The kicker, here.

……

Wang Hao arrived at the airport in the afternoon the day before he made the report, and then he was taken to the spectrometer detection experimental center.

Come a day in advance, also because the report takes a long time.

This is an S-level difficulty data analysis study, it took nearly 20 days to complete the analysis process, the difficulty is naturally extremely high, and the report will be divided into two parts: data analysis and mathematical analysis.

The data analysis part is to use computer means to analyze the basic data and obtain some numerical values.

Mathematical analysis is the analysis of the results obtained by computer means.

The first part is easier to understand, but the later part is more difficult.

The report will be conducted in the morning and afternoon.

The people in the spectrometer detection experimental center have been waiting for a long time, most of them are not to welcome Wang Hao, many people are even a little resistant, especially the specially invited judges from abroad, including Gessner Rainier, Alex Bron, and the members of the experimental team with them, and it is not an exaggeration to say that they are hostile to Wang Hao.

Because most people resisted, it felt like a lot of people came to greet them.

At the entrance of the spectrometer detection experimental center, there were more than 20 people, half of whom were foreigners.

Seeing this grand scene, Wang Hao's heart was moved.

So many people came to greet me?

What a passion!

The last time I went to the Institute of Aeronautical Materials to make a report, there were less than 20 people at the door, and they only came to shake hands sporadically.

Now there are more than 20 or nearly 30 people.

As soon as he got out of the car, a group of people came over collectively.

Several people came over to greet and shake hands, but the scene seemed a little weird, a few foreigners shook hands, but their expressions looked cold.

Zhang Yifang helped to make introductions, "Gessner-Rainier, the leader of the European particle collision CP destruction experiment team. ”

Alex Bron, Professor, University of Chicago, Fermilab, HyperCP Experimental Program Leader.

These two are not well-known internationally, but the institutions engaged in R&D are too famous.

The European Particle Collider (EPC) is the largest international cooperation project, with dozens of countries and teams participating, and thousands of physicists, mathematicians, and computer engineers working for it.

Fermilab, the full name of Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, named after Enrique Fermi, winner of the 1938 Nobel Prize in Physics, is one of Amriken's most important physics research centers.

Fermilab is best known for its Tevatron proton/antiproton accelerator, the world's second-highest energy output particle accelerator, which can accelerate protons to nearly the speed of light.

At Fermilab, it's obviously unusual to be the person in charge of a big project.

A group of people walked into the building.

Zhang Yifang walked next to Wang Hao, on the other side was Alex Brohn, Gessner Rainier followed behind on the left, and the 'CP Big Three' surrounded Wang Hao in the middle.

While walking and chatting, Bronn talked about the problem of annihilation, "Dr. Wang Hao, I read your scientific article on annihilation, it is very imaginative, and your analysis report is related to annihilation, right?" ”

Wang Hao was suddenly a little surprised, "Do you know Chinese?" ”

"It's in English." "It's been translated into English and published, and it's interesting that some unreliable media outlets have taken it as an official report, and I still think there's a big breakthrough in physics research." ”

"Really?" Wang Hao also thought it was interesting to hear it, he didn't expect that the small article on the blog he published could be translated into English and published.

Could it be that his influence is too great?

It's kind of weird......

Brune continued, "If you're not mistaken, you should have published that article before you finished the analysis, right? ”

"Yes." Wang Hao said calmly, "I just had this idea at first, and later analysis supported my idea. The sudden disappearance of the decay signal at a fixed singularity is telling. ”

"Do you have any other evidence?"

"Not yet."

Wang Hao shook his head and said, "So, you can think that that is just my judgment, and other people will have other judgments." ”

Bronn nodded, but he smiled.

A group of people came to the experimental center, and Zhang Yifang talked about tomorrow's report arrangement, and irrelevant people could leave.

Bronn and Rainier also left.

As they walked towards the dining room together, Rainier asked, confused, "Why did you ask that question?" Of course, we know that he just wants to prove that there is a spatial annihilation force. ”

"That's what I'm trying to do."

Brune paused and smiled confidently, "Gessner, if you think about it, there are some crazy people, such as Witten, no matter what he does, he wants to get closer to string theory, and it is not at all a fanatic to say that he is a fan of string theory, but many times, he will make mistakes because of this." ”

Reinier nodded thoughtfully.

Bron continued, "The group of theoretical physicists is the same, they want to find proofs to support their theories. The reason why I ask the question of annihilation is to know whether he made the analysis first, or if he first came up with the concept of annihilation. ”

"It's a different situation. If it was the former, I would be very worried, but he is the latter. So we can think that he is using analysis in the hope of proving annihilation. ”

"It's an absolutely crazy thing."

"If annihilation can be proven, what does it mean? He was able to win the Nobel Prize, become the most famous physicist, and leave his name in human history, but he got cause and effect wrong. ”

"Do you think that analysis is possible before you can draw conclusions based on the analysis, and he draws conclusions first and then makes an analysis?"

Reinier nodded in thought and couldn't help but give Bryn a thumbs up, "I'm not worried at all to hear you say that, but now it's important that we find the problem that was reported." ”

"There must be a problem!"

……

Bron's analysis is logical, coherent and convincing, but the premise of what he says is that annihilation does not exist, is fictional and imaginary.

But the annihilation power was not something that Wang Hao came up with, but the information that was determined by the 'inspiration'.

Although it is not possible to prove the existence of annihilation for the time being, there is nothing wrong with analyzing it in the right direction.

The next morning, many people came to the spectrometer detection experimental center, including mathematics professors from capital universities and researchers from the Institute of Mathematics of the Academy of Sciences.

The most heavyweight is still the two Fields winners - Qiu Chengwen and Cowchel Bilkar.

They were invited by the spectrometer detection experiment group.

The spectrometer detection experimental team sent a message to the universities and invited mathematics professors to come and participate in the review. The Center for Mathematical Sciences at Mizuki University has also received the message, and it is normal to let interested researchers go.

Qiu Chengwen decided to come after hearing the news, he read Wang Hao's article on annihilation, and also knew the news of the report's conclusions, so he decided to come to help 'support'.

He could see at once how much 'destructive power' Wang Hao's analytical conclusion was for the experimental study of CP destruction.

That's the real destruction.

If Wang Hao's conclusion is correct, the efforts of several international CP experimental research groups in the past few years will be in vain, and they will either find a new direction or simply disband on the spot.

This kind of smashing the field will certainly not be welcomed.

Qiu Chengwen simply came over, one was to help to do a support, and on the other hand, because he was interested in Wang Hao's research.

Cowchel Birkall, an I-Lang mathematician, was also invited to work at the Center for Mathematical Sciences, so he came with Qiu Chengwen.

The review team has two Fields winners, and the 'CP Big Three' team and other invited judges are very gorgeous.

When I saw all the judging lineups, I felt like the judging had become an academic event.

When Wang Hao came over in the morning, he was also taken aback by the gorgeous lineup, but he had met with people from the Mathematical Science Center, and others who didn't know each other also met and shook hands to get acquainted, and it was not bad to know some people in the mathematical community.

The time for the presentation was set at nine o'clock.

Wang Hao was in the reception room, sitting with Qiu Chengwen.

Qiu Chengwen cared about the report, asked him if he was confident, and talked about the impact of the report, and couldn't help laughing, "That's how you came to dismantle the stage?" And it's smashing other people's experiments. ”

"I don't want to, but that's the conclusion." Wang Hao said with a wry smile, "It's impossible for me not to publish my conclusions because they have an impact on others, right?" ”

Qiu Chengwen shook his head and said, "Academician Zhang Yifang, the person is still good, but there will definitely be many people who are dissatisfied with you, you should pay attention to it when you make a report, and when the time comes, someone will definitely pick on your problems." ”

"Those two CP sabotage experiment team will never let the report pass easily."

Wang Hao listened and nodded.

The two then did not talk about the reported problem.

Qiu Chengwen asked about the mathematical methods used to prove the Kakutani conjecture, and he was concerned about the same content as Luan Haiping, talking about the annual meeting of the Mathematical Society and the Chern Prize in Mathematics.

Qiu Chengwen said, "I don't know much about this award, but there must be someone who wants to make trouble." ”

He said and shook his head with a sigh, "That's the situation in the country. There are always some clowns who want to win a domestic award and rush to achievement. ”

Qiu Chengwen knew more about it, and he talked about the importance of the Chern Prize in Mathematics.

"It is still difficult to evaluate academicians in mathematics, first of all, to win a few awards, without awards will definitely not be able to convince the public, but international awards, generally difficult, domestic is much easier. If you win this award, you are generally eligible to participate in the co-optation of academicians. ”

"Therefore, the competition for this award is very fierce, but in the end, everything still has to be spoken."

Qiu Chengwen said, "If the level of achievements is about the same, very similar, the joy of dancing is a bit useful, and if the gap between the results is too big, it is useless." You don't have to worry, even if you can't be rated this year, it will definitely be yours the year after. ”

"The reason they can come up with, at most, is some of your achievements, the time is too short, and it has not been included, and this statement will not be valid in the next term."

Qiu Chengwen was not polite at all, and it also gave Wang Hao a deeper understanding of the importance of the Chern Prize in Mathematics.

Of course, there will be many people who want to compete for the most important award for young and middle-aged scholars in China, and its significance is also very large, even if it is only a small award in the world, it is also very important in China.

However, Wang Hao didn't care very much, mainly because he felt that the prize money was too small, and the award was just a name.

He is still so young, he is not in a hurry at all, and it is unlikely that he will be elected as an academician.

In addition, compared with international awards, the domestic Chern Prize in Mathematics has little influence.

Fields and Wolf are both very good awards, and the Shaw Prize in Mathematics is also good, the latter has little influence, but the important thing is that there are many prize moneys.

One million two thousand dollars!

……

Eight fifty-five.

Wang Hao stood on the podium in the lecture hall, and more than 40 people gathered under the podium, each of whom was taken out separately. It can be said that there is some fame and influence.

Among them, there are several academicians, foreign academicians, two Fields winners, one Wolf winner, and many top mathematicians and physicists.

Wang Hao nodded to the audience and said with a smile, "Then, I'll start." ”

"My presentation is mainly divided into two parts, the morning is the data analysis part in the first part, and the afternoon is the mathematical analysis part in the back."

"In the data analysis part, I randomly intercepted the data of three parts of the positive-negative hyperon decay signal of the spectrometer detection experiment for verification, and the results were consistent."

"I'm sure you've verified it with other parts of the data, right?"

He said and looked at Zhang Yifang.

Zhang Yifang nodded and stood up to the others, "We intercepted the data from other parts for verification according to the program provided by Professor Wang Hao, and came to the same conclusion. ”

"Thank you."

Wang Hao expressed his gratitude to Zhang Yifang, and then said, "Then I will mainly talk about the analysis method. ”

He began to explain.

In the first data analysis, he used more than a dozen analysis methods, most of which were conventional methods, and they were just passing by.

There are two difficult methods, one is the aggregation of individual data in the decay signal; The other is to determine the value of the decay signal.

Summing judgment is the difference between overall analysis and individual analysis.

The former is better.

The overall analysis is just a bit complicated and difficult to understand, but after the explanation, everyone understands it, and there is no problem.

The latter is different.

Wang Hao used his own individual data analysis method, and then performed numerical transformation to obtain the corresponding data of the individual.

Most people don't understand this transformation, they don't understand why it is doing this, and whether it will affect the analysis of the original data.

After talking about the method, Gessner-Rainier immediately asked, "Dr. Wang Hao, I think your conversion method is problematic, after the transformation, the value is very different from the original data, and it will definitely affect the final analysis results." ”

"Can you explain why this conversion is being made?"

Wang Hao nodded and said, "This is for the mathematical analysis later." In fact, all the analysis I did was for the mathematical analysis that followed. ”

He turned sideways to the audience and said, "All this analysis is to find data trends to form the basis for mathematical analysis." ”

"The method is the same just now, and the purpose is to do further analysis."

"So how do you prove that this numerical transformation analysis will not affect the final result?" ”

As he spoke, he stood up and explained to the others, "I also admit that Dr. Wang Hao's analytical method is very exquisite, and it can even be said that I can't even think of it. ”

"Everyone can find that the conversion method is very complex, it is not easy to understand, and the final result may have an impact on the subsequent analysis."

"Even if there is no problem with the whole conversion process, the biggest problem is that the final data is very different from the original data, and it can even be said that there is no connection."

"At the very least, it's hard to see the correlation between the data before and after the analysis."

Gessner-Rainier still has a point.

It is true that they did not find a problem in the analysis method, and some people fully understood the analysis process, but there is such a big difference between the two sets of data, how can it be proved that there is no impact on the final analysis results?

Of course.

There are differences between the conclusions and the initial data of many data analyses, and there is certainly no similarity on the surface.

This is also quite normal.

Most people are more concerned with whether the conclusions of the analysis make sense than with the discrepancies between the original and the post-analysis data.

Data analysis is like this, finding a way from a lot of complicated data, no one dares to say, 100% is correct.

Different people can get different analysis results from the same raw data.

Gessner-Rainier's problem is a bit difficult from a professional point of view, but he obviously doesn't see it that way, and since he can't find a problem methodologically, it is natural to investigate the discrepancy between the conclusions and the initial data.

He did not believe in the final conclusion of the analysis at all, and naturally wanted to find the possible problems in it.

Bronn secretly gave a thumbs up to Reinier, he had been listening carefully just now, and found that Wang Hao's analysis process was very rigorous, and there was no problem at all.

The question Rainier was looking for was critical.

If Wang Hao can't make a convincing answer, no matter how rigorous the mathematical analysis is, the conclusion will definitely be questioned.

That's enough.

Wang Hao didn't expect Rainier to ask such a question, but he was extremely sure that his analysis was correct.

He turned his head and revisited the whole process.

No one spoke, no one opened their mouths to bother, and it lasted for about five minutes, and he was thinking very seriously. He then erased the middle part and began to lay out the formula according to the whole process.

One line, one line after another.

At this time, everyone looked at it seriously, they didn't understand what they were doing, some people had already understood, but it still felt incredible.

Wang Hao continued to write, as if he was making a mathematical proof, and kept writing half of the content of the whiteboard, then exhaled lightly, turned his head and said, "Mr. Rainier, this is my answer." ”

Wang Hao staggered to show the whiteboard behind him.

Rainier's face was full of confusion, he only understood part of it, but he didn't understand what was actually written.

Write a bunch of mathematical formulas, derivations?

What's the use?

Wang Hao pointed to the last line of functions and said, "This is the function I listed according to the analysis process, and the whole derivation process is in it." ”

"You can lie about anything, but math doesn't."

"As long as you bring the initial data into this function, you can get a value that is very similar to the second set of data, and the deviation should not exceed one percent."

Wang Hao said confidently, "I believe that this is enough to explain the problem!" ”

As soon as the voice fell, many people in the venue were suddenly surprised.

So quickly, according to the process and conclusion, a complex function has been shaped?

What a fairy level this is!

I took my child to the hospital for a day today, and I said sorry after the update, and there will be an update in the evening.

(End of chapter)