Whether light is a wave or a particle is a huge debate in physics, but I wondered if this was saying that photons are actually waves. It's very cloudy, and the particles here are not photons. And waves are naturally light waves. We all know that there are many photons, but what about light waves? Do you think light waves are one or many? Mizukawa's behavior is always confusing, and this time too.

Whether the light waves are one or many, we might as well look at the water waves. We know that water waves are actually very cloudy, and the cloudy is the characteristic of waves. If there are many light waves, how can they exhibit the characteristics of yin? Just like every object has magnetons, however the direction of the magnetons is different. Therefore, most objects are not magnetic. If there are many light waves, then the direction of the light waves is different. And in this way, the phenomenon of light cannot be manifested.

Don't you think that because many light waves are in the same direction, there is a physical phenomenon of light in objects? Why is light reflected and refracted in the past? I think it's because some of the light waves don't go in the same direction as most of the light waves.

When there is only one light wave, reflection and refraction can also be explained. And why do you say that there are many light waves?

Duenias, may I ask if there is only one light wave and all the photons are in the light wave. So, how big should this light wave be? And the photons are constantly coming out of the luminous body, and the light waves are constantly formed. Also, the photon is not stationary, it is in motion. In this way, will the light waves be stretched again? I'm about to ask, how can light waves be formed and stretched at the same time? It's very shadowy, and it's counterintuitive. The simplest explanation is that there are many light waves. In other words, one photon corresponds to one light wave. As long as there is a photon, there is a light wave.

The six sons of the wind come, photons are microscopic particles, which we cannot see with the naked eye. However, physicists discovered light waves experimentally. Note that this is found with the naked eye. If it is a photon that produces a light wave, or a photon is a light wave. So how do you explain that light waves can be observed with the naked eye?

Dueñas, you overlooked a detail. We look at the photon as the volume and the light wave as the surface area. It is true that the size of the photon is small, but this does not prevent its light wave from having a large surface area! For this problem, learning a little knowledge of geometry can be white.

Okay, Margarita. How do you explain that some photons are absorbed by objects after they break away from the beam?

In fact, the photons emitted by the luminous body are eventually absorbed by other objects. It's just a matter of time. You want to say that the beam of light is determined by the light waves, and some of the photons escape from the light waves. However, you notice that if there is only one light wave, then the light wave must be three-dimensional and closed. As far as I know, the light waves observed by physicists are not three-dimensional and closed. In other words, there can't be only one light wave.

Margarita, why do you say that light waves are three-dimensional?

Haven't you looked closely at the light? Not all photons are on a plane. Because the beam is divergent, your wave must be inclusive of all the beams. In this case, the light waves are naturally not planar.

Dueniston was silent and never spoke again. Now that the conclusion has been discussed, the discussion should be over. Soon, the four of them began to prepare for a cloudy discussion again.