Chapter 16 Electricity in Triboelectric Activation

Mizukawa Mizukawa rubbed it with an unknown object, and it was able to absorb small confetti. He looked at the three of them and asked, "What do you mean by the electricity in triboelectric electricity?"

Liuzi Fenglai said without hesitation: This problem can be seen in connection with others. When we say there is no electricity in our daily life, we mean electric current. Therefore, the electricity in triboelectric is the electric current. Although an object is rubbed against it, it does not directly produce an electric current. If needed, use others. However, friction is the cause of the generation of electric current. Naturally, it can be said that triboelectric is generated. Note that this refers to can, not have.

Some people say that friction causes magnetism, and then electricity is generated. We know that every object has magnets inside, but most objects have magnets in different directions. After friction, the direction of the magnetic element is continuously forced to unify to one direction, so that the object becomes magnetic. As the friction continues to intensify, the magnetism also begins to increase. At this point, a magnetic field is generated. According to electromagnetic induction, an electric current is generated.

I don't think that's right. Although electromagnetic induction exists, it does not mean that the magnetic field necessarily produces an electric field. There is no evidence that friction can magnetize an object. Not to mention generating electric current. There is a huge logical loophole in this shadow.

Margarita rubbed her hand and said, "I think what we used to think of as positive and negative charges are actually two different electrons, different from the electrons inside the object. I think it's the negative number that enters the object, causing the electrons to diverge. What is a negative quantity? That is, the value of one of its variables is negative. If two objects encounter it, it is positiveized and negatively numbered, respectively. It may sound strange, but I'm pretty sure it's true.

Mathematics and physics are closely related, not isolated from each other. In the past, people thought that negative numbers were meaningless and did not exist in the universe. However, when scientists discovered that negative charges, or new positrons, made sense, they realized that negative numbers make sense in the real world. I think one day scientists will discover that irrational numbers exist directly in objects, not as a proportion.

Duenas opened his mouth wide: triboelectric is actually the creation of new electrons, Margarita, your opinion really shocked me. The existence of negative quantities still needs to be verified, but it is unlikely that they will be found.

In my opinion, the electricity in triboelectric refers to the electric charge. Objects have electrons but no electric charge. Liuzifeng is an electric current, and I don't think that's right. Although the two objects have an electric charge, the positive and negative charges do not follow a fixed direction. However, it provides the possibility of generating electric current.

Seeing that Dueñas did not speak again, Mizukawa quickly began to speak: I think the electricity in triboelectric refers to electrical energy. Surely you don't think this is talking about electricity in disguise? Not really. Although the charge does not move and form an electric current, the charge is energetic. And I think that the energy carried by the charge is electrical energy, which is also newly generated.

Some people say, don't I admit that the charge is the electricity in triboelectric power? This is not the case. I think that electric charges are inherently present in objects. In other words, the charge is not a particle at all but just a state. The charge is inherent in the object, but most of the time it is hidden. When an object is subjected to external action, its charge is slowly revealed.