I am a veteran author of China Literature, and I have also written several high-quality books in China Literature.

I am also grateful to the starting point, it is the starting point, which allows me to have a bite to eat, and I have always felt that the starting point is my second home.

However, what has happened in the past year or so has made me go from hope to disappointment, and then from disappointment to despair.

Despair, this is not a pleasant taste!

When I joined the starting point in the early years, I was still a street writer, mixing full attendance and buyout at the outstation, and I have always aimed at the starting point, and I want to make a career on the leading website in the online literature industry.

I identify with the starting point, recognize the starting point, and strive for it.

However, after more than a year, my heart has gradually cooled down.

I still remember that when the old team left, Genesis once came to me and gave me a not low buyout price, which I rejected with a mouthful, this buyout price once made me very excited, but I still chose the starting point, I believe that the starting point will make me preach, will make me a god.

I still remember that at that time, there were many authors in the group discussing whether to create the world or leave a starting point, but the vast majority of people who were confident in their own strength chose to stay, our idea is very simple, only the starting point is the only place to preach.

Who wouldn't want to go up?

The policy after the starting point, I think it is also very good, the half-year bonus has been raised, and the attendance system has been made, although the reward has been a little bit, but, overall, the income has increased.

Of course, I also have to complain about the bonus coins, which is really disgusting.

Last year, as soon as the old team came back, they were also very happy, after the merger of the two websites, China Literature Group will definitely become bigger, and then, the welfare will definitely be greatly improved.

However, in May, as soon as the new benefits came out, my heart was instantly cold.

First of all, the semi-annual bonus, I remember, the initial semi-annual bonus is 20% of the total subscription, now it is 20% of the remuneration, the remuneration is half of the total subscription, the website and the individual get 5 respectively, that is to say, 20% of the remuneration, is 20% of the total subscription, I really want to laugh, followed by full attendance, 4,000 words update, take 600 full attendance, whether you read the article admit it or not, your benefits are reduced.

Second, the issue of long-term covenants

As for the long-term contract, my attitude is not resistant, and I will sign it, and I don't plan to go to other websites anyway.

Well, now the question arises.

The first question, before signing a long-term contract, you read the article to promise the author, the recommendation of resources tilt, why, I signed a long-term contract after the new book is released, the first recommendation is classified new book recommendation, the second recommendation is classified news, the third recommendation of new book selection, the first three recommendations, all are pants push, the fourth recommendation is strong, and then, the fifth recommendation, classification of new book recommendation, may I ask China Literature Group, this is the so-called recommendation resource tilt? I didn't sign a long-term contract, and the starting point never gave me a pants push, and I signed a long-term contract, but instead changed to this treatment, in the end, what is the tilt of this recommended resource? Don't say that my grades are not good, my works are now more than 2,000 orders, and there is absolutely no problem in winning the high-quality products.

The second question is, China Literature Group has recently promised to cancel the channel fee, and now, I think everyone knows, has this so-called channel fee been abolished, and why, there are a large number of authors at the starting point, and the income due to sales is seriously inconsistent with the actual income? Why, starting point background, so far I can't see the income of third-party platforms and the income of its own platforms within the group? Why does China Literature dare not be open and transparent with the authors of the starting point? Even if there is a channel fee, how should it be calculated? How should the website and the author be divided, and why not specify it in the contract?

Thirdly, why does China Literature Group not cancel the subscription of the coin, and why does it deprive the author of the rights and interests that he actually deserves to promote the game for advertising, even if it is an advertisement, it should give the author a little share?

The fourth question, the problem of remuneration, the starting point chapter is 3,000 words, each chapter subscribes to six starting coins, three starting coins for remuneration, the website and the author are equally divided into three points of remuneration, 1.5 starting coins on both sides, it used to be sent once every six months, and now it is issued on a monthly basis, now I want to ask about reading the article, why, after the author's manuscript fee income is calculated, the remuneration of 1.5 can not be seen?

Fifth, on the issue of copyright, why are we, as creators, not qualified to go to game companies to negotiate copyrights, and why even if a game company comes to us, whether we sell copyrights or not must be approved by your website? Why can a website sell the copyright of the author's work privately without the author's consent? If the author wants to publish, Simplified and Traditional, why should he also get the permission of the website?

That's what I've been asking for a year.

China Literature, you are the only website in the online literature industry that cuts benefits, and you are also the only website that dares to sign a long-term contract.

Of course, I can understand both of these points, open source and reduce expenditure, you can earn a little more eleven points, and sign a long-term contract, because the author is a resource, and he must hold the resource in his hands.

However, have you ever had the slightest respect for us online writers?

I still remember that back then, Long Kong broke the news that Hou Xiaoqiang looked down on the online article.

Yes, I know that Hou Xiaoqiang does look down on online articles, but he has never despised the online authors, and now, Wu Wenhui, he did not despise the online articles, but he treats the online writers as dogs, and rewards you with a mouthful of food, you should obediently wag your tail to Lao Tzu.

So far, in my eyes, what China Literature wants to do is to engage in copyright, sell copyright, and try its best to win over high-level authors, and selling one copyright is equivalent to the benefits brought by more than a dozen middle-level authors.

What a pity! High-level authors, Wubai, are not something you can hold on to Reading Literature, and it is not so easy to want their copyright, and middle-level authors, you are desperately squeezing, hitting their creative enthusiasm, compressing their upside, for fear that there will be another uncontrolled author, low-level author, directly cut the full attendance, and maximize the benefits.

China Literature, I just want to laugh.

Jack Ma seems to have said that there are two reasons why employees want to resign, either they are aggrieved, or they make less money.

I'm now, both.

。