Mizukawa pointed to the laces and said, "What do you have to say about it?" In accordance with the principle of the first priority of names, Dueñas was the first to say: We have discussed shapes and know that shapes can form the forces of shape.

You see the laces are going around and they're all closed. The closed state is a shape, and its force is also the closed force.

First of all, closure can be divided into two types. One is open and closed, that is, only the closed circle and the upper ring.

In this case, the closure is easy to lift. Correspondingly, the closing force will also be very low.

If an out-of-loop wire is too short, the closure is extremely easy to unclose. The second is the closing closure, which is the upper connecting ring.

Generally speaking, people make two upper loops instead of one when tying their shoes. Why?

Because the outer circle line is very long. If an out-of-loop wire does not create an upper loop, then it will hang around the shoe.

In this way, there is a threat to human security. However, it is theoretically possible to have an upper lap.

According to the principle of ladies first, Margarita said: Didn't you notice? The two segments of the lace are actually entangled.

For such objects, I call them entangled bodies. When it comes to entanglements, we have to mention magnets. Have you ever thought about magnet entanglements?

Actually, it's very simple. It is to use the magnetic principle of repulsion of the same order and attraction of opposite poles to combine magnets.

First, let's look at the first one. The intersection of the S and N classes of two bar magnets can be equivalent to a new bar magnet.

This is the most familiar to everyone. The second is to build on the first one, plus two bar magnets.

Of course, the two magnets are still connected differently. When bringing two large magnets close, adjust the orientation of one large magnet.

Let the two large magnets adjacent to each other connect the small magnets heterogeneously, excluding the diagonally adjacent ones. Finally, the four small magnets will separate.

But they're all together. There can be many similar magnet entanglements. A magnet triangle is formed by placing three bar magnets on the same level.

Of course, such an object requires a huge force from the outside world to be truly formed. Liuzifeng said: Speaking of entanglement bodies, how can you not talk about nets?

It can be said that the net perfectly interprets the mathematical principle of what is called the movement of lines into surfaces. Of course, the net is not a complete plane, but the net has the characteristics of a plane.

I call the net a semi-planar. The emergence of the net profoundly reflects the combination of the virtual and the real, the blurred and the clear division.

The shape force of the net is the entangled force, and its magnitude is determined by the grid points in the net. The more grid points, the greater the entanglement.

Of course, the entangled force is also related to the physical properties of the material of the net. Of course, they are entangled in different ways.

Entanglement can be static or dynamic depending on the state. The entanglement between the network cables is static, while the entanglement between magnets is dynamic.

In my opinion, the static entanglement force is less than the dynamic entanglement force. Since we have said this, we cannot fail to talk about quantum entanglement.

So, is the entanglement between quanta static or dynamic? According to scientists, the speed and position of the quantum are not fixed.

From this, it can be seen that their entanglement should be dynamic. So, are they the same entanglement as magnets?

It's not clear. Perhaps. Mizukawa said: It seems that everyone is prepared, and next time I will have a difficult topic.