PS: I took a look back at the previous chapter on philosophical theories where the spray points were more concentrated, and clarified a few words.

The main point of spraying points is that I have put the dead country on the top of "usurping and usurping too much", and also said that "the death of the country is a very complicated issue, and there are various reasons for land annexation and family to become bigger", and said that I "ignored so many reasons, only used a simple reason, and tried to arrogantly conquer the world".

I want to say, let's take a look before spraying, the protagonist's words are to Emperor Longwu, just for whether to usurp and the harm of usurping. The protagonist doesn't argue for the grand question of "why did the dynasty die?"

So, I think I can spray, but at least refute what I've said, and don't just drag my argument one step further and fabricate a void to spray the enemy.

Of course, I know that the fall of a dynasty is very complicated, and the rise and fall of history is very complicated.

What I'm talking about is just that there are more usurpers, and it is easy to reduce the "tolerance of the dynasty to perish", and as for what the direct cause is, I haven't touched on it at all.

For example, if I say "people who are divorced more likely to divorce", it does not mean that "more divorces are the reason for the next divorce".

The direct cause of divorce is, of course, the disharmony of the husband and wife's life, poverty, violence, and incompatible personalities...... And so on and so forth,

The first love may be able to endure until the other party can't even afford to eat, and then consider breaking up.

The seventh marriage may just be divided if the other party can't afford to buy a house in the city center.

The first love may not leave until the other party is injured.

The seventh marriage may just be the first time the other party slaps him/her and is about to leave.

The first love may not leave until the other party is completely dysfunctional.

The seventh marriage may just be that the other party lasts less than 20 minutes, and they can't bear it.

If you want to talk about the direct reasons for the specific divorce, of course, it is very complicated, and all of the above reasons are possible. But there are more divorces and divorces, and what is reduced is the psychological threshold resistance, which is a high probability (of course, I do not rule out that some people who have been divorced seven times are still chaste and fierce men/women, and treat the seven marriage partners as first love.) Because these are cases, they cannot be compared with dynasties)

I accept all rebuttals to what I have said, but I do not accept the Void Woo Enemy.

In addition, the above remarks are only theoretical explanations, which are factual judgments, and try not to attach value judgments, that is, I did not belittle "low tolerance", nor did I say that high tolerance is good.

Modern society has multiple values, if some people are uninhibited by nature and love freedom, can't rub sand in their eyes, even if it is their first love, they still choose zero tolerance, and they will sue for domestic violence and divorce if they are beaten, I also support it.

If some people think that an ancient dynasty should perish immediately as long as it starves its people, why should the people be more patient and give it a chance, and think that it is not a good thing to be able to endure, then I also understand this kind of thinking.

This is because the method of "preventing us from entering the vicious circle of usurpation" is indeed not a way to cure the root cause, but only to make the careerists and the leaders of the peasant army from the top to the leaders of the peasant army more afraid before making the decision to rebel, so that they can "endure" more.

As for whether or not we can reform after enduring it and treat the symptoms and cure the root cause, this is not a question to be solved by the legitimacy and orthodoxy of the rule in the first place.

The purpose of orthodoxy is to regulate the endurance of all parties, not to solve the problem of perdition itself.