, and it is the best choice to survive.

At this point, the first half of the first question is explained.

In addition, why does Lin Yin define the protagonist as private property.

I won't admit that this is my problem, because I didn't write that Lin Yin defined the protagonist as private property.

Here is the original text:

"After that, the construction of the main city of 007 is to be completely centered around this native, and I will convince him to join our studio." 」

Excerpt from "10, Lin Yin"

Pay attention to the keywords.

I would convince him to join our studio.

And then there's the second question.

How the protagonist doesn't hold grudges, and why doesn't he react when he is threatened.

(Again, I didn't handle it well.) ）

Here is the original text:

"Mines are naturally dangerous, but they are also more abundant in terms of resources and minerals.

What he needs at the moment is efficiency, and the most important thing is to strengthen his combat power as soon as possible."

Excerpt from "11, Charcoal in the Snow"

Second, the protagonist is cowardly.

Chen Che's choice to stay at the birthplace to develop infrastructure has already explained a lot of problems.

The word hard should be more powerful to make than to say it.

In fact, at this point, the controversy has been almost explained, but I still have to say a few more words.

On these two questions, there is no doubt that the pot is in me.

Brothers should be able to feel that these questions have answers in the original text, but they have been put in an inconspicuous place by me.

Why is there a controversy, and some people even think that this is a poisonous point?

Personally, I think so, my creator perspective is too much of an influence.

The information that the reader receives is limited, and some important hints that affect the character should not be brushed aside.

I have summed up my experience and will try to avoid it again next time.

Here I would like to thank two readers, whose IDs are "Lin Cup is a cat" and "Common Consciousness".

(In no particular order, the same level of gratitude)

"Shared Consciousness" raises this question and makes me realize that this plot would be handled in a better way.

"Lin Cup is a cat" helped me explain a lot, I have been writing online articles for a few years, and I have been a street fighter for a few years, and it is the first time that a reader has helped me explain, I am very moved.

I've revised the original text to expand these hints, and the main changes are in chapters 10 and 11, and interested brothers can go and catch insects.

Finally, thank you for your constructive comments, I have benefited a lot.

By the way, a digression.

I deleted a buddy's post today, because he didn't say anything, so he posted a sentence "How can the current author love to write about these poisonous points".

Neither for the author nor for the readers, there is no nutrition, I weighed it again and again and chose to delete the post.

Ask for a wave of forgiveness, hope for understanding.