Speaking of this variable difference, it is inseparable from the temperature difference and the density difference. Of course, the main reason for its emergence is mathematics.

Although I haven't measured it, I think variable differences are universal. Since there is a variable difference, there must be a corresponding property.

And this kind of property is what I call the poor nature. In addition to knowing that temperature differences can lead to heat transfer, density differences can cause stratification in liquid environments.

There must be a sum when there is a difference, and the sum and the nature of the sum of variables may occur. However, the curve folds the same, and the properties are still not yet discovered.

I think that objects satisfy a kind of harmony and difference symmetry, and that the harmony property is very likely. For temperature and density, I think and properties are bound to be there.

So, why haven't physicists made discoveries and properties? I don't think physicists the experimental school found the phenomenon of overshadowing, and the theorists don't seem to care about variables and sums.

Variable differences are easy to understand. After all, it's hard to have the same variable for two objects. It's natural, and physicists naturally notice.

And the sum of variables is extremely mathematical. Originally, the values of the same variable of the two objects are not related, and physicists naturally do not think of asking for sum.

The variable difference is something that every two objects have, and the same is true for the sum of variables. However, microscopic particles have no variable difference and variable sum.

Because two particles of the same kind are identical particles, they are clones of each other. Just as there are variables that are poor but not necessarily bad, in the same way, there are variables and there are not necessarily sums.

In general, it is much easier to form a poor property than to form a combination of properties. However, as long as one variable of one or two objects has a differential property, I think and properties must exist.

However, the sum nature is not the opposite nature of the bad nature. Okay, that's all for now. Next, let's discuss the variable difference!

Mizukawa said. Have you ever thought about the common points of boiling point, melting point, etc.? I thought about it. I abstract variable nodes based on them, and the reason why the difference and sum properties of some object pairs are not ambiguous is that they are in the same node region.

If you want the sum and difference properties of object pairs to be particularly ambiguous, you must have their same variables at different variable nodes.

It is the node area length that determines the object reaching a new variable node. Suppose there is a variable node 0, then when the variable value is greater than 0, at the beginning, the node area is very long and the variable nodes are very dense.

As the distance from 0 increases, the node area becomes longer and the node becomes looser.

At this point, the increment of node area length will continue to increase. The closer the variable value is to the limit value infinity, the more the extreme effect becomes more implicit.

Since variable differences have differential properties, variable nodes have node properties. For example, in the case of yin, the melting point of the temperature node causes ice to turn into water.

The boiling point turns the water into water vapor. Xiao Ni said. Since variable difference is optional, what about eliminating it?

I think there are five scenarios. The first is that in the two objects A and B, object A becomes object B. The second is the other way around.

Thirdly, they become object C. Fourth, nothing changes. Fifth, they will disappear.

Although this question may seem boring, it is still worth research and analysis when you think about it.

Margarita said. Duenas said: I have nothing to say. Originally, Mizukawa Yonetoshi was here to make the closing remarks, but I thought I should do it.

Recently, our discussion has changed. Previously, we were just subjectively guessing. Of course, we still do, but we have more time to argue for ourselves.

It took a long time, and the terminology used became more abstract. New changes are inevitable, and we all have to adapt to them.

Well, that's it.