The new issue of Annihilation Physics and Theory features three papers from the Mason Number Lab.

The list of authors of the paper includes all members of the study group.

Among them, "Zero State Energy" and "Tachyon Particle Flow", the main author list includes four people, namely Paul Phil-Jones, Helen, Chen Mengmeng and Ding Zhiqiang.

The last article, "Time Independence under Conventional Field Forces", is mainly written by Wang Hao, and Paul Phil-Jones, Chen Mengmeng, Helen and others are listed in the author column.

Compared to the fact that the paper came from the Mason Number Lab and that there are four Nobel laureates in physics among the authors of the paper, the publication of the paper is still very low-key.

This time it's really low-key, and the impact after the release is also low-key.

The world is focusing on the most important election issues, and many of the world's leading physicists have been interviewed to express their opinions.

They do it for a reason.

When the campaign included a section on scientific and technological support, academics found themselves in higher stature, especially the top physicists, who were always interviewed by media reporters to find out their attitudes towards antimatter research.

As a result, many physicists do not have the heart to do research.

In the new issue of "Annihilation Physics and Theory", the number of orders has not changed much, but the number of people who view it at the first time has decreased.

On the day of the publication of the new issue, public opinion at home and abroad could be said to be undisturbed, until the next morning, a medium-sized media disclosed that the new issue of "Annihilation Physics and Theory" had Wang Hao as the main author.

The media obviously didn't understand the content.

Wang Hao's name has a huge appeal in the academic world, and it is not small in terms of public opinion, while several other heavyweight scholars, including Paul Phil-Jones, Helen, and Chen Mengmeng, the three Nobel laureates in physics, have been directly ignored.

Of course, being ignored is only temporary.

As time passed, the report began to show an exponential rise, and the rise was initially caused by the words of Bentley Williams, a professor at Caltech, "You can interview me now, I just read the latest paper, it is Wang Hao's, it is Paul's." ”

"Wang Hao, you must know that Paul, the Nobel laureate in physics, in fact, he used to be a professor at the California Institute of Technology."

"Yes, we are colleagues, but we don't have a good relationship, it's not a big deal, because in school, I want to find someone who has a good relationship with him...... It's hard, even the students hate him. ”

"It doesn't matter at this time, of course, I'm talking about his new work."

"Although I hate him very much, I must admit that the content of this new work is very good, and his research denies antimatter, not the existence of antimatter, but the creation of antimatter in the explosion."

After Bentley Williams finished speaking, he said, "You're right, I'm definitely rooting for the No. 2 candidate, because he's more sensible about science than blank promises." ”

"I don't believe in antimatter, let alone antimatter technology."

Bentley-Williams' interview led a large group of people to the new issue of Annihilation Physics and Theory, and they immediately noticed three papers.

Judging from the name of the paper, it is all about theoretical physics, and it seems that it has nothing to do with antimatter.

In terms of content......

Most people can't understand it!

Some top scholars also went to read the paper, and they carefully studied and understood that the so-called 'negation of antimatter' appeared in the first paper, and the study set up the existence of a kind of energy called 'zero state energy', and believed that in the state of 'strong annihilation force field with the limit of energy intensity', a large amount of zero state energy will be accumulated, thereby annihilating active particles and releasing energy that conforms to the mass-energy equation.

In other words, the first paper argues that the cause of the explosion accident is the annihilation of active particles and the release of a huge amount of pure energy.

The latter two can be said to be supplements to the first.

Most of the content in the first article is setting, there is no complete mathematical foundation, and the mathematical logic does not form a closed loop, and there are many doubts.

The second article supplements the content by demonstrating the existence of tachyon particles under normal annihilation fields.

Later, it was also said that a tachyon particle flow was generated, "which is to penetrate and enter the cosmic space with a conventional force field within the ultra-high-energy strong annihilation force field".

The particles in the strong annihilation force field will become more active, and the speed of light is higher than the normal force field, and the flow of tachyon particles passing through the strong annihilation force field will not immediately return to the speed of light due to the influence of inertia, but continue to exist in a state of faster than the speed of light.

The second paper is still imperfect, and when it comes to the speed of light, the Theory of Relativity will definitely come to mind.

The last article is a supplement to the second one, which demonstrates the time problem in the 'tachyon particle flow', and if the time problem is solved, more than 90% of the problem is solved.

The third paper is also the most complex.

It takes a long time for even the most elite mathematicians and physicists to understand the entirety of the third paper.

The media certainly can't wait.

When the reporter interviewed several top physicists, they immediately reported on the content obtained, "Wang Hao's latest research negates the "Theory of Relativity"!" ”

"Wang Hao VS Einstein, who do you support?"

"Is the Theory of Relativity true or false? Wang Hao's research believes that there is an error in the part of the "Theory of Relativity" about time and space! ”

As the story continues, the topic becomes more focused.

Some scientists who oppose antimatter research stand up and affirmatively say, "Wang Hao's research believes that antimatter does not exist. It is not antimatter that occurs in an explosion, but the annihilation of particles. ”

"The explosion accident has nothing to do with antimatter, and there is no basis for the so-called 'antimatter support'."

"Now we can be sure that the research on antimatter can be declared over before it has even begun."

"There is no one in the physics community who is more authoritative than Wang Hao, who denied the appearance of antimatter in experiments, then we can think that at least there is no antimatter in experiments......"

When the topic of science is added to the campaign, it naturally attracts a lot of coverage, and many top academics have come forward to make a statement.

Candidate No. 1 immediately became passive.

The support team of candidate No. 1 came up with a plan called 'antimatter research', and if antimatter did not appear in the explosion, their plan would be meaningless.

The support team reacted immediately and threw out various statements, "Wang Hao believes that the explosion accident has nothing to do with antimatter, it does not mean that antimatter cannot be studied, in fact, we have been investing in this area and have accumulated it for decades......"

"Wang Hao is not necessarily right, his research is just a theory."

"We are convinced that antimatter exists, and a theoretical study does not mean anything."

"Wang Hao not only denied antimatter, he also denied the "Theory of Relativity", this kind of research itself is meaningless, and the physics community cannot accept it."

This statement is somewhat useful.

A large number of physicists cannot even accept the existence of tachyon, and naturally cannot accept the denial of the "Theory of Relativity".

Even if it's just a theory of space-time relativity......

Not at all!

These physicists have come forward and expressed their opinions, but their influence does not seem to be very good, and the direction of public opinion without them has a direct effect.

The reason for this is still attributed to Wang Hao.

Wang Hao is recognized as the world's first mathematician and physicist, no scientist dares to compare with him, and in the hearts of many people, his achievements have surpassed Einstein, Newton and other historical figures.

One is recognized as the number one scientist.

On the other side is a whole bunch of politicians and 'unknown' academics, who would he trust in front of an ordinary person?

There is no doubt about the results.

The vast majority of people will believe that the first scientist, even if it is a scientist from another country, because the first scientist is 'face-saving' and can already make a name in history, so why lie?

Politicians and 'unknown' academics are different.

They can lie for many reasons, and they can explain it just to achieve their goals.

As for the 'negation of the Theory of Relativity', is it important?

In other words, Newtonian mechanics, maybe more people know about it, "The Theory of Relativity" is really a bit lofty for ordinary people, most of them have just heard the name.

So, it doesn't matter at all.

Of course, the rejection of the Theory of Relativity is important for physicists.

The Theory of Relativity is written into textbooks and is widely used and studied in astrophysics and physics.

Many in the physics community said, "Absolutely unacceptable." ”

There has been a lot of opposition in the academic community, who believe that Wang Hao's research is wrong, and even think that Wang Hao has fabricated the research.

Latter......

Soon there was a new explanation.

When the support team of candidate No. 1 found that the results of the research did not seem to be very good, he immediately changed his statement, "I have reason to suspect that candidate No. 2 has contact with Wang Hao's team." ”

"Wang Hao's team supports the No. 2 candidate, so they compiled such a research paper, maybe there is a transfer of interests between them."

"It's a very bad act."

"We think we should launch an investigation into ......"

That's a conspiracy theory.

However, there is still a market for conspiracy theories, especially among the team that supports the No. 1 decision-maker, including the world-famous media moguls.

What followed was the overwhelming coverage.

Ordinary people will find relevant content as long as they watch the news, saying that 'the No. 2 candidate is likely to have a relationship with Wang Hao's team', "there is a transfer of interests between them, in exchange for the support of Wang Hao's team", and "it is simply an act of treason......

Wait a minute.

When public opinion becomes like this, the content of the paper seems to become unimportant, and the focus has become whether Wang Hao's team has anything to do with the No. 2 candidate.

……

In this public opinion environment, the No. 2 candidate will naturally not sit idly by.

They immediately held a press conference to confront the media's denial of the relationship, and publicly stated, "We can accept all the investigations in this regard." ”

"We are very sure that we have not had any communication with Wang Hao's team."

"This is pure slander!"

The support team of candidate No. 2 also has a certain amount of media resources, so naturally there are a lot of negative relationships and negative antimatter reports.

The confrontation between the two candidates seems to be lively, but it is actually a regular operation of the campaign.

Slandering opponents and pouring dirt on opponents is a situation that occurs in every election campaign, and the relevant departments will indeed conduct certain investigations.

But it's just 'definitely'.

It is impossible to investigate similar issues in a short period of time.

The content of public opinion still affected Wang Hao.

Many domestic and foreign media have applied for interviews with Mason Number Labs, and the reporters know that it is very difficult to interview Wang Hao, so they choose the next target.

For example, Paul Phil-Jones, Ding Zhiqiang and others.

In the face of boiling public opinion in the outside world, Wang Hao and others discussed it and decided to accept an interview, and they wanted to hold a public press conference.

The conference site is a large conference room of Xihai University.

Wang Hao, Chen Mengmeng, Ding Zhiqiang and others sat in a row, and Ding Zhiqiang first made a statement on the research, "We have been studying the principle of replicating the explosion experiment. ”

"There are many international claims about antimatter, but we believe that antimatter did not appear in the experiment, because there is no physical basis to support it, and the strong annihilation force field cannot make matter out of thin air."

"We believe that the cause of the explosion was the annihilation of neutrons."

"In this direction, we studied for several months and summarized the theory of "zero state energy" to explain the problem of annihilation mass points."

Ding Zhiqiang made a statement on the study as a whole

After that, Paul Phil-Jones, Helen and Chen Mengmeng explained the three research papers in detail, and Paul Phil-Jones also demonstrated the 'closed-loop mathematical logic' on the spot, which made the on-site reporters dizzy and many people simply blocked their ears.

Paul Phil-Jones, who doesn't care about the journalists, is angry that his research is being questioned, "If you look at the paper carefully, you can see that our mathematical logic has formed a closed loop. ”

"The physical theory of retreat mathematical logic is a great achievement in itself, and it is ridiculous to question the theory!"

"If anyone questions our research, it can be done math or experimentally!"

Paul gritted his teeth when he spoke.

The reporters in the audience were stunned, they didn't know what to say for a while, and even though Paul's attitude was bad, none of them raised their hands to ask questions.

Paul waited for a long time, and found that no one asked questions, before nodding with satisfaction, "It seems that you also agree with my words......"

Except for Helen, everyone else had strange expressions.

Of course, it's good to get used to it.

Wang Hao simply pretended that Paul had not spoken, he motioned to the press officer, and began the free questioning stage.

The reporters' questions all pointed to Wang Hao.

The first domestic reporter to stand up asked, "Is your research a detailed analysis of the principle of the replica explosion experiment?" So, the causes of the explosion accident are fully understood? ”

"In a way, that's right."

Wang Hao said, "On this basis, we can avoid similar explosions in various ways, but theoretically speaking, it is not perfect, and we need to continue to study this aspect." ”

The second reporter who stood up asked, "Does the absence of antimatter in the explosion mean that antimatter does not exist?" Now many people in the world are concerned about this issue. ”

Wang Hao said, "The two are unrelated. ”

"I can only express my opinion. There is a lot of research on antimatter internationally, but there are no clear experiments that have definitely found antimatter. ”

"Now we can't be sure of the existence of antimatter, and its theories can't be denied."

The third person to stand up was a foreign journalist, who asked a very focused question, "Mr. Wang Hao, do you support the No. 2 candidate?" ”

The press officer immediately saw Wang Hao.

Wang Hao waved his hand indifferently and replied, "I personally will not express my opinion on this kind of issue, and in addition, I personally will not affect the election campaign on the other side of the world." ”

The reporter immediately asked, "What if you can influence it?" Which candidate will you support? ”

A security guard with a gun walked towards the reporter.

Wang Hao didn't seem to see it, and continued to answer the question normally, "I just said that I won't express my opinion, so I will add one more sentence, I have never thought about this question." ”

"My time is devoted to scientific research, and your question doesn't make sense to me."

"Of course, if you insist that I say which one to support......"

The venue fell silent.

The guards with guns stopped for a moment.

Wang Hao smiled lightly, "-I support science!" ”