Mason Mathematics Science Laboratory.

Second floor.

In the large labroom next to the central lab, a group of people gathered at Bilkal's desk, staring at the math work he had done on manuscript paper.

The black pen writes clear lines of characters, which makes people unconsciously intoxicated, and through the connotation of the characters, it seems to see the great changes in the future era of science and technology.

Everyone was focused, everyone was holding their breath, everyone was holding their breath.

There were two smears of blue and black in the corners of Bilkar's eyes, obviously a little underrested, but he seemed very energetic, and he was also very excited, and forced the excitement to complete the last part of the content.

Comparative judgment.

Detailed calculations.

Substitute numbers, transform, and then determine and convert equations.

When the last symbol was written, Bilkar didn't even check it, so he immediately clenched his fist hard, and everyone else cheered excitedly, "Yay~~"

"It's done! It's finally done!"

"Carchel, your method of using geometric inverse transformation equations is wonderful!"

"Your graphical stitching logic is also excellent!"

"This is the best research!"

"We're done!"

Everybody was very excited, everybody was very excited.

Wang Hao and Bilkar hugged each other, and Lin Bohan, Luo Dayong, and He Yi, Yan Jing, Zhang Zhiqiang and others who were watching also came over to hug them.

It's a really exciting moment.

Everyone knows how significant the research is done.

If history will have a record, they relied on theoretical research at this moment to officially open the "superconducting era" of human science and technology.

After the excitement, Wang Hao asked Zhang Zhiqiang to help organize the internal celebration, and then also talked about the thesis, "We can start preparing the thesis, today we have a day off, and tomorrow we will start writing the thesis." ”

"Our main paper should be completed together, and your respective papers should also be prepared, preferably published together, and I will contact academic journals in advance."

"Let's go back to rest first, recuperate our spirits, and go out to dinner together in the evening."

"Paper, wait until you have a break!"

During this time, everyone is very busy, they are fully engaged in their work, and it is good to be able to sleep six hours a day.

Just look at Bilkar's mental state, everyone else is similar, even Wang Hao, except for sleeping, he is doing research.

Now I can finally breathe a sigh of relief.

Wang Hao returned to his office, and instead of resting immediately, he wrote an email to Baker Campbell, head of the physics department of Nature, to make an appointment for publication in advance.

The content of the e-mail is like this--

"My team has made new progress in the follow-up research on the superconductivity mechanism, and I will be able to submit the paper in the next week, can I publish it in the next newsletter?"

Wang Hao did not consider the issue of review, he had submitted two manuscripts before, and published the content of "Superconductivity Law" and "Yang-Mills Equation Prediction Particle Collision Experiment" in succession.

He is the leader of new fields and the most authoritative figure in the world.

Publication of subsequent research results in the same field naturally does not require review.

In addition, the review can be very complex.

If they want to find a professional to review the content they are studying, they must verify the conclusions, and even the verification of two elements requires a team to calculate for a long time, and it also needs to be verified experimentally.

That's just too complicated.

There is a time difference of more than eight hours between China and the Eagle Kingdom, and Campbell only saw the content of the email sent by Wang Hao when he came to work in the morning.

"What's New in Superconductivity Research? Wang Hao's team?"

Campbell immediately realized that it was a big study.

Seeing that Wang Hao said to catch up with the content of the next issue, and the next issue of "Nature" is a week later, even the next issue of "Nature-Physics", the interval is only two days.

Then there will definitely be no review time.

He hesitated for a moment, but decided to agree first, "Dr. Wang Hao, of course your research can be published." I will arrange the layout in advance and wait for the submission at any time. ”

After sending the email, Campbell was still a little hesitant, Wang Hao's two results were published in the journal Nature, the first was a study related to the "law of superconductivity", or after a detailed review.

The second is the "Yang-Mills Equation Prediction Particle Collision Experiment", because the prediction has already occurred, which means that the study has been confirmed, and it is naturally different from the review.

This time is different.

Based on the AC gravity experiment, the direction of studying the superconductivity mechanism has attracted international attention, and some experimental groups on the side of American have made progress related to the experiment, and some will submit papers to the journal Nature.

Wang Hao's research progress will definitely attract attention, but if there are results, peer review is needed, right?

The journal Nature must guarantee the quality and correctness of the paper.

Campbell, of course, does not question the quality of the submission, but he still feels that professional review is necessary and can rule out the possibility of being extremely unlikely.

The internal rule of Nature is also that "as long as you are not sure about the correct paper, you need to peer review".

He hesitated.

Campbell picked up the phone and wanted to ask the editor-in-chief, Magdalina Skipper, and then suddenly thought of Donald Conedy, a colleague he knew at the banquet.

Donald Corneday is the editor-in-chief of Science, a comprehensive journal and academic journal like Nature, and there has always been fierce competition.

If it were Donald Conedy, what would you do in the face of this kind of thing?

Campbell simply sent Donald Conedy an email, briefly talking about what he had encountered, and asking for his opinion.

Donald Corneday is the editor-in-chief of Science, and she's also a female editor-in-chief, and both the heads of Science and Nature are women, which is probably what the two top academic journals have in common.

Conidy received Campbell's email and immediately replied, "Reviewing is a necessary process. ”

"No matter how famous the other party is, he must review the manuscript, even if he is the winner of an international award, there is a possibility that new research will go wrong."

Conedy said a few words of his opinion, and also copied a passage from the journal Science that all research articles need to be peer-reviewed before they appear in publication, and if there is uncertainty about the content of the research, it can be classified as controversial articles.

There are historical reasons for this provision.

Twenty years ago, the journal Science retracted eight papers published by the German physicist Hendrik because many of the data in the articles had been fabricated by the authors.

Later, a biologist from the Han country, Hwang Woo-seok, published a paper on the research of human stem cell cloning embryos, which was found to be obviously fraudulent by Seoul National University.

During this period, other fraud incidents were discovered, and Science magazine was caught in the vortex of public opinion.

Later, the investigators set up by Science found that although some of the papers were reviewed according to normal procedures, they could not do anything about the deliberate falsification.

Therefore, the Board of Inquiry recommended that the manuscripts received should be classified as non-controversial and controversial articles so that controversial articles could be scrutinized more rigorously.

Campbell naturally knew this history, and after receiving Conedy's reply, he thought that the other party's suggestion was very reasonable, so he wrote an email to Wang Hao, "Dr. Wang Hao, we will quickly review your latest research, don't worry, the next issue will be published at the latest." ”

Wang Hao saw Campbell's email the next day, and he felt a little inexplicable.

Review?

In the direction of studying superconductivity mechanisms based on alternating gravity experiments, his research still needs to be peer-reviewed?

Who are your peers?

Are there other scholars who are also studying semi-topological geometry and have some results?

Wang Hao was a little puzzled, he was very confident in the research, but he was unwilling to wait for the review process.

Reviewing a manuscript always feels like being "reviewed", and it feels like you are being offended when your research needs to be affirmed by others before it can be published.

So he contacted Donald again-

Cornedy.

Science magazine also pays close attention to him, and always sends him emails asking for his research to be published in Science.

Wang Hao sent the same email.

Less than an hour later, he received a reply from Donald Conedy, "Dr. Wang Hao, I am very excited about your email. ”

"The moment I saw the mail, I felt my blood boiling all over my body!"

"The latest research about you and your team certainly doesn't need to be reviewed."

"In the field of science, you have stood at the highest peak, you have no peers, even scholars in the same field, whether it is mathematics, physics, or other disciplines, they can only look up to you."

"I think a peer review would be an offense to you."

"On behalf of Science, I welcome your submissions and look forward to your latest research!"

Looking at the content of the email, Wang Hao nodded with great satisfaction.

Do you see it?

That's what professionalism is all about!

……

A week later.

The main thesis has been fully completed.

Wang Hao pondered the content of the paper for a long time, and sent the paper to the institution in charge of confidentiality, and made an explanation of the public content.

When everything was done, he uploaded the paper to Arxiv, and then sent a brief summary of the results and the details of the paper to Donald Conedy's mailbox.

Wang Hao has been studying the published content for a long time, because some technologies cannot be disclosed, but theories can be disclosed.

Even if it is only theoretical, it is necessary to publish it carefully, and their research includes the content of directly calculating the superconducting critical temperature of the combination of elements.

This part is also the most important.

They also made a detailed argument and determined that just calculating the two-element combination would take a long time for a professional math team to complete.

If you scale it up to a three-element combination, the calculations become extremely complex, and it takes a top math team months or even more than a year to complete them, and even if they do, the error rate is high.

That's a lot of work.

Therefore, the disclosure of the theory is still supported by the superiors, and similar research also requires the participation of a large number of mathematicians, physicists and experimental groups to slowly improve the superconducting "two-element" combination system.

Only by perfecting the combination system of two elements can we progress to the systematic study of the three elements, rather than directly calculating the combination of the three elements.

It takes a long time and a lot of people to participate in it, and it's definitely a big and systematic project.

Wang Hao already knows that a combination of three elements that is most in line with the semi-topological system is equivalent to a huge advantage, and can directly enter the research of ultra-high temperature superconducting materials.

Even if other institutions in the same field rely on their published results to conduct research, it will take at least five years or more to catch up with this step if it costs a lot of manpower and money.

This is still a case of good luck, if you are unlucky, it may take longer, maybe ten or twenty years may not be able to catch up.

In fact, technological superiority is a matter of time difference.

When a technology involves the civilian field, it is impossible to keep it completely secret, such as foreign high-end materials, as long as it involves the civilian field, it will definitely be sold publicly, and some domestic institutions can obtain materials through reverse engineering, study the constituent elements of the material, and then study how to manufacture it.

The same will be true for superconducting materials in the future, as long as large-scale applications are involved, there will definitely be institutions to carry out reverse engineering, even if the speed is slow, it will take a few years or more than ten years to "reverse and come out."

The so-called scientific and technological advantages are not completely confidential, but a few years or more advanced than other institutions, so there are always enough advantages.

Other institutions have obtained higher-end products and slowly caught up in a few years, while institutions at the forefront of technology have developed higher-end products.

Wang Hao completed the submission of the main paper, and he became a little excited.

In the following days, he made a series of submissions, all of which were submitted to New Advances in Mathematics

There are three papers in total, and the main authors of the papers are Luo Dayong, Bierkar and Lin Bohan.

The three papers are "Architectural Logic of Complex Geometry Splitting and Reduction", "Repeated Combination Method for Describing High-dimensional Node Graphs", and "Topology to Semi-Topology Definition Trend".

Wang Hao is a co-author of each of these papers, and he is also a co-author of the main paper.

……

The publication of the latest research results is the fast-forward start of the journal Science.

Science is very similar to Nature in that the main journal publishes some newsletters, that is, some introductions to the latest results.

The introduction of the main journal is only one or two pages, like reading an express newspaper, but for Wang Hao's latest achievements, Science gives a full five pages of content.

The introduction of a research result in five pages can be said to be unprecedented.

This is enough to see the importance that Science attaches to the results, and it also proves how influential the results will be, as soon as the new issue of the magazine came out, the results of semi-topology attracted the attention of the world.

Just like the evaluation of the results in Science, written by Donald Conedy himself, "this is the research that Wang Hao and his team carried out together, and it is an extension of" the law of superconductivity, and 'Wang's geometry,' . ”

"The law of superconductivity is no longer limited to calculating the critical temperature of superconductivity for a single element, but has been extended to include two elements, three elements, and even more, including all matter."

"We can imagine that in the future, we can even calculate the superconducting critical temperature of complex organic compounds."

"Now we can announce that the problem of superconducting critical temperature has been completely solved, and the application of superconducting technology is about to usher in an era of explosion!"

This is definitely a big breakthrough in the theory of superconductivity mechanism, and it can even be said that it has cracked the theoretical mechanism.

Wang Hao's research closely correlates the elemental composition with the critical temperature of superconductivity, and the superconducting temperature of a certain material can be directly calculated without experiments.

After the release of the new issue of Science, the research immediately aroused international heated discussions.

"The previous research was only for a single element, but now it has been extended to multiple elements, which can directly do computational ......"

"This is also amazing, it is said that Stanford University has just established a project for this research, and they have a lot of mathematicians and physicists who are ready to conduct research together, and Wang Hao's team has already achieved results."

"It looks like they can just disband......"

"But the calculations must be complicated, right? I've heard an expert say that calculations for a single element are already complicated, and if it's two or three elements, the difficulty will definitely increase exponentially......"

"In any case, with this research, it will definitely be easier to develop superconducting materials with higher critical temperatures that can be applied to industry!"