I know you're still very interested in yesterday's topic. After all, shadows are so funny. However, there is a scope for everything. What we are talking about today is light and shadow and mirror shadow, two very representative shadows. Through observation, I found that light and shadow are changing. And the mirror shadow is unchanging. If you don't believe me, you can try it. As for why this is the case, I think the reason is that every part of the object absorbs the photons from the mirror, and there is no place where this is not the case. And the photons coming from the light source are not present in all parts of the object. Photons, on the other hand, are fluctuating and jump into parts that do not absorb photons. Then, this process is captured as a shadow in motion. This is because photons do not immediately merge into an object after entering the object. Rather, it is free in all directions of the object, which is the reason for the formation of shadows. In fact, the shadow we see is a map of the distribution of free photons inside the object. That's all for me, and it's your turn to speak. Mizukawa's opening remarks are really good.

When it comes to mirrors and light and shadow, we have to talk about self-luminous luminions and light sources. Mirrors are not light sources and do not produce shadows. Without sunlight and lights, mirrors cannot have shadows. However, mirrors can also emit photons spontaneously. Why? Because there are free photons on the surface of the mirror, the photons of the light source allow the free photons to enter the object. So, there is a shadow.

Dueñas, didn't you say that mirrors emit photons spontaneously, so why should they use the photons of light sources? I think it's because the mirror is reflective, that is, the photon can't exist on the mirror at all. As a result, all the photons were sent into the human body. Therefore, it is the constant situation that Mizukawa said is unchanged.

Liuzi Feng is coming, you are wrong. It's not that mirrors can't absorb photons, but they absorb less. You think the shadow in the mirror is holocastic, but when you look at it with a microscope, you will see the dark spots. How to understand it? The higher the camera pixels, the sharper the resolution of the photo. However, the resolution of a photo cannot be 1. The same goes for mirrors. Just because the mirror has a high shadow resolution, we mistakenly think that the mirror shadow is the holographic of the object.

Alicia, just when you are right. How do you explain that the shadow in the mirror has color?

Because photons have colors. Alicia

So, why are some lights and shadows black? Or that most of the shadows are black, so are the colors of the photons black? The six sons of the wind come.

Because the color of the photon is dualistic, it can be both visible and unrepresented. Alicia.

On what basis do you say that the color of photons is binary, that you have experimented? Six.

No! It's just my guess. Didn't we say earlier that there are free photons, but there are also fixed photons. The color of fixed and free photons is different. I think that free photons have basically no color, while fixed photons do. The color of the shadow in the mirror is emitted by the fixed photons inside the object. Mugwort.

So how do you explain that light and shadow can be white? Six.

This says that the color of the yin fixed photon is different. Mugwort.

I think it's because the color of the shadow itself is close to white. Since it is a reflection, it is essentially a reflection of the shadow of an object. Therefore, it is not surprising that it is the same color as the surface of the object. Six..

There is some truth to that. Alicia graciously admits that her views were wrong.

……。