Lecture Hall.

Thales Parisi stood on the podium and looked at everyone in the audience with a gentle smile on her face.

If you pay close attention, you can still see that he is constantly aiming at Wang Hao in the westerly position, because his research is aimed at Wang Hao's annihilation theory.

Wang Hao will definitely stand up.

Not only did Parisi not care, but there was something to look forward to.

He is a theoretical physicist who has been doing research on condensate physics for more than 20 years, and the basic theory of condensate physics combined with theoretical mathematical analysis can be said to be his professional field.

In this field, Parisi said that it was second, and no one dared to say that it was first. Many people also looked in Wang Hao's direction.

Parisi replaces the role of annihilation forces in semi-topological theory with another mathematical analysis based on the theory of condensation physics, which is almost equivalent to excluding the theory of annihilation from the content of superconducting semi-topological theory.

This can be said to be a modification of the theory of superconducting semitopology.

If you consider that the annihilation theory was put forward by Wang Hao, it is almost equivalent to a challenge to Wang Hao.

Many people still support Parisi, because his theory is based on the conventional condensation physics theory, and he does not completely deny the semi-topological theory, which is equivalent to adding the conventional condensation physics theory to the semi-topological theory, which greatly enhances the status and importance of the condensation physics theory.

In everyone's attention, Wang Hao's face showed a light smile.

He was pleased that the research done by Parisi, whether correct or incorrect, had inspired him.

[Task 3]

[Research Project Title: Constructing a Mathematical System of Annihilation Theory (Difficulty: S+)] [Inspiration: 40.] 】

The S+ difficulty level of task inspiration, once again reaching a multiple of twenty, is equivalent to completing a study. Even if he didn't complete the research, Wang Hao didn't care about Parisi's provocation.

The other party is a clown.

Of course, the annihilation theory is not something that can be denied by a small study, because the application of the theory is not only the superconducting mechanism, but also includes the analysis of the Yang-Mills equation, which predicts the problem of missing data in particle collision experiments.

These are not things that can be covered up by a substitute theoretical study.

Parisi also just took a clever approach, gave a few basic definitions, and replaced the role of annihilation with another structure, because Wang Hao was very sure that annihilation existed.

Then there must be something wrong with Parisi's argument. Now it's just a matter of finding out where the problem is.

Wang Hao has established a new mission - [Task 4]

[Title of Research Project: Identifying Problems in Parisi's New Theory (Difficulty: E.)] [Inspiration value: 0.] 】

"Difficulty is only E?"

Wang Hao was a little ridiculous when he saw the difficulty of the task, and the research with a difficulty of only E showed that there was no exploration value, and the difficulty of solving the problem was also very low.

Maybe he didn't need to come forward at all, and when the meeting was over, someone would naturally find out the problem in the study.

Wang Hao felt the atmosphere of the venue, and when he was about to stand up, someone was faster than him. "Mr. Parisi!"

Paul Phil-Jones' shout captured the attention of the audience.

Parisi was a little puzzled when he saw Paul Phil-Jones, he didn't know who the other party was, and the people who could come to this room and sit in the third row must have been scholars of some fame, and the young man who stood up was too strange to him.

Someone around recognized Paul Phil-Jones.

The last time Wang Hao did a research report on the Yang-Mills equation, Paul Phil-Jones came to the stage to do the mathematical framework of the cross-dimensional research of M-theory, and his genius can be said to shock the world.

Although Paul Phil-Jones was not able to replace the annihilation theory with string theory, the degree of genius he showed was very deep.

He is also known as a professor at California Polytechnic University and a well-known genius in the field of string theory.

Paul Phil-Jones stood up and asked with all seriousness, "Mr. Parisi, how do you prove it?"

Are you right? ”

After he finished speaking, he explained, "If there is no problem with my understanding, you just found an explanation that replaced the effect of annihilation, but it does not mean that your explanation is correct. ”

"Of course."

Thales-Parisi spread his hands and smiled, "I just found another explanation." ”

"This is an explanation based on the theory of condensation physics. No theory can be denied as long as it cannot be proven wrong. ”

Someone in the front row reminded Thales Parisi, who already knew Paul Phil-Jones, and added, "Just like you, you can't prove string theory right." Of course, I'm not denying string theory. If it had been Paul Phil-Jones before, he would have been angered by this sentence.

Now he reacted strangely, as if not taking what Thales Parisi said seriously, but continued, "You're right. Any theory cannot be disproved or denied, but as a scholar, we can choose to believe it or not to believe it. ”

As he spoke, he looked around and said to everyone in the room, "If I had to choose between two theories, I would prefer the Annihilation Theory. ”

"The reason is simple."

He pointed to the stage and said, "That's ugly!" After speaking, he swept the people around him again, and added, "What I want to say is already finished." ”

Thales Parisi was so choked with a sentence that he almost vomited blood, and he felt that Paul Phil-Jones was pointing at him and scolding him.

Ugly?

He glanced back at the whiteboard.

Admittedly, there is nothing wrong with Paul Phil-Jones's statement. Many people in the venue were also aware of the problem.

Paul Phil-Jones didn't point out the problem directly, but what he said made a lot of sense to mathematicians.

Mathematics is beautiful.

Many theoretical physicists are immersed in their own research because the mathematics they construct is so perfect that it is like a work of art in knowledge.

String theory was first admired because of the mathematical beauty it exhibited, which led people to believe that it was real.

Thales-Parisi's mathematics, the "force-pulled" near-semi-topological theory, naturally cannot show any mathematical beauty.

Ugly, or praised.

Some scholars even think it's just a piece of shit.

They hadn't noticed anything before, and when Paul Phil-Jones pointed out the problem, they immediately put an 'X' on Parisi's theory.

Thales-Parisi, who is also a theoretical physicist, also has the same support for the "beauty" of mathematics, but he must support his theory, explaining that "knowledge is not necessarily beautiful, and sometimes correctness is more important than beauty." ”

The scene was immediately divided into two factions.

One faction is the pro-Thales-Parisi, which is dominated by a group of traditional condensed physicists. Other scholars are the second faction.

It is true that knowledge is not necessarily beautiful, but it is like two paintings placed in front of them, one is a high-end painting by an artist, and the other is a picture of a chicken pecking at rice with graffiti, and they will naturally appreciate the former.

What's more, Parisi couldn't deny the annihilation theory at all, and he just forcibly pasted his theory as a semi-topological theory.

Wang Hao stood up.

For a moment, the venue became quiet.

Wang Hao had a smile on his face, and he asked very indifferently, "Mr. Palich, can I go to the stage and say it?" ”

"Absolutely."

Parisi made a gesture of pity.

Wang Hao walked to the stage very indifferently, and waved his hand to the others, just like a star. Then he stood in front of the whiteboard where Parisi was making a report, and gave everyone a simple combing from the very beginning of the theory--

"In the beginning, it was defined by basic theory."

"The rest of the story is to find some of the basic mathematical constructs of semi-topological theory..... "Last ....."

It took about five minutes for Wang Hao to sort out the entire research process, and the scholars in the audience also thought about it and understood it.

And then Wang Hao

He walked to the side, relinquished his position to Parisi, and said, "Mr. Parisi, three questions. ”

He used his hand to compare the number three, and then said, "First of all, your definition at the beginning can be understood as an idea based on existing theories, right? ”

Parisi thought and nodded, "That's right. ”

Wang Hao continued, "In addition, the most important logic you gave in the middle part to replace the annihilation theory is that the ion lattice will spontaneously rotate at ultra-low temperatures, so I understand it this way, right? ”

“..... Of course. ”

Parisi suddenly felt that something was wrong.

Wang Hao smiled, "So your research is based on these two items, one is the idea based on the existing theory, and the second is that the particle lattice will rotate spontaneously, and it is difficult to say whether the latter exists." ”

"If the ion lattice spontaneously rotates at low temperatures, the research done so far may have been determined long ago?"

Parisi immediately retorted, "But maybe it hasn't been measured yet, and no one knows what kind of behavior the particle lattice will exhibit when it spontaneously rotates." ”

"Okay. Suppose, you're right. ”

Wang Hao didn't continue to argue, he pursed his mouth vigorously, and continued, "Even if all the above two items are true, your definition is correct, and the particle lattice will spontaneously rotate, but your conclusion seems to have nothing to do with the main direction of condensation physics, because what you ultimately argue is the order of atoms, not electrons." ”

After he finished speaking, he calmly returned to his seat. “-?”

Parisi didn't understand for a moment.

The venue fell silent for a short time, and then slowly became enthusiastic. Some people are already aware of the problem.

Regardless of whether Parisi's theory is correct or not, his research is moving closer to the theory of semi-topology, and the conclusion ultimately proves that the atomic ordering, not the electron waves in the principal direction of condensate physics.

In other words.....

Even if his research is correct, it is of no significance to the study of conventional condensation physics. What's the use of that!?

The last time Paul Phil-Jones questioned Wang's research, it was to replace the role of annihilation theory with string theory, which was hardly supported by scholars in other fields, because their field of study was not string theory.

It's the same now.

Parisi's research was indeed based on the theory of condensation physics, but in the end it was aimed at demonstrating the deflection of the direction of the atom, which had little to do with the theory of condensation physics.

So what reason do they have to support Parisi?

Wang Hao did not deny Thales' work, but his new research has nothing to do with conventional condensation physics.

"Correct, incorrect, what's the use?" "It's none of our business anyway."

"This research can be said to be worthless! Thales didn't know what he was doing, did he want to study the theory of annihilation? ”

Parisi is also aware of the problem.

He looked back at his research and couldn't help but smile bitterly in his heart, he hoped to replace the role of the annihilation theory with a condensation physics theory.

The theory is certainly unprovable, but he thinks it will certainly win the support of condensate physicists. It's good now.

The end result of his theory is that it is still detached from conventional condensation physics. Without support, what is left?

··..·.

After the end of the day's meeting, many people were still discussing Parisi's report, but the focus of the discussion was Wang Hao.

A lot of people have figured it out.

After Parisi's report, they only understood the process and couldn't find any problems in the report, or no problems at all.

Because, it's just definitions, theories.

Wang Hao found the problem in just a few words, and also supported "digging" the foundation of Parisi's support.

They were all shocked by Wang Hao's level of mathematics, and at the same time, they were also surprised by Wang Hao's understanding of the conventional condensation physics theory.

If you don't have a good understanding of the conventional theory of condensation physics, even if you have a high level of mathematics, you will not be able to find out the problems in Parisi's research.

Many scholars have a good impression of Wang Hao because of this.

Although Wang Hao

The theories they came up with were about to ruin their jobs, but at least Wang Hao was not a "layman", and he also had in-depth research on condensation physics.

Some people also approached Wang Hao to discuss and ask about the future of condensation physics research.

Wang Hao said seriously, "I am trying to do a research, which is to open up the connection between my semi-topological theory and the conventional condensation physics theory. ”

"Specifically, the conventional condensation physics theory is used to shape the mathematical basis of the annihilation theory and build a bridge between the two."

"I think conventional condensation physics research is still very meaningful." "Semi-topological theory is not perfect."

"Everyone should know how complicated the calculation can be if you are demonstrating the superconducting critical temperature of a complex elemental matter."

"At that time, the study of conventional condensation physics will become the support of another direction of the theoretical foundation!"

After listening to Wang Hao's words, Wang Chenglin and Du Jianhua were a little anxious, they were ready to go back and start researching.

Now that Wang Hao has said the content of the research, there may be many competitors in the future. This is not good news!

"It looks like it's time to hurry, it's going to be fast!" "Prepare in advance!"

"If it's fast, you can get some results, and if you lag behind, the research will lose its meaning..... ＂